Prognostic significance of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Score in predicting 30-day mortality in Chittagong Medical College Hospital

Md Shawkat Emran, -. Md Hassanuzzaman, S. Majumder, Md. Rafiqul Islam, M. Kabir, Abu Bakar Muhammad Nizamul Hoque Sikder, Pijush Majumder, Syed Arif Uddin, -. Md Rubel, Md Wahidur Rahman, Mohammad AnwarulAzim Chowdhury, Md. Ashrafuzzaman Khan, Md. Humayun Kabir Sarker, A. Chowdhury
{"title":"Prognostic significance of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Score in predicting 30-day mortality in Chittagong Medical College Hospital","authors":"Md Shawkat Emran, -. Md Hassanuzzaman, S. Majumder, Md. Rafiqul Islam, M. Kabir, Abu Bakar Muhammad Nizamul Hoque Sikder, Pijush Majumder, Syed Arif Uddin, -. Md Rubel, Md Wahidur Rahman, Mohammad AnwarulAzim Chowdhury, Md. Ashrafuzzaman Khan, Md. Humayun Kabir Sarker, A. Chowdhury","doi":"10.3329/bjn.v35i1.57630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Prognosticating the outcome of Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH) at the time of admission is important to customize treatment in a cost-effective manner in such cases. ICH sore is a widely used prognosticating tool but yet not evaluated in our setting. This study was aimed to assess the prognostic factors influencing outcome and validating the ICH score for prediction of 30-day mortalityin hospitalized patients with ICH. \nMaterials and methods:This prospective observational study was conducted in Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh among 105 consecutively admitted patients aged 18 years and above with a computed tomography evidence of spontaneous ICH. ICH score was calculated soon after confirmation of diagnosis. Primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality after admission. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to assess outcome at discharge and at 30-day follow up. \nResults:A total of 104 patients were analyzed. Mean age of this cohort was 59.30±19.91 years. At 30 days all 27 patients with an ICH score of 0 survived, whereas those having scores of 1, 2, 3, and 4 had 5.9%, 33.3%, 46.2% and 88.9% mortality, respectively. ICH score was good for discriminating 30-day mortality with having an area under the ROC curve of 0.886 (95% CI:0.816-0.956; p<0.001]. For patients scoring above 2, the rate of poor functional outcome (mRS score e”4) approaches 100%. On the other hand, 18.5% of patients with score of 0 and 64.7% of patients with a score of 1 are not functionally independent after 30 days. \nConclusion:In conclusion, the present study has demonstrated that the ICH score is a strong prognostic indicator of ICH outcomes (30-day mortality and 30- day functional outcome) among hospitalized patients in Bangladesh. \nBangladesh Journal of Neuroscience 2019; Vol. 35 (2): 78-85","PeriodicalId":8727,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"133 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjn.v35i1.57630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Prognosticating the outcome of Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH) at the time of admission is important to customize treatment in a cost-effective manner in such cases. ICH sore is a widely used prognosticating tool but yet not evaluated in our setting. This study was aimed to assess the prognostic factors influencing outcome and validating the ICH score for prediction of 30-day mortalityin hospitalized patients with ICH. Materials and methods:This prospective observational study was conducted in Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh among 105 consecutively admitted patients aged 18 years and above with a computed tomography evidence of spontaneous ICH. ICH score was calculated soon after confirmation of diagnosis. Primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality after admission. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to assess outcome at discharge and at 30-day follow up. Results:A total of 104 patients were analyzed. Mean age of this cohort was 59.30±19.91 years. At 30 days all 27 patients with an ICH score of 0 survived, whereas those having scores of 1, 2, 3, and 4 had 5.9%, 33.3%, 46.2% and 88.9% mortality, respectively. ICH score was good for discriminating 30-day mortality with having an area under the ROC curve of 0.886 (95% CI:0.816-0.956; p<0.001]. For patients scoring above 2, the rate of poor functional outcome (mRS score e”4) approaches 100%. On the other hand, 18.5% of patients with score of 0 and 64.7% of patients with a score of 1 are not functionally independent after 30 days. Conclusion:In conclusion, the present study has demonstrated that the ICH score is a strong prognostic indicator of ICH outcomes (30-day mortality and 30- day functional outcome) among hospitalized patients in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience 2019; Vol. 35 (2): 78-85
吉大港医学院附属医院脑出血评分预测30天死亡率的预后意义
背景:在入院时预测脑出血(ICH)的预后对于在此类病例中以具有成本效益的方式定制治疗非常重要。脑出血是一种广泛使用的预后工具,但在我们的研究中尚未进行评估。本研究旨在评估影响预后的预后因素,并验证脑出血评分对脑出血住院患者30天死亡率的预测作用。材料和方法:本前瞻性观察性研究在孟加拉国吉大港医学院医院进行,纳入105例18岁及以上、有自发性脑出血计算机断层扫描证据的患者。确诊后立即计算ICH评分。主要结局指标为入院后30天死亡率。采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评估出院时和随访30天的预后。结果:共分析104例患者。该队列的平均年龄为59.30±19.91岁。30天时,27例ICH评分为0的患者全部存活,而评分为1、2、3和4的患者死亡率分别为5.9%、33.3%、46.2%和88.9%。ICH评分能很好地区分30天死亡率,ROC曲线下面积为0.886 (95% CI:0.816-0.956;p < 0.001)。对于评分在2分以上的患者,功能预后不良(mRS评分e”4)的比率接近100%。另一方面,18.5%的0分患者和64.7%的1分患者在30天后功能不独立。结论:总之,本研究表明,脑出血评分是孟加拉国住院患者脑出血结局(30天死亡率和30天功能结局)的一个强有力的预后指标。2019年孟加拉国神经科学杂志;Vol. 35 (2): 78-85
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信