Effects of minimum drinking age laws: review and analyses of the literature from 1960 to 2000.

A. Wagenaar, T. Toomey
{"title":"Effects of minimum drinking age laws: review and analyses of the literature from 1960 to 2000.","authors":"A. Wagenaar, T. Toomey","doi":"10.15288/JSAS.2002.S14.206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThe goal of this article is to review critically the extant minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) research literature and summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the effectiveness of this policy.\n\n\nMETHOD\nComprehensive searches of four databases were conducted to identify empirical studies of the MLDA published from 1960 to 1999. Three variables were coded for each study regarding methodological quality: (1) sampling design, (2) study design and (3) presence or absence of comparison group.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWe identified 241 empirical analyses of the MLDA. Fifty-six percent of the analyses met our criteria for high methodological quality. Of the 33 higher quality studies of MLDA and alcohol consumption, 11 (33%) found an inverse relationship; only 1 found the opposite. Similarly, of the 79 higher quality analyses of MLDA and traffic crashes, 46 (58%) found a higher MLDA related to decreased traffic crashes; none found the opposite. Eight of the 23 analyses of other problems found a higher MLDA associated with reduced problems; none found the opposite. Only 6 of the 64 college-specific studies (9%) were of high quality; none found a significant relationship between the MLDA and outcome measures.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe preponderance of evidence indicates there is an inverse relationship between the MLDA and two outcome measures: alcohol consumption and traffic crashes. The quality of the studies of specific populations such as college students is poor, preventing any conclusions that the effects of MLDA might differ for such special populations.","PeriodicalId":17056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement","volume":"17 1","pages":"206-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"508","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/JSAS.2002.S14.206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 508

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The goal of this article is to review critically the extant minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) research literature and summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the effectiveness of this policy. METHOD Comprehensive searches of four databases were conducted to identify empirical studies of the MLDA published from 1960 to 1999. Three variables were coded for each study regarding methodological quality: (1) sampling design, (2) study design and (3) presence or absence of comparison group. RESULTS We identified 241 empirical analyses of the MLDA. Fifty-six percent of the analyses met our criteria for high methodological quality. Of the 33 higher quality studies of MLDA and alcohol consumption, 11 (33%) found an inverse relationship; only 1 found the opposite. Similarly, of the 79 higher quality analyses of MLDA and traffic crashes, 46 (58%) found a higher MLDA related to decreased traffic crashes; none found the opposite. Eight of the 23 analyses of other problems found a higher MLDA associated with reduced problems; none found the opposite. Only 6 of the 64 college-specific studies (9%) were of high quality; none found a significant relationship between the MLDA and outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS The preponderance of evidence indicates there is an inverse relationship between the MLDA and two outcome measures: alcohol consumption and traffic crashes. The quality of the studies of specific populations such as college students is poor, preventing any conclusions that the effects of MLDA might differ for such special populations.
最低饮酒年龄法律的影响:1960年至2000年文献回顾与分析。
本文的目的是批判性地回顾现有的最低法定饮酒年龄(MLDA)研究文献,并总结目前关于该政策有效性的知识状况。方法综合检索4个数据库,对1960 ~ 1999年发表的MLDA的实证研究进行梳理。关于方法学质量,每个研究编码三个变量:(1)抽样设计,(2)研究设计和(3)是否存在对照组。结果共筛选了241个MLDA实证分析。56%的分析符合我们的高方法学质量标准。在33项关于MLDA和饮酒的高质量研究中,11项(33%)发现了负相关;只有我的发现正好相反。同样,在79个更高质量的MLDA和交通事故分析中,46个(58%)发现更高的MLDA与交通事故减少有关;没有人发现相反的情况。在对其他问题的23项分析中,有8项发现,MLDA越高,问题越少;没有人发现相反的情况。64个大学专项研究中只有6个(9%)是高质量的;没有发现MLDA和结果测量之间的显著关系。结论:大量证据表明,MLDA与两项结局指标:酒精消耗和交通事故之间存在负相关关系。对特定人群(如大学生)的研究质量很差,因此无法得出MLDA对这些特殊人群的影响可能有所不同的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信