Oncology nurses' perception of cancer pain: A qualitative exploratory study

Alicia García, D. Whitehead, H. Winter
{"title":"Oncology nurses' perception of cancer pain: A qualitative exploratory study","authors":"Alicia García, D. Whitehead, H. Winter","doi":"10.36951/ngpxnz.2015.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionPain is one of the most distressing symptoms experienced by patients with cancer undergoing active treatment (Stark, Tofthagen, Visovsky, & McMillan, 2012). Despite advances in understanding the aetiology of cancer pain, pharmacological developments, pain assessment tools and management guidelines, pain often remains poorly managed. Many patients with cancer continue to experience severe and unrelieved pain resulting in unnecessary suffering (Dulko, Hertz, Julien, Beck, & Money, 2010; Fairchild, 2010; Huntoon, 2009). Acute pain can be triggered by surgery and diagnostic procedures such as bone marrow aspirations and repeated intravenous cannulations for chemotherapy drugs (Chapman, 2011). Treatment effects such as chemotherapy-induced neuropathy may also contribute to reported pain (De Grandis, 2007; Lavoie Smith, Cohen, Pett, & Beck, 2010).Barriers to effective pain management are commonly reported throughout health care systems and may relate to the system, health professionals, and patients themselves (Bennett, Flemming, & Closs, 2011). With regard to nursing oncology practice, a lack of knowledge surrounding opioid delivery and its effects contribute to pain prevalence (Voshall, Dunn, & Shelestak, 2013). Yildirim, Cicek, and Uyar (2008) found that oncology nurses possessed inaccurate knowledge about commonly used analgesics and consequently exaggerated anxiety about the potential for psychological dependence occurring. Furthermore, patients themselves are often reluctant to report pain related to concerns about the impact of subsequent treatment decisions, personal cost, and their own fears of addiction and dependence (Simone, Vapiwala, Hampshire, & Metz, 2012).Oncology nurses are noted as being at the frontline of cancer pain management (Aycock & Boyle, 2009). Nurses perform and evaluate many interventions for pain management and have an essential role in deciding when changes in plans are required (Bernardi, Catania, Lambert, Tridello, & Luzzani, 2007; Chapman, 2011). This study explored how oncology nurses perceive, experience and assess cancer pain in their patients and, subsequently highlighted factors affecting the delivery of effective pain management strategies.MethodsA qualitative descriptive exploratory study was conducted using semi-structured interviews in order to achieve a detailed exploration of oncology nurses' perceptions of cancer pain in patients were receiving chemotherapy. A purposive sampling method was used to include experienced participants who had knowledge of the phenomenon in question (Berg, 2009; Sandelowski, 2010). The participants were five second-level chemotherapy-certified oncology nurses. The age of participants ranged from 32 to 55 years, with an average time of ten years working in the oncology field. All the available participants were female.Data were collected using one-to-one semi-structured interviews. Interviews are commonly used to gather in-depth exploration of nurse's perceptions, views, feelings, and experiences (Garton & Copland, 2010). Questions were open-ended to allow flexibility and encourage a richer narrative. Examples of the included questions were: What does pain mean to you?, How do you perceive cancer pain?, Does the pain reported by your patients have any impact on your practice?, How do you feel when your patient is in pain?, How well prepared do you feel to effectively manage a patients pain?. Further prompts, where needed, were used in order to clarify and to extend related concepts of cancer pain management.The interviews were audio-taped to ensure data accuracy. Once transcribed, inductive thematic analysis was conducted to identify codes, categories and themes relevant to the research question (Fereday & Muir-Cochrane, 2006). A Framework Analysis approach was applied (Richie & Spencer, 1994). Immersion in the raw data was achieved by listening to the interview tapes and then repeated reading of the transcripts to ensure familiarity with the data. …","PeriodicalId":77298,"journal":{"name":"Nursing praxis in New Zealand inc","volume":"39 1","pages":"27-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing praxis in New Zealand inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36951/ngpxnz.2015.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

