Sleep deprivation after septic insult increases mortality independent of age.

R. Friese, Brandon R. Bruns, C. Sinton
{"title":"Sleep deprivation after septic insult increases mortality independent of age.","authors":"R. Friese, Brandon R. Bruns, C. Sinton","doi":"10.1097/TA.0b013e318190c3a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Sleep deprivation is a common problem in the intensive care unit. Animal models have demonstrated that sleep deprivation alone is associated with increased mortality. We have previously shown that septic insult with sleep deprivation results in increased mortality in a murine model. The aging process is known to reduce the restorative phases of sleep. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of age on mortality with sleep deprivation during recovery from septic insult. METHODS C57BL/6J male mice aged 2 months (young) or 9 months (old) underwent cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Animals were randomized to receive sleep interruption (SI) for 48 hours or standard recovery (no SI). Sham animals underwent laparotomy and cecal manipulation without puncture. SI was achieved by securing animal housing to an orbital shaker set to repeatedly cycle at 30 rpm over 120 seconds (30 seconds on/90 seconds off). The primary outcome was survival at 5 days post-CLP. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank test was used to explore differences in mortality. RESULTS SI resulted in an increase in time awake for both light and dark cycles (p < 0.001). Mortality after CLP with SI (n = 30) was 57% and mortality after CLP without SI (controls; n = 33) was 24%. SI was associated with a greater than 3-fold increase in mortality after CLP (RR = 3.29; 95% CI, 1.42-7.63). Young mice (n = 28) had a mortality of 31% with CLP alone increasing to 67% with SI (p = 0.03). Old mice (n = 35) had a mortality of 18% with CLP alone increasing to 50% with SI (p = 0.05). There was no difference in survival between young and old mice undergoing SI (p = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS Sleep deprivation after septic insult increases mortality in both young and old mice. However, sleep deprivation after septic insult does not have a more profound effect on mortality in either age group. These findings suggest that sleep deprivation experienced in the intensive care unit setting during recovery from critical illness may increase mortality. This effect appears independent of increased age. Further studies evaluating extremes of age are warranted.","PeriodicalId":92962,"journal":{"name":"The journal of cardiothoracic trauma","volume":"55 1","pages":"50-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of cardiothoracic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318190c3a1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

BACKGROUND Sleep deprivation is a common problem in the intensive care unit. Animal models have demonstrated that sleep deprivation alone is associated with increased mortality. We have previously shown that septic insult with sleep deprivation results in increased mortality in a murine model. The aging process is known to reduce the restorative phases of sleep. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of age on mortality with sleep deprivation during recovery from septic insult. METHODS C57BL/6J male mice aged 2 months (young) or 9 months (old) underwent cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Animals were randomized to receive sleep interruption (SI) for 48 hours or standard recovery (no SI). Sham animals underwent laparotomy and cecal manipulation without puncture. SI was achieved by securing animal housing to an orbital shaker set to repeatedly cycle at 30 rpm over 120 seconds (30 seconds on/90 seconds off). The primary outcome was survival at 5 days post-CLP. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank test was used to explore differences in mortality. RESULTS SI resulted in an increase in time awake for both light and dark cycles (p < 0.001). Mortality after CLP with SI (n = 30) was 57% and mortality after CLP without SI (controls; n = 33) was 24%. SI was associated with a greater than 3-fold increase in mortality after CLP (RR = 3.29; 95% CI, 1.42-7.63). Young mice (n = 28) had a mortality of 31% with CLP alone increasing to 67% with SI (p = 0.03). Old mice (n = 35) had a mortality of 18% with CLP alone increasing to 50% with SI (p = 0.05). There was no difference in survival between young and old mice undergoing SI (p = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS Sleep deprivation after septic insult increases mortality in both young and old mice. However, sleep deprivation after septic insult does not have a more profound effect on mortality in either age group. These findings suggest that sleep deprivation experienced in the intensive care unit setting during recovery from critical illness may increase mortality. This effect appears independent of increased age. Further studies evaluating extremes of age are warranted.
脓毒性损伤后睡眠不足会增加死亡率,与年龄无关。
背景:睡眠剥夺是重症监护病房的常见问题。动物模型已经证明,睡眠不足本身就与死亡率增加有关。我们之前已经在小鼠模型中表明,脓毒性损伤与睡眠剥夺会导致死亡率增加。众所周知,衰老过程会减少恢复性睡眠阶段。本研究的目的是评估年龄对脓毒性损伤恢复期睡眠剥夺患者死亡率的影响。方法对2月龄和9月龄雄性小鼠sc57bl /6J进行盲肠结扎穿刺(CLP)。动物随机接受48小时睡眠中断(SI)或标准恢复(无SI)。假动物行开腹和盲肠操作,不穿刺。通过将动物外壳固定在轨道激振器上,以30转/分的速度重复循环120秒(开30秒/关90秒),可以实现SI。主要终点是clp后5天的生存。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和log-rank检验来探讨死亡率的差异。结果si导致明暗周期清醒时间增加(p < 0.001)。CLP合并SI后的死亡率(n = 30)为57%,CLP不合并SI后的死亡率(对照;N = 33)为24%。SI与CLP后死亡率增加3倍以上相关(RR = 3.29;95% ci, 1.42-7.63)。CLP组幼鼠(n = 28)的死亡率为31%,SI组为67% (p = 0.03)。老龄小鼠(n = 35) CLP组死亡率为18%,SI组死亡率为50% (p = 0.05)。接受SI治疗的年轻和年老小鼠的存活率没有差异(p = 0.49)。结论脓毒性损伤后睡眠剥夺会增加幼龄和老年小鼠的死亡率。然而,脓毒性损伤后的睡眠剥夺对两个年龄组的死亡率都没有更深远的影响。这些发现表明,在重症监护病房环境中,在危重疾病恢复期间,睡眠剥夺可能会增加死亡率。这种影响似乎与年龄的增长无关。评估年龄极限的进一步研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信