{"title":"The “Eurasian Question”","authors":"Liesbeth Rosen Jacobson","doi":"10.3167/trans.2018.080306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the arrangements that authorities put in place for populations\nof mixed ancestry from two former colonies in Asia—the Dutch East\nIndies and British India—and compares them with those of French Indochina\nduring decolonization. These people of mixed ancestry, or “Eurasians,” as they\nwere commonly called at the time, were a heterogeneous group. Some could\npass themselves off as Europeans, while others were seen as indigenous people.\nThe arrangements were negotiated during round table conferences, at\nwhich decolonization in all three colonies was prepared. Which agreements\nwere made, what consequences did they have, and how and why did these differ\nacross the three colonial contexts? To answer these questions, I use material\nfrom governmental archives from all three former colonial contexts. The\narticle shows that information on the paternal ancestry of Eurasians was decisive\nin the allocation of European citizenship and admission to the colonizing\ncountry.","PeriodicalId":43789,"journal":{"name":"Transfers-Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfers-Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/trans.2018.080306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
This article examines the arrangements that authorities put in place for populations
of mixed ancestry from two former colonies in Asia—the Dutch East
Indies and British India—and compares them with those of French Indochina
during decolonization. These people of mixed ancestry, or “Eurasians,” as they
were commonly called at the time, were a heterogeneous group. Some could
pass themselves off as Europeans, while others were seen as indigenous people.
The arrangements were negotiated during round table conferences, at
which decolonization in all three colonies was prepared. Which agreements
were made, what consequences did they have, and how and why did these differ
across the three colonial contexts? To answer these questions, I use material
from governmental archives from all three former colonial contexts. The
article shows that information on the paternal ancestry of Eurasians was decisive
in the allocation of European citizenship and admission to the colonizing
country.