IntroductionPain is one of the most distressing symptoms experienced by patients with cancer undergoing active treatment (Stark, Tofthagen, Visovsky, & McMillan, 2012). Despite advances in understanding the aetiology of cancer pain, pharmacological developments, pain assessment tools and management guidelines, pain often remains poorly managed. Many patients with cancer continue to experience severe and unrelieved pain resulting in unnecessary suffering (Dulko, Hertz, Julien, Beck, & Money, 2010; Fairchild, 2010; Huntoon, 2009). Acute pain can be triggered by surgery and diagnostic procedures such as bone marrow aspirations and repeated intravenous cannulations for chemotherapy drugs (Chapman, 2011). Treatment effects such as chemotherapy-induced neuropathy may also contribute to reported pain (De Grandis, 2007; Lavoie Smith, Cohen, Pett, & Beck, 2010).Barriers to effective pain management are commonly reported throughout health care systems and may relate to the system, health professionals, and patients themselves (Bennett, Flemming, & Closs, 2011). With regard to nursing oncology practice, a lack of knowledge surrounding opioid delivery and its effects contribute to pain prevalence (Voshall, Dunn, & Shelestak, 2013). Yildirim, Cicek, and Uyar (2008) found that oncology nurses possessed inaccurate knowledge about commonly used analgesics and consequently exaggerated anxiety about the potential for psychological dependence occurring. Furthermore, patients themselves are often reluctant to report pain related to concerns about the impact of subsequent treatment decisions, personal cost, and their own fears of addiction and dependence (Simone, Vapiwala, Hampshire, & Metz, 2012).Oncology nurses are noted as being at the frontline of cancer pain management (Aycock & Boyle, 2009). Nurses perform and evaluate many interventions for pain management and have an essential role in deciding when changes in plans are required (Bernardi, Catania, Lambert, Tridello, & Luzzani, 2007; Chapman, 2011). This study explored how oncology nurses perceive, experience and assess cancer pain in their patients and, subsequently highlighted factors affecting the delivery of effective pain management strategies.MethodsA qualitative descriptive exploratory study was conducted using semi-structured interviews in order to achieve a detailed exploration of oncology nurses' perceptions of cancer pain in patients were receiving chemotherapy. A purposive sampling method was used to include experienced participants who had knowledge of the phenomenon in question (Berg, 2009; Sandelowski, 2010). The participants were five second-level chemotherapy-certified oncology nurses. The age of participants ranged from 32 to 55 years, with an average time of ten years working in the oncology field. All the available participants were female.Data were collected using one-to-one semi-structured interviews. Interviews are commonly used to gather in-depth exploration of nurse's perceptions, views, feelings, and experiences (Garton & Copland, 2010). Questions were open-ended to allow flexibility and encourage a richer narrative. Examples of the included questions were: What does pain mean to you?, How do you perceive cancer pain?, Does the pain reported by your patients have any impact on your practice?, How do you feel when your patient is in pain?, How well prepared do you feel to effectively manage a patients pain?. Further prompts, where needed, were used in order to clarify and to extend related concepts of cancer pain management.The interviews were audio-taped to ensure data accuracy. Once transcribed, inductive thematic analysis was conducted to identify codes, categories and themes relevant to the research question (Fereday & Muir-Cochrane, 2006). A Framework Analysis approach was applied (Richie & Spencer, 1994). Immersion in the raw data was achieved by listening to the interview tapes and then repeated reading of the transcripts to ensure familiarity with the data. …
肿瘤科护士对癌痛的认知:一项质性探索性研究
疼痛是接受积极治疗的癌症患者最痛苦的症状之一(Stark, Tofthagen, Visovsky, & McMillan, 2012)。尽管在了解癌症疼痛的病因、药理学发展、疼痛评估工具和管理指南方面取得了进展,但疼痛往往仍然管理不善。许多癌症患者持续经历严重且无法缓解的疼痛,导致不必要的痛苦(Dulko, Hertz, Julien, Beck, & Money, 2010;仙童,2010;霍顿,2009)。急性疼痛可由手术和诊断程序引发,如骨髓穿刺和化疗药物的反复静脉插管(Chapman, 2011)。化疗引起的神经病变等治疗效果也可能导致报告的疼痛(De Grandis, 2007;Lavoie Smith, Cohen, Pett, & Beck, 2010)。有效疼痛管理的障碍在整个医疗保健系统中普遍存在,可能与系统、卫生专业人员和患者本身有关(Bennett, Flemming, & Closs, 2011)。在护理肿瘤学实践中,缺乏对阿片类药物输送及其影响的了解导致了疼痛的流行(Voshall, Dunn, & Shelestak, 2013)。Yildirim, Cicek和Uyar(2008)发现肿瘤科护士对常用镇痛药的认识不准确,因此夸大了对心理依赖发生的可能性的焦虑。此外,由于担心后续治疗决策的影响、个人成本以及他们自己对成瘾和依赖的恐惧,患者自己往往不愿意报告疼痛(Simone, Vapiwala, Hampshire, & Metz, 2012)。肿瘤科护士被认为处于癌症疼痛管理的第一线(Aycock & Boyle, 2009)。护士执行和评估疼痛管理的许多干预措施,并在决定何时需要改变计划方面发挥重要作用(Bernardi, Catania, Lambert, Tridello, & Luzzani, 2007;查普曼,2011)。本研究探讨了肿瘤护士如何感知、体验和评估患者的癌症疼痛,并随后强调了影响有效疼痛管理策略交付的因素。方法采用半结构化访谈法进行定性描述性探索性研究,详细探讨肿瘤护士对化疗患者癌痛的认知。有目的的抽样方法被用来包括有经验的参与者谁有问题的现象的知识(Berg, 2009;Sandelowski, 2010)。研究对象为5名二级化疗认证肿瘤学护士。参与者的年龄从32岁到55岁不等,平均在肿瘤领域工作10年。所有可用的参与者都是女性。数据收集采用一对一的半结构化访谈。访谈通常用于收集对护士的看法、观点、感受和经验的深入探索(Garton & Copland, 2010)。问题是开放式的,以允许灵活性和鼓励更丰富的叙述。包括的问题包括:疼痛对你意味着什么?你如何看待癌痛?你的病人报告的疼痛对你的工作有影响吗?当你的病人痛苦时,你有什么感觉?你对有效控制病人的疼痛准备得如何?进一步的提示,在需要的地方,被用来澄清和扩展癌症疼痛管理的相关概念。为了确保数据的准确性,采访被录了下来。转录完成后,进行归纳主题分析,以确定与研究问题相关的代码、类别和主题(Fereday & Muir-Cochrane, 2006)。采用了框架分析方法(Richie & Spencer, 1994)。通过听采访磁带,然后反复阅读笔录,以确保对数据的熟悉,从而实现对原始数据的沉浸。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信