Comprehending the Сoncept of Сulture War in Serbian Сultures Studies, Philosophy of Culture and Literature

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
I. Tsibizova
{"title":"Comprehending the Сoncept of Сulture War in Serbian Сultures Studies, Philosophy of Culture and Literature","authors":"I. Tsibizova","doi":"10.37816/2073-9567-2023-67-45-67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theme of culture wars connected with the preserving of national identity and mentality’s especially actual for Serbia which applies for the role of the bridge between West and East. The term of culture war was coined by R. Virchow for the definition of German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck’s struggle against the catholic clergy. After the use of the notion by the sociologist J. Hunter and politician P. Buchahan the concept gained an unusual popularity among the researches. The origins of the Serbian culture wars are connected to the fight for national independency and either the Russian or the Western mainly to Habsburg Empire orientation. The J. Raich’s Catechism’s viewed as one of the important victories in culture war. These wars are understood as a violent conflict between the carriers of opposing ideas, definitions and representations within a single cultural pattern or between the representatives of such different ones. In the radical conflicts the “killer identity” (Amin Maalouf) is born. The culture wars often precede the real ones which destroy the culture. The National Revival inspired by the spiritual leader of the First Serbian insurrection Dosifey Obradovic, the unsuccessful attempt to introduce a single Serbo-Croatian language, the Yugoslav model, created in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, later Yugoslavia in the transition period, the communist stage associated with changes in society after the Second World War, the denial of national tradition and open hatred for the Serbian one as such, the period after 2000, marked by abuses of privatization, the ruin of the economy, the uncritical definition of Serbia as the Western Balkans, the euphemistic understanding of the period as a transition to democracy, covering the restoration of neoliberal capitalism and sabotage of the “democratic authorities” of the serious study of national culture, the war over the school curriculum of teaching history, language and literature, challenging the value of outstanding literary works as well as the values of national identity are considered as milestones of the culture was in Serbia. The participants of the culture wars are divided into globalists oriented to the West and the traditionalists or the conservatives, who tries not only to develop a concept of Serbian national identity, but also to maintain it. K. Atanasievich and V. Dvornikovich have contributed greatly to its development. The paper highlights a negative impact of pro-Western elites not only on national identity, but also on the country`s future. The consolidation of society around Patriarch Pavel showed the relevance of Orthodoxy, as well as of Kosovo and Metohija, for the Serbian national identity. The planned Euro-pride in Belgrade is perceived as a threat to the latter. Another threat is the canonization of the Quisling Croatian bishop Alozij Stepinets and the presentation of the Ustashe children's camps Sisak and Yastrebarsko as sanatoriums for the “treatment” of Serbian orphans. A developed concept of national identity is therefore needed to win the culture war.","PeriodicalId":41255,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Slavianskikh Kultur-Bulletin of Slavic Cultures-Scientific and Informational Journal","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Slavianskikh Kultur-Bulletin of Slavic Cultures-Scientific and Informational Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37816/2073-9567-2023-67-45-67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The theme of culture wars connected with the preserving of national identity and mentality’s especially