Comparison of ureterorenoscopy (URS) procedure performed under general and spinal anesthesia in ureteral stones

S. Celikkaya, B. Ozturk, H. Ozkardes
{"title":"Comparison of ureterorenoscopy (URS) procedure performed under general and spinal anesthesia in ureteral stones","authors":"S. Celikkaya, B. Ozturk, H. Ozkardes","doi":"10.4328/acam.21443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate records of the patients who underwent ureterorenoscopy under general and spinal anesthesia and to determine whether the type of anesthesia affected the success of the operation and complications. Material and Methods: Medical records of 1548 patients who underwent ureterorenoscopy [URS] were retrospectively reviewed for 10 years. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of anesthesia as general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia groups. Routine monitoring was performed in the operating. Two groups were compared in terms of demographic data, preoperative, operative and postoperative characteristics. Results: The mean age was statistically significantly higher in the general anesthesia group [49.57±15,31] compared to the spinal anesthesia group [47.21±13.19]","PeriodicalId":22236,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of Clinical and Analytical Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of Clinical and Analytical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4328/acam.21443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate records of the patients who underwent ureterorenoscopy under general and spinal anesthesia and to determine whether the type of anesthesia affected the success of the operation and complications. Material and Methods: Medical records of 1548 patients who underwent ureterorenoscopy [URS] were retrospectively reviewed for 10 years. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of anesthesia as general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia groups. Routine monitoring was performed in the operating. Two groups were compared in terms of demographic data, preoperative, operative and postoperative characteristics. Results: The mean age was statistically significantly higher in the general anesthesia group [49.57±15,31] compared to the spinal anesthesia group [47.21±13.19]
输尿管镜(URS)手术在全身麻醉和脊髓麻醉下治疗输尿管结石的比较
目的:本研究的目的是评估在全身麻醉和脊髓麻醉下行输尿管镜检查的患者的记录,并确定麻醉类型是否影响手术成功和并发症。材料与方法:回顾性分析1548例输尿管镜检查(URS)患者10年来的医疗记录。根据麻醉方式将患者分为全身麻醉组和脊髓麻醉组。术中进行常规监测。比较两组患者的人口学资料、术前、手术及术后特征。结果:全麻组患者的平均年龄[49.57±15.31]明显高于脊髓麻醉组[47.21±13.19]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信