Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Posterior Wall Isolation During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

A. Thiyagarajah, K. Kadhim, D. Lau, M. Emami, D. Linz, K. Khokhar, D. Munawar, R. Mishima, V. Malik, C. O’Shea, R. Mahajan, P. Sanders
{"title":"Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Posterior Wall Isolation During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.","authors":"A. Thiyagarajah, K. Kadhim, D. Lau, M. Emami, D. Linz, K. Khokhar, D. Munawar, R. Mishima, V. Malik, C. O’Shea, R. Mahajan, P. Sanders","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe posterior left atrium is an arrhythmogenic substrate that contributes to the initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of posterior wall isolation (PWI) as an AF ablation strategy has not been widely reported.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies performing PWI to assess (1) acute procedural success including the ability to achieve PWI and the number of procedure-related complications, (2) Long-term, clinical success including rates of arrhythmia recurrence and posterior wall reconnection, and (3) The efficacy of PWI compared with pulmonary vein isolation on preventing arrhythmia recurrence. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched in May 2018 to retrieve relevant studies. Results were pooled using a random effects model.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSeventeen studies (13 box isolation, 3 single ring isolation, and 1 debulking ablation) comprising 1643 patients (31.3% paroxysmal AF, left atrial diameter 41±3.1 mm) were included in the final analysis. In studies focusing specifically on PWI, the acute procedural success rate for achieving PWI was 94.1% (95% CI, 87.2%-99.3%). Single-procedure 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia was 65.3% (95% CI, 57.7%-73.9%) overall and 61.9% (54.2%-70.8%) for persistent AF. Randomized control trials comparing PWI to pulmonary vein isolation (3 studies, 444 patients) yielded conflicting results and could not confirm an incremental benefit to PWI. Fifteen major complications (0.1%), including 2 atrio-esophageal fistulas, were reported.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPWI as an end point of AF ablation can be achieved in a large proportion of cases with good rates of 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia. Although the procedure-related complication rate is low, it did not eliminate the risk of atrio-esophageal fistula. Registration: URL: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018107212.","PeriodicalId":10167,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"58","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

Abstract

BACKGROUND The posterior left atrium is an arrhythmogenic substrate that contributes to the initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of posterior wall isolation (PWI) as an AF ablation strategy has not been widely reported. METHODS We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies performing PWI to assess (1) acute procedural success including the ability to achieve PWI and the number of procedure-related complications, (2) Long-term, clinical success including rates of arrhythmia recurrence and posterior wall reconnection, and (3) The efficacy of PWI compared with pulmonary vein isolation on preventing arrhythmia recurrence. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched in May 2018 to retrieve relevant studies. Results were pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS Seventeen studies (13 box isolation, 3 single ring isolation, and 1 debulking ablation) comprising 1643 patients (31.3% paroxysmal AF, left atrial diameter 41±3.1 mm) were included in the final analysis. In studies focusing specifically on PWI, the acute procedural success rate for achieving PWI was 94.1% (95% CI, 87.2%-99.3%). Single-procedure 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia was 65.3% (95% CI, 57.7%-73.9%) overall and 61.9% (54.2%-70.8%) for persistent AF. Randomized control trials comparing PWI to pulmonary vein isolation (3 studies, 444 patients) yielded conflicting results and could not confirm an incremental benefit to PWI. Fifteen major complications (0.1%), including 2 atrio-esophageal fistulas, were reported. CONCLUSIONS PWI as an end point of AF ablation can be achieved in a large proportion of cases with good rates of 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia. Although the procedure-related complication rate is low, it did not eliminate the risk of atrio-esophageal fistula. Registration: URL: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018107212.
房颤消融中后壁隔离的可行性、安全性和有效性。
背景左后心房是诱发心律失常的底物,有助于心房颤动(AF)的发生和维持;然而,后壁隔离(PWI)作为房颤消融策略的可行性、安全性和有效性尚未得到广泛报道。方法我们对实施PWI的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估(1)急性手术成功(包括实现PWI的能力和手术相关并发症的数量),(2)长期临床成功(包括心律失常复发率和后壁重连率),以及(3)PWI与肺静脉隔离在预防心律失常复发方面的效果。2018年5月检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Web of Science数据库检索相关研究。结果采用随机效应模型汇总。结果17项研究共纳入1643例患者(阵发性房颤31.3%,左房内径41±3.1 mm),其中箱体隔离13例,单环隔离3例,消融术1例。在专门针对PWI的研究中,实现PWI的急性手术成功率为94.1% (95% CI, 87.2%-99.3%)。单次手术12个月房性心律失常的总体自由率为65.3% (95% CI, 57.7%-73.9%),持续性房颤的自由率为61.9%(54.2%-70.8%)。比较PWI与肺静脉隔离的随机对照试验(3项研究,444例患者)得出了相互矛盾的结果,不能证实PWI有增加的益处。报告了15例主要并发症(0.1%),包括2例心房-食管瘘。结论spwi作为房颤消融术的终点,在房颤12个月无心律失常的患者中可达到较高比例。虽然手术相关并发症发生率较低,但并不能消除房-食管瘘的风险。注册地址:http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42018107212。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信