Comparative Analysis of Bone Marrow Aspiration Smears, Touch Imprints and Trephine Biopsy in Haematological Malignancies

S. Pant, H. Dhingra, Anshul Gupta, R. Misra
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Bone Marrow Aspiration Smears, Touch Imprints and Trephine Biopsy in Haematological Malignancies","authors":"S. Pant, H. Dhingra, Anshul Gupta, R. Misra","doi":"10.21276/ijcmr.2020.7.6.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Inspection of the bone marrow is considered one of the most valuable diagnostic tool to evaluate hematologic malignancies. This study compares all three techniques of bone marrow aspiration (BMA), bone marrow imprint (BMI) and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) in morphological diagnosis of hematological malignancies. Material and methods: The study was conducted on 63 selected cases of various hematological malignancies. Only those cases in which bone marrow examination was done by using all the three techniques were included in the study. Results: Out of total 63 cases,53 cases were diagnosed on bone marrow aspirate smears with diagnostic accuracy of 84.12%, 60 cases were diagnosed on bone marrow imprint smears with diagnostic accuracy of 95.23% and all 63 cases were diagnosed on bone marrow biopsy with diagnostic accuracy of 100%. Conclusion: It is concluded that bone marrow imprints are equally useful as bone marrow biopsy in diagnosing hematological malignancies. Imprint cytology should therefore be a standard practice for evaluating bone marrow in cases of hematological malignancies.","PeriodicalId":13918,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research [IJCMR]","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research [IJCMR]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21276/ijcmr.2020.7.6.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Inspection of the bone marrow is considered one of the most valuable diagnostic tool to evaluate hematologic malignancies. This study compares all three techniques of bone marrow aspiration (BMA), bone marrow imprint (BMI) and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) in morphological diagnosis of hematological malignancies. Material and methods: The study was conducted on 63 selected cases of various hematological malignancies. Only those cases in which bone marrow examination was done by using all the three techniques were included in the study. Results: Out of total 63 cases,53 cases were diagnosed on bone marrow aspirate smears with diagnostic accuracy of 84.12%, 60 cases were diagnosed on bone marrow imprint smears with diagnostic accuracy of 95.23% and all 63 cases were diagnosed on bone marrow biopsy with diagnostic accuracy of 100%. Conclusion: It is concluded that bone marrow imprints are equally useful as bone marrow biopsy in diagnosing hematological malignancies. Imprint cytology should therefore be a standard practice for evaluating bone marrow in cases of hematological malignancies.
恶性血液病骨髓穿刺涂片、触摸印迹和环钻活检的比较分析
骨髓检查被认为是评估血液恶性肿瘤最有价值的诊断工具之一。本研究比较了骨髓穿刺(BMA)、骨髓印记(BMI)和骨髓活检(BMB)三种技术在血液系统恶性肿瘤形态学诊断中的应用。材料与方法:选择63例不同类型的恶性血液病为研究对象。只有使用所有三种技术进行骨髓检查的病例被纳入研究。结果:63例患者中,骨髓穿刺涂片诊断53例,诊断准确率为84.12%,骨髓印迹涂片诊断60例,诊断准确率为95.23%,骨髓活检诊断63例,诊断准确率均为100%。结论:骨髓印迹与骨髓活检在血液学恶性肿瘤诊断中的价值相当。因此,印迹细胞学应该成为评估血液恶性肿瘤患者骨髓的标准方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信