Paper Tigers, Hidden Dragons: Firms and the Political Economy of China's Technological Development

Douglas B. Fuller
{"title":"Paper Tigers, Hidden Dragons: Firms and the Political Economy of China's Technological Development","authors":"Douglas B. Fuller","doi":"10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198777205.001.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China presents us with a conundrum. How has a developing country with a spectacularly inefficient financial system, coupled with asset-destroying state-owned firms, managed to create a number of vibrant high-tech firms? China's domestic financial system fails most private firms by neglecting to give them sufficient support to pursue technological upgrading, even while smothering state-favoured firms by providing them with too much support. Due to their foreign financing, multinational corporations suffer from neither insufficient funds nor soft budget constraints, but they are insufficiently committed to China's development. Hybrid firms that combine ethnic Chinese management and foreign financing are the hidden dragons driving China's technological development. They avoid the maladies of China's domestic financial system while remaining committed to enhancing China's domestic technological capabilities. In sad contrast, China's domestic firms are technological paper tigers. State efforts to build local innovation clusters and create national champions have not managed to transform these firms into drivers of technological development. These findings upend fundamental debates about China's political economy. Rather than a choice between state capitalism and building domestic market institutions, China has fostered state capitalism even while tolerating the importing of foreign market institutions. While the book's findings suggest that China's state and domestic market institutions are ineffective, the hybrids promise an alternative way to avoid the middle-income trap. By documenting how variation in China's institutional terrain impacts technological development, the book also provides much needed nuance to widespread yet mutually irreconcilable claims that China is either an emerging innovation power or a technological backwater. Looking beyond China, hybrid-led development has implications for new alternative economic development models and new ways to conceptualize contemporary capitalism that go beyond current domestic institution-centric approaches.","PeriodicalId":19574,"journal":{"name":"OUP Catalogue","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"85","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OUP Catalogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198777205.001.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 85

Abstract

China presents us with a conundrum. How has a developing country with a spectacularly inefficient financial system, coupled with asset-destroying state-owned firms, managed to create a number of vibrant high-tech firms? China's domestic financial system fails most private firms by neglecting to give them sufficient support to pursue technological upgrading, even while smothering state-favoured firms by providing them with too much support. Due to their foreign financing, multinational corporations suffer from neither insufficient funds nor soft budget constraints, but they are insufficiently committed to China's development. Hybrid firms that combine ethnic Chinese management and foreign financing are the hidden dragons driving China's technological development. They avoid the maladies of China's domestic financial system while remaining committed to enhancing China's domestic technological capabilities. In sad contrast, China's domestic firms are technological paper tigers. State efforts to build local innovation clusters and create national champions have not managed to transform these firms into drivers of technological development. These findings upend fundamental debates about China's political economy. Rather than a choice between state capitalism and building domestic market institutions, China has fostered state capitalism even while tolerating the importing of foreign market institutions. While the book's findings suggest that China's state and domestic market institutions are ineffective, the hybrids promise an alternative way to avoid the middle-income trap. By documenting how variation in China's institutional terrain impacts technological development, the book also provides much needed nuance to widespread yet mutually irreconcilable claims that China is either an emerging innovation power or a technological backwater. Looking beyond China, hybrid-led development has implications for new alternative economic development models and new ways to conceptualize contemporary capitalism that go beyond current domestic institution-centric approaches.
纸老虎、隐藏的龙:企业与中国技术发展的政治经济
中国给我们提出了一个难题。一个金融体系极其低效的发展中国家,加上破坏资产的国有企业,是如何创造出一批充满活力的高科技企业的?中国国内的金融体系忽视了为大多数私营企业提供足够的支持以追求技术升级,从而使它们失败,甚至因为提供过多的支持而扼杀了政府青睐的企业。跨国公司通过对外融资,既没有资金不足的问题,也没有预算软约束的问题,但对中国发展的投入不够。将华人管理与外资融资相结合的混合型企业是推动中国科技发展的“隐形龙”。他们避免了中国国内金融体系的弊病,同时继续致力于提高中国国内的技术能力。与之形成鲜明对比的是,中国国内企业在技术上是纸老虎。国家建立地方创新集群和打造国家冠军企业的努力,并没有成功地将这些企业转变为技术发展的驱动力。这些发现颠覆了关于中国政治经济的基本争论。中国没有在国家资本主义和建立国内市场制度之间做出选择,而是在培育国家资本主义的同时,容忍外国市场制度的引入。尽管该书的研究结果表明,中国的国家和国内市场机构是无效的,但这种混合机制有望成为避免中等收入陷阱的另一种方式。通过记录中国制度地形的变化如何影响技术发展,这本书还提供了非常需要的细微差别,以解决普遍存在但相互矛盾的说法,即中国要么是新兴的创新大国,要么是技术落后的国家。放眼中国以外,混合主导的发展对新的替代性经济发展模式和概念化当代资本主义的新方法具有启示意义,这些模式超越了目前国内以制度为中心的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信