actual for Serbia which applies for the role of the bridge between West and East. The term of culture war was coined by R. Virchow for the definition of German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck’s struggle against the catholic clergy. After the use of the notion by the sociologist J. Hunter and politician P. Buchahan the concept gained an unusual popularity among the researches. The origins of the Serbian culture wars are connected to the fight for national independency and either the Russian or the Western mainly to Habsburg Empire orientation. The J. Raich’s Catechism’s viewed as one of the important victories in culture war. These wars are understood as a violent conflict between the carriers of opposing ideas, definitions and representations within a single cultural pattern or between the representatives of such different ones. In the radical conflicts the “killer identity” (Amin Maalouf) is born. The culture wars often precede the real ones which destroy the culture. The National Revival inspired by the spiritual leader of the First Serbian insurrection Dosifey Obradovic, the unsuccessful attempt to introduce a single Serbo-Croatian language, the Yugoslav model, created in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, later Yugoslavia in the transition period, the communist stage associated with changes in society after the Second World War, the denial of national tradition and open hatred for the Serbian one as such, the period after 2000, marked by abuses of privatization, the ruin of the economy, the uncritical definition of Serbia as the Western Balkans, the euphemistic understanding of the period as a transition to democracy, covering the restoration of neoliberal capitalism and sabotage of the “democratic authorities” of the serious study of national culture, the war over the school curriculum of teaching history, language and literature, challenging the value of outstanding literary works as well as the values of national identity are considered as milestones of the culture was in Serbia. The participants of the culture wars are divided into globalists oriented to the West and the traditionalists or the conservatives, who tries not only to develop a concept of Serbian national identity, but also to maintain it. K. Atanasievich and V. Dvornikovich have contributed greatly to its development. The paper highlights a negative impact of pro-Western elites not only on national identity, but also on the country`s future. The consolidation of society around Patriarch Pavel showed the relevance of Orthodoxy, as well as of Kosovo and Metohija, for the Serbian national identity. The planned Euro-pride in Belgrade is perceived as a threat to the latter. Another threat is the canonization of the Quisling Croatian bishop Alozij Stepinets and the presentation of the Ustashe children's camps Sisak and Yastrebarsko as sanatoriums for the “treatment” of Serbian orphans. A developed concept of national identity is therefore needed to win the culture war.
对Сoncept Сulture塞尔维亚战争的理解Сultures研究、文化哲学与文学
文化战争的主题与维护民族认同和心态有关,特别是对塞尔维亚来说,这适用于东西方之间的桥梁作用。“文化战争”一词是由R. Virchow创造的,用于定义德国总理奥托·冯·俾斯麦与天主教神职人员的斗争。在社会学家J. Hunter和政治家P. Buchahan使用这个概念之后,这个概念在研究中得到了不同寻常的普及。塞尔维亚文化战争的起源与争取民族独立的斗争有关,无论是俄罗斯还是西方,主要是哈布斯堡帝国的取向。《赖希要理问答》被视为文化战争中的重要胜利之一。这些战争被理解为一种单一文化模式中对立思想、定义和表现的载体之间的暴力冲突,或者是不同文化模式的代表之间的暴力冲突。在激进的冲突中,“杀手身份”(阿明·马卢夫饰)诞生了。文化战争往往发生在破坏文化的真正战争之前。第一次塞尔维亚起义的精神领袖多西菲·奥布拉多维奇所激发的民族复兴;在塞尔维亚人、克罗地亚人和斯洛文尼亚人王国(后来的南斯拉夫)过渡时期推行单一塞尔维亚-克罗地亚语的不成功尝试,即南斯拉夫模式;与第二次世界大战后社会变化有关的共产主义阶段;2000年以后对民族传统的否定和对塞尔维亚传统本身的公开仇恨;其特点是滥用私有化、经济崩溃、不加批判地将塞尔维亚定义为西巴尔干、将这一时期委婉地理解为向民主过渡、包括恢复新自由主义资本主义和破坏认真研究民族文化的“民主当局”、对历史、语言和文学教学课程的战争,挑战杰出文学作品的价值以及民族认同的价值被认为是塞尔维亚文化的里程碑。文化战争的参与者分为面向西方的全球主义者和传统主义者或保守主义者,后者不仅试图发展一种塞尔维亚民族认同的概念,而且还试图维持这种概念。K. Atanasievich和V. Dvornikovich为其发展做出了巨大贡献。这篇论文强调了亲西方精英不仅对国家认同,而且对国家未来的负面影响。帕维尔宗主教周围的社会巩固表明了东正教,以及科索沃和梅托希亚对塞尔维亚民族认同的相关性。计划在贝尔格莱德举行的欧洲骄傲游行被认为是对后者的威胁。另一个威胁是吉斯林克罗地亚主教Alozij Stepinets的封圣,以及乌斯塔什儿童营地Sisak和Yastrebarsko作为“治疗”塞尔维亚孤儿的疗养院。因此,要赢得这场文化战争,就需要一个发达的民族认同概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信