Análise da concordância entre instrumentos de avaliação do equilíbrio corporal em idosos

Aline Harumi Karuka, José Adolfo Menezes Garcia Silva, Marcelo Tavella Navega
{"title":"Análise da concordância entre instrumentos de avaliação do equilíbrio corporal em idosos","authors":"Aline Harumi Karuka, José Adolfo Menezes Garcia Silva, Marcelo Tavella Navega","doi":"10.1590/S1413-35552011000600006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of clinical parameters associated with falls in the elderly has become a major challenge for the scientific community. Despite the existence of several tools aiming to assess body balance in the elderly, it is still scarce the number of studies that have investigated and discussed the agreement between different methods. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the correlation between tests used to assess the body balance in the elderly. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, observational study conducted with 30 healthy female community-dwelling elderly volunteers with different levels of physical conditioning. The Functional Reach Test (FRT), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and the Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment of Balance (POMA) were used. The data analysis was performed by using the Spearmam's rank correlation coefficient, with a significance level of 5% (p<0.05). RESULTS: There was positive and moderate correlation between the FRT and BBS (r=0.4845, p=0.0067), between FRT and POMA (r=0.4136, p=0.0231), and between BBS and POMA (r=0.6088, p=0.0004). CONCLUSION: The tests are complementary since they showed specific and distinct limitations. It is reasonable, therefore, to use these instruments together to get better assessment of elderly body balance.","PeriodicalId":21195,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","volume":"9 6 1","pages":"460-466"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"109","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552011000600006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 109

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of clinical parameters associated with falls in the elderly has become a major challenge for the scientific community. Despite the existence of several tools aiming to assess body balance in the elderly, it is still scarce the number of studies that have investigated and discussed the agreement between different methods. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the correlation between tests used to assess the body balance in the elderly. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, observational study conducted with 30 healthy female community-dwelling elderly volunteers with different levels of physical conditioning. The Functional Reach Test (FRT), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and the Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment of Balance (POMA) were used. The data analysis was performed by using the Spearmam's rank correlation coefficient, with a significance level of 5% (p<0.05). RESULTS: There was positive and moderate correlation between the FRT and BBS (r=0.4845, p=0.0067), between FRT and POMA (r=0.4136, p=0.0231), and between BBS and POMA (r=0.6088, p=0.0004). CONCLUSION: The tests are complementary since they showed specific and distinct limitations. It is reasonable, therefore, to use these instruments together to get better assessment of elderly body balance.
老年人身体平衡评估工具的一致性分析
背景:与老年人跌倒相关的临床参数的诊断已成为科学界面临的主要挑战。尽管存在几种旨在评估老年人身体平衡的工具,但调查和讨论不同方法之间一致性的研究数量仍然很少。目的:分析评估老年人身体平衡的各项指标之间的相关性。方法:这是一项横断面观察性研究,对30名健康女性社区老年志愿者进行了不同水平的身体调节。采用功能够远测试(FRT)、伯格平衡量表(BBS)、计时起走量表(TUG)和性能导向的平衡机动性评估量表(POMA)。采用spearman秩相关系数进行数据分析,显著性水平为5% (p<0.05)。结果:FRT与BBS呈正相关(r=0.4845, p=0.0067), FRT与POMA呈正相关(r=0.4136, p=0.0231), BBS与POMA呈正相关(r=0.6088, p=0.0004)。结论:两种方法都有各自的局限性,具有一定的互补性。因此,综合使用这些仪器可以更好地评估老年人的身体平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信