Don't Count on Us Dying: Carceral Accuracy and Trans-of-Color Life Beyond Hate Crimes

IF 0.5 Q3 SOCIAL ISSUES
Ren-yo Hwang
{"title":"Don't Count on Us Dying: Carceral Accuracy and Trans-of-Color Life Beyond Hate Crimes","authors":"Ren-yo Hwang","doi":"10.14321/qed.9.issue-3.0077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article explores the phenomenon of \"carceral accuracy\" in order to index how minoritarian participation into state antiviolence measures continues to reproduce and prioritize social scientific, criminological, and quantitative data-driven efforts to rationalize crime and punishment as a necessity for disrupting bias-motivated violence. In Los Angeles from 2014 to 2015, in the span of just five months the premature and violent deaths of three transgender women of color would exacerbate longstanding political rifts in the trans and queer community. These rifts formed along the lines of either divestment or reinvestment in criminal policy and legislation via a call for prosecution of \"anti-trans hate crimes.\" Considering that over the last four decades Los Angeles has been lauded for its progressive LGBT policies and inclusive policing reforms, this article traces how trans and queer community safety agendas have become so easily conflated with policing and imprisonment technologies that presume to speculate, track, manage, and inoculate social risk. Focusing on examples such as former LAPD (Los Angeles Police Department) Chief Charlie Beck's 2012 LGBT Police Forum proclamation of a \"transgender progressive paramilitarism\" to the LAPD's 2015 \"Transgender Walk of Remembrance,\" these instances of \"trans inclusive\" pro-policing efforts demonstrate how antiviolence coalitions remain tied to carceral outcomes by way of routinized and compulsory participation in criminological discourse and technologies cloaked in the rhetoric of public safety. In conclusion, this article asks how carceral coalitions are maintained through law enforcement agencies' control of select community partnerships that prioritize how we count crime and who is represented in crime data. Carceral accuracy thus wrestles with the shared cultural preoccupation with upholding a mythos that \"cold calculations,\" such as the counting of trans deaths, can provide any relief or disruption to anti-trans violence. In the end, what remains unshakeable in the wake of such violence is a heteropatriarchal and white supremacist possessive investment in improving criminal data.","PeriodicalId":43840,"journal":{"name":"QED-A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking","volume":"34 1","pages":"108 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QED-A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/qed.9.issue-3.0077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:This article explores the phenomenon of "carceral accuracy" in order to index how minoritarian participation into state antiviolence measures continues to reproduce and prioritize social scientific, criminological, and quantitative data-driven efforts to rationalize crime and punishment as a necessity for disrupting bias-motivated violence. In Los Angeles from 2014 to 2015, in the span of just five months the premature and violent deaths of three transgender women of color would exacerbate longstanding political rifts in the trans and queer community. These rifts formed along the lines of either divestment or reinvestment in criminal policy and legislation via a call for prosecution of "anti-trans hate crimes." Considering that over the last four decades Los Angeles has been lauded for its progressive LGBT policies and inclusive policing reforms, this article traces how trans and queer community safety agendas have become so easily conflated with policing and imprisonment technologies that presume to speculate, track, manage, and inoculate social risk. Focusing on examples such as former LAPD (Los Angeles Police Department) Chief Charlie Beck's 2012 LGBT Police Forum proclamation of a "transgender progressive paramilitarism" to the LAPD's 2015 "Transgender Walk of Remembrance," these instances of "trans inclusive" pro-policing efforts demonstrate how antiviolence coalitions remain tied to carceral outcomes by way of routinized and compulsory participation in criminological discourse and technologies cloaked in the rhetoric of public safety. In conclusion, this article asks how carceral coalitions are maintained through law enforcement agencies' control of select community partnerships that prioritize how we count crime and who is represented in crime data. Carceral accuracy thus wrestles with the shared cultural preoccupation with upholding a mythos that "cold calculations," such as the counting of trans deaths, can provide any relief or disruption to anti-trans violence. In the end, what remains unshakeable in the wake of such violence is a heteropatriarchal and white supremacist possessive investment in improving criminal data.
别指望我们会死:仇恨犯罪之外的癌症准确性和跨肤色生活
摘要:本文探讨了“暴力准确性”现象,以索引少数民族参与国家反暴力措施如何继续复制和优先考虑社会科学,犯罪学和定量数据驱动的努力,以使犯罪和惩罚合理化,作为破坏偏见动机暴力的必要条件。从2014年到2015年,在短短五个月的时间里,三名有色人种跨性别女性的过早暴力死亡加剧了跨性别和酷儿群体长期以来的政治分歧。这些分歧是在通过起诉“反跨性别仇恨犯罪”的呼吁,对刑事政策和立法进行撤资或再投资的过程中形成的。考虑到在过去的四十年里,洛杉矶一直因其进步的LGBT政策和包容性的警务改革而受到称赞,本文追溯了跨性别和酷儿社区安全议程是如何轻易地与警务和监禁技术混为一谈的,这些技术假定是在推测、跟踪、管理和预防社会风险。以前洛杉矶警察局局长查理·贝克2012年在LGBT警察论坛上宣布的“跨性别进步准军事主义”和洛杉矶警察局2015年的“跨性别纪念游行”为例,这些“包容跨性别”的亲警察努力的实例表明,反暴力联盟如何通过常规和强制参与犯罪学话语和技术的方式与暴力结果联系在一起,这些话语和技术都隐藏在公共安全的修辞之下。总之,本文探讨了执法机构如何通过控制选定的社区伙伴关系来维持执法联盟,这些伙伴关系优先考虑我们如何统计犯罪以及犯罪数据中代表谁。因此,严谨的准确性与一种共同的文化关注相斗争,这种关注坚持一种神话,即“冷静的计算”,比如计算跨性别者的死亡人数,可以缓解或破坏反跨性别暴力。最终,在这些暴力事件之后,仍然不可动摇的是父权制和白人至上主义者对改善犯罪数据的占有欲投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信