Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus conventional technique for caudal block in paediatric patients

Kanika Gupta, Swati Agarwal, Rajesh Misra
{"title":"Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus conventional technique for caudal block in paediatric patients","authors":"Kanika Gupta, Swati Agarwal, Rajesh Misra","doi":"10.18231/j.ijca.2023.056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Caudal blocks have been recommended for surgical procedures mainly below umbilicus. Their use has increased in paediatric cases as they are easy to perform with low complication rates. There have been reports of this technique being performed as a sole anaesthetic in children who may not be a suitable candidate for general anaesthesia. This study was conducted with an aim to compare the traditionally used landmark guided technique of caudal block with ultrasound-guided technique in terms of intra-operative analgesia, haemodynamic parameters, time required to perform block and demand for rescue analgesia.This prospective randomized comparative study was carried out in 68 paediatric patients divided in two study groups (Group C and Group U) undergoing elective lower gastrointestinal and genito-urinary tract surgeries over a period of two years in a tertiary care hospital.The intra-operative haemodynamic parameters were comparable in both the groups. There was a significant increase in time taken to perform the block in Group U as compared to Group C (6.5 minutes v/s 15 minutes) (p-value <0.001). The success rate at first puncture was 52.2% in Group C and 47.8% in Group U. The majority of patients were relaxed and comfortable in the 1st hour post-operatively. The requirement of rescue analgesia in the post-operative period was comparable in both the groups. The conventional technique is easier and less time consuming as compared to the ultrasound-guided technique, which is newer and the practitioner needs expertise. The quality of analgesia provided by both the techniques is comparable. The frequency of complications associated with the block are fewer with the ultrasound-guided approach. Ultrasonography is the modality of choice specially in cases where detection of sacral anatomy and landmarks is difficult. However, further studies are needed to establish the role of ultrasonography in performing caudal block.","PeriodicalId":13310,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","volume":"351 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2023.056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Caudal blocks have been recommended for surgical procedures mainly below umbilicus. Their use has increased in paediatric cases as they are easy to perform with low complication rates. There have been reports of this technique being performed as a sole anaesthetic in children who may not be a suitable candidate for general anaesthesia. This study was conducted with an aim to compare the traditionally used landmark guided technique of caudal block with ultrasound-guided technique in terms of intra-operative analgesia, haemodynamic parameters, time required to perform block and demand for rescue analgesia.This prospective randomized comparative study was carried out in 68 paediatric patients divided in two study groups (Group C and Group U) undergoing elective lower gastrointestinal and genito-urinary tract surgeries over a period of two years in a tertiary care hospital.The intra-operative haemodynamic parameters were comparable in both the groups. There was a significant increase in time taken to perform the block in Group U as compared to Group C (6.5 minutes v/s 15 minutes) (p-value <0.001). The success rate at first puncture was 52.2% in Group C and 47.8% in Group U. The majority of patients were relaxed and comfortable in the 1st hour post-operatively. The requirement of rescue analgesia in the post-operative period was comparable in both the groups. The conventional technique is easier and less time consuming as compared to the ultrasound-guided technique, which is newer and the practitioner needs expertise. The quality of analgesia provided by both the techniques is comparable. The frequency of complications associated with the block are fewer with the ultrasound-guided approach. Ultrasonography is the modality of choice specially in cases where detection of sacral anatomy and landmarks is difficult. However, further studies are needed to establish the role of ultrasonography in performing caudal block.
超声引导与常规技术治疗小儿尾侧阻滞的比较
尾侧阻滞被推荐用于主要在脐部以下的外科手术。它们在儿科病例中的使用有所增加,因为它们易于操作且并发症发生率低。有报道称,该技术作为儿童的唯一麻醉,可能不适合全身麻醉。本研究的目的是比较传统的标志性引导技术与超声引导技术在术中镇痛、血流动力学参数、阻滞时间和抢救镇痛需求等方面的差异。这项前瞻性随机比较研究在68名儿科患者中进行,分为两组(C组和U组),在一家三级护理医院进行了两年的选择性下胃肠道和生殖泌尿道手术。两组术中血流动力学参数具有可比性。与C组相比,U组执行阻滞所需的时间显着增加(6.5分钟v/s 15分钟)(p值<0.001)。C组和u组首次穿刺成功率分别为52.2%和47.8%。术后1小时,大多数患者放松舒适。两组术后对抢救性镇痛的需求具有可比性。与超声引导技术相比,常规技术更简单,耗时更短,超声引导技术较新,从业人员需要专业知识。两种技术提供的镇痛质量是相当的。超声引导入路的并发症发生率较低。超声检查是选择的方式,特别是在情况下,检测骶骨解剖和标志是困难的。然而,需要进一步的研究来确定超声在执行尾侧阻滞中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信