Renata Reis de Carvalho, Jonathan William Trautenmüller, S. V. Kohler, Edson Luiz Serpe, A. Corte, D. A. Silva, Afonso Figueiredo Filho
{"title":"Biomass modeling in a mixed plantation of Pinus taeda L. and Pinus elliottii Engelm","authors":"Renata Reis de Carvalho, Jonathan William Trautenmüller, S. V. Kohler, Edson Luiz Serpe, A. Corte, D. A. Silva, Afonso Figueiredo Filho","doi":"10.18671/scifor.v50.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to compare three approaches to fit models to estimate forest biomass in a mixed plantation of Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii with 16 years of age. The data came from the biomass of 60 trees sampled, 30 trees of Pinus taeda and 30 trees of Pinus elliottii. The aerial biomass was estimated through the regression analysis (independent adjustment and simultaneous adjustment) and the artificial intelligence method with the nearest neighbor techniques. The models were selected and compared based on the quality of the statistical indicators: adjusted determination coefficient (Raj), standard error of the relative estimate (Syx%), Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), Graphical analysis of residuals (%) and the ranking of the models. In the three approaches there were differences in total and component biomass estimates, being this difference associated with the heterogeneity of species (genetic variability by seminal origin), their components, and the lowest correlation of weight with diameter and height (allometric relationships). The technique of the nearest neighbor did not present satisfactory results, its use being recommended for a larger data base. Simultaneous adjustment was similar to the independent fitting method. However, the simultaneous equation has the advantage that when adding the biomass of the components, the result is compatible with the total biomass, which is more satisfactory for the estimation of total biomass.","PeriodicalId":54443,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Forestalis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Forestalis","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18671/scifor.v50.27","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare three approaches to fit models to estimate forest biomass in a mixed plantation of Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii with 16 years of age. The data came from the biomass of 60 trees sampled, 30 trees of Pinus taeda and 30 trees of Pinus elliottii. The aerial biomass was estimated through the regression analysis (independent adjustment and simultaneous adjustment) and the artificial intelligence method with the nearest neighbor techniques. The models were selected and compared based on the quality of the statistical indicators: adjusted determination coefficient (Raj), standard error of the relative estimate (Syx%), Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), Graphical analysis of residuals (%) and the ranking of the models. In the three approaches there were differences in total and component biomass estimates, being this difference associated with the heterogeneity of species (genetic variability by seminal origin), their components, and the lowest correlation of weight with diameter and height (allometric relationships). The technique of the nearest neighbor did not present satisfactory results, its use being recommended for a larger data base. Simultaneous adjustment was similar to the independent fitting method. However, the simultaneous equation has the advantage that when adding the biomass of the components, the result is compatible with the total biomass, which is more satisfactory for the estimation of total biomass.
期刊介绍:
Scientia Forestalis is a scientific publication of the IPEF – Institute of Forest Research and Studies, founded in 1968, as a nonprofit institution, in agreement with the LCF – Department of Forest Sciences of the ESALQ – Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture of the USP – São Paulo University. Scientia Forestalis, affiliated to the ABEC – Brazilian Association of Scientific Publishers, publishes four issues per year of original papers related to the several fields of the Forest Sciences.
The Editorial Board is composed by the Editor, the Scientific Editors (evaluating the manuscript), and the Associated Editors (helping on the decision of acceptation or not of the manuscript, analyzed by the Peer-Reviewers.