ASSESSMENT OF THE SET OF PARAMETERS FOR AN INTEGRAL EVALUATION OF AN ECOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL STATE OF SOILS IN ORGANIC AGRICULTURE

V. Kulagina, L. M. Sungatullina, S. S. Ryazanov, M. KhayrullinaA., R. R. Shagidullin, E. H. Rupova
{"title":"ASSESSMENT OF THE SET OF PARAMETERS FOR AN INTEGRAL EVALUATION OF AN ECOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL STATE OF SOILS IN ORGANIC AGRICULTURE","authors":"V. Kulagina, L. M. Sungatullina, S. S. Ryazanov, M. KhayrullinaA., R. R. Shagidullin, E. H. Rupova","doi":"10.37279/2413-1725-2021-7-1-90-102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organic farming is designed to maintain soil fertility and to assist biodiversity restoration. Developing of methods for assessment of ecological and biological state of soil under organic agriculture is becoming an increasingly urgent task. The purpose of the current work is to evaluate the capabilities of an integrated indicator to identify significant differences in ecological and biological soil states under organic and traditional farming management. The proposed integral indices were calculated on the basis of the number of trophic groups of microorganisms, ecological and trophic indices, and nitrogen and humus soil content. The studies were performed on gray forest soils of the two farms located in the Mamadyshsky and Vysokogorsky districts of the Republic of Tatarstan. The soils of fields with traditional farming and fields where the organic farming system has been used for 3–5 years were compared. In the samples taken in 2019, the following parameters were determined: the content of humus and total nitrogen, the number of 6 trophic groups of microorganisms, the coefficient of mineralization, and the index of pedotrophy. The studied parameters were ranked in the following order of informativeness for separating soils of organic and traditional fields: the number of amylolytics and actinomycetes > the number of ammonifiers > the number of cellulose-decomposing microorganisms, pedotrophs, micromycetes > the content of humus, total nitrogen> the index of pedotrophy, the coefficient of mineralization / immobilization. The variability in the number of trophic groups of microorganisms is generally medium and high. The values of the studied parameters, in addition to the number of pedotrophic and cellulose-destroying microorganisms, increased in the following order: soils of traditional fields < soils of organic fields < virgin soils. The number of pedotrophs and cellulose-destroying microorganisms, on the contrary, decreased from traditional fields to virgin areas, therefore, to calculate the integral indicator of the biological state of soils (IPBS), it was decided to use not just the point obtained from the number of these groups of microorganisms, but the inverted value «100 – point». The calculation of the integral indicator of the biological state of soils was carried out first using all 10 studied parameters, and then 8, 6, and 3 of the most informative ones. The least informative ones were excluded from the calculation. It was shown that the IGBP reflected the level of anthropogenic loads in all cases. When all 10 parameters were used, the integral indicator changed naturally in the following order: virgin background area – organic fields – traditional fields. The maximum value of the integral indicator of the biological state was observed in the virgin area, which is distinguished by the best biological state of soils, in organic fields the values of the integral indicator are lower, and in traditional fields – the lowest. With a sequential decrease in the number of parameters, this pattern does not change. The highest values of the integral indicator are always observed in the virgin area – 100 %. The lowest are found in the soils of fields with traditional farming. The processing of the results showed that the differences between the soils of organic and traditional fields according to the IPBS were statistically significant in the Mamadyshsky district using 8 parameters, in Vysokogorsky – 3 parameters for calculating the IPBS. Thus, in order to identify changes in the biological state of soils during the transition from traditional to organic farming after 3–5 years of practice, 3–8 of the most informative microbiological and agrochemical parameters are sufficient. Nevertheless, the search for less labor-consuming and less variable parameters for calculating the IPBS should be continued.","PeriodicalId":21653,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Biology. Chemistry","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Biology. Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37279/2413-1725-2021-7-1-90-102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Organic farming is designed to maintain soil fertility and to assist biodiversity restoration. Developing of methods for assessment of ecological and biological state of soil under organic agriculture is becoming an increasingly urgent task. The purpose of the current work is to evaluate the capabilities of an integrated indicator to identify significant differences in ecological and biological soil states under organic and traditional farming management. The proposed integral indices were calculated on the basis of the number of trophic groups of microorganisms, ecological and trophic indices, and nitrogen and humus soil content. The studies were performed on gray forest soils of the two farms located in the Mamadyshsky and Vysokogorsky districts of the Republic of Tatarstan. The soils of fields with traditional farming and fields where the organic farming system has been used for 3–5 years were compared. In the samples taken in 2019, the following parameters were determined: the content of humus and total nitrogen, the number of 6 trophic groups of microorganisms, the coefficient of mineralization, and the index of pedotrophy. The studied parameters were ranked in the following order of informativeness for separating soils of organic and traditional fields: the number of amylolytics and actinomycetes > the number of ammonifiers > the number of cellulose-decomposing microorganisms, pedotrophs, micromycetes > the content of humus, total nitrogen> the index of pedotrophy, the coefficient of mineralization / immobilization. The variability in the number of trophic groups of microorganisms is generally medium and high. The values of the studied parameters, in addition to the number of pedotrophic and cellulose-destroying microorganisms, increased in the following order: soils of traditional fields < soils of organic fields < virgin soils. The number of pedotrophs and cellulose-destroying microorganisms, on the contrary, decreased from traditional fields to virgin areas, therefore, to calculate the integral indicator of the biological state of soils (IPBS), it was decided to use not just the point obtained from the number of these groups of microorganisms, but the inverted value «100 – point». The calculation of the integral indicator of the biological state of soils was carried out first using all 10 studied parameters, and then 8, 6, and 3 of the most informative ones. The least informative ones were excluded from the calculation. It was shown that the IGBP reflected the level of anthropogenic loads in all cases. When all 10 parameters were used, the integral indicator changed naturally in the following order: virgin background area – organic fields – traditional fields. The maximum value of the integral indicator of the biological state was observed in the virgin area, which is distinguished by the best biological state of soils, in organic fields the values of the integral indicator are lower, and in traditional fields – the lowest. With a sequential decrease in the number of parameters, this pattern does not change. The highest values of the integral indicator are always observed in the virgin area – 100 %. The lowest are found in the soils of fields with traditional farming. The processing of the results showed that the differences between the soils of organic and traditional fields according to the IPBS were statistically significant in the Mamadyshsky district using 8 parameters, in Vysokogorsky – 3 parameters for calculating the IPBS. Thus, in order to identify changes in the biological state of soils during the transition from traditional to organic farming after 3–5 years of practice, 3–8 of the most informative microbiological and agrochemical parameters are sufficient. Nevertheless, the search for less labor-consuming and less variable parameters for calculating the IPBS should be continued.
有机农业中土壤生态和生物状态的综合评价参数集的评估
有机农业旨在保持土壤肥力并协助生物多样性恢复。开发有机农业土壤生态与生物状态评价方法已成为一项日益紧迫的任务。当前工作的目的是评估一个综合指标的能力,以识别有机和传统农业管理下生态和生物土壤状态的显著差异。综合考虑微生物营养类群数量、生态营养指标、土壤含氮量和腐殖质含量,计算出综合指标。这些研究是在位于鞑靼斯坦共和国马马代什基和维索科戈尔斯基区的两个农场的灰色森林土壤上进行的。比较了传统农作田和有机农作田3 ~ 5年的土壤。在2019年采集的样品中,测定了腐殖质和总氮含量、6种营养类群微生物数量、矿化系数和养土指数。各参数对有机田与传统田土壤分离的信息量排序为:解淀粉菌和放线菌数量>氨化菌数量>纤维素分解微生物、养土菌、微菌数量>腐殖质含量、总氮含量>养土指数、矿化/固定化系数。微生物营养类群数量的可变性一般为中等和高度。除土壤营养微生物和纤维素破坏微生物数量外,各参数值的增加顺序为:传统农田土壤<有机农田土壤<处女地土壤。相反,从传统农田到未开垦地区,养土微生物和破坏纤维素的微生物的数量减少了,因此,为了计算土壤生物状态的积分指标(IPBS),决定不仅使用从这些微生物群的数量中获得的点,而且使用反向值“100 -点”。首先利用所有10个研究参数计算土壤生物状态积分指标,然后利用信息量最大的8、6、3个参数计算土壤生物状态积分指标。信息量最小的被排除在计算之外。结果表明,IGBP反映了所有病例的人为负荷水平。当所有10个参数都被使用时,积分指标的自然变化顺序为:原始背景区-有机田-传统田。在以土壤生物状态最好为特征的处女地,土壤生物状态综合指标值最大;在有机田中,土壤生物状态综合指标值较低,在传统田中最低。随着参数数量的连续减少,这种模式不会改变。积分指标的最大值总是在未开发区域观察到- 100%。最低的是在传统农业的土壤中。结果表明,在Mamadyshsky地区,使用8个参数计算有机农田土壤与传统农田土壤的IPBS差异具有统计学意义,在Vysokogorsky地区,使用3个参数计算IPBS差异具有统计学意义。因此,为了确定3-5年后从传统农业向有机农业过渡期间土壤生物状态的变化,3-8个最具信息量的微生物和农化参数就足够了。尽管如此,仍应继续寻找较少耗费人力和较少变动的参数来计算IPBS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信