An Evaluation of the Efficacy of Predictive Tests and Anthropometric Measurements in Determining Difficult Intubation in Children

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
L. Pirbudak
{"title":"An Evaluation of the Efficacy of Predictive Tests and Anthropometric Measurements in Determining Difficult Intubation in Children","authors":"L. Pirbudak","doi":"10.14744/etd.2023.05046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Determining risk factors prior to intubation is crucial for patient safety. This study aimed to assess the usability of the predictive tests and anthropometric measurements in identifying potential difficult intubation in children. Materials and Methods: This prospective study involved 200 pediatric patients aged 7 to 15 years who were scheduled to receive general anesthesia and were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II with no pre-existing airway issues. Patients were categorized based on age into three groups: Group 1 (7–9 years, n=69), Group 2 (10–12 years, n=65), and Group 3 (13–15 years, n=66). Modