Elective Revisions after Breast Reconstruction: Results from the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium.

J. Nelson, S. Voineskos, Ji Qi, Hyungjin Kim, J. Hamill, E. Wilkins, A. Pusic
{"title":"Elective Revisions after Breast Reconstruction: Results from the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium.","authors":"J. Nelson, S. Voineskos, Ji Qi, Hyungjin Kim, J. Hamill, E. Wilkins, A. Pusic","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000006225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nRates of breast reconstruction following mastectomy continue to increase. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of elective revision surgery and the number of procedures required to achieve a stable breast reconstruction 2 years after mastectomy.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWomen undergoing first-time breast reconstruction after mastectomy were enrolled and followed for 2 years, with completion of reconstruction occurring in 1996. Patients were classified based on the absence or presence of complications. Comparisons within cohorts were performed to determine factors associated with revisions and total procedures. Mixed-effects regression modeling identified factors associated with elective revisions and total operations.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOverall, 1534 patients (76.9 percent) had no complications, among whom 40.2 percent underwent elective revisions. The average number of elective revisions differed by modality (p < 0.001), with abdominally based free autologous reconstruction patients undergoing the greatest number of elective revisions (mean, 0.7). The mean total number of procedures also differed (p < 0.001), with tissue expander/implant reconstruction patients undergoing the greatest total number of procedures (mean, 2.4). Complications occurred in 462 patients (23.1 percent), with 67.1 percent of these patients undergoing elective revisions, which was significantly higher than among patients without complications (p < 0.001). The mean number of procedures again differed by modality (p < 0.001) and followed similar trends, but with an increased mean number of revisions and procedures overall. Mixed-effects regression modeling demonstrated that patients experiencing complications had increased odds of undergoing elective revision procedures (OR, 3.2; p < 0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nBreast reconstruction patients without complications undergo over two procedures on average to achieve satisfactory reconstruction, with 40 percent electing revisions. If a complication occurs, the number of procedures increases.\n\n\nCLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE\nRisk, II.","PeriodicalId":20168,"journal":{"name":"Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

BACKGROUND Rates of breast reconstruction following mastectomy continue to increase. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of elective revision surgery and the number of procedures required to achieve a stable breast reconstruction 2 years after mastectomy. METHODS Women undergoing first-time breast reconstruction after mastectomy were enrolled and followed for 2 years, with completion of reconstruction occurring in 1996. Patients were classified based on the absence or presence of complications. Comparisons within cohorts were performed to determine factors associated with revisions and total procedures. Mixed-effects regression modeling identified factors associated with elective revisions and total operations. RESULTS Overall, 1534 patients (76.9 percent) had no complications, among whom 40.2 percent underwent elective revisions. The average number of elective revisions differed by modality (p < 0.001), with abdominally based free autologous reconstruction patients undergoing the greatest number of elective revisions (mean, 0.7). The mean total number of procedures also differed (p < 0.001), with tissue expander/implant reconstruction patients undergoing the greatest total number of procedures (mean, 2.4). Complications occurred in 462 patients (23.1 percent), with 67.1 percent of these patients undergoing elective revisions, which was significantly higher than among patients without complications (p < 0.001). The mean number of procedures again differed by modality (p < 0.001) and followed similar trends, but with an increased mean number of revisions and procedures overall. Mixed-effects regression modeling demonstrated that patients experiencing complications had increased odds of undergoing elective revision procedures (OR, 3.2; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Breast reconstruction patients without complications undergo over two procedures on average to achieve satisfactory reconstruction, with 40 percent electing revisions. If a complication occurs, the number of procedures increases. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Risk, II.
乳房重建后的选择性修复:来自乳房切除术重建结果联盟的结果。
背景:乳房切除术后乳房重建的比率持续增加。本研究的目的是确定选择性翻修手术的频率和乳房切除术后2年实现稳定乳房重建所需的手术次数。方法入选乳房切除术后首次乳房重建的女性,随访2年,于1996年完成重建。根据有无并发症对患者进行分类。在队列内进行比较,以确定与修订和总程序相关的因素。混合效应回归模型确定了与选择性修订和总手术相关的因素。结果1534例(76.9%)患者无并发症,其中40.2%的患者进行了选择性翻修。选择性翻修的平均次数因手术方式不同而不同(p < 0.001),以腹部为基础的游离自体重建患者进行的选择性翻修次数最多(平均为0.7次)。手术的平均总次数也不同(p < 0.001),组织扩张器/种植体重建患者接受手术的总次数最多(平均2.4次)。462例患者(23.1%)出现并发症,其中67.1%的患者接受了选择性翻修,显著高于无并发症患者(p < 0.001)。手术的平均次数再次因手术方式不同而不同(p < 0.001),并遵循类似的趋势,但总体上平均手术次数和手术次数增加。混合效应回归模型显示,出现并发症的患者接受选择性翻修手术的几率增加(OR, 3.2;P < 0.001)。结论无并发症的乳房再造术患者平均接受两次以上手术即可获得满意的再造术效果,其中40%的患者选择再造术。如果出现并发症,手术次数就会增加。临床问题/证据风险水平,2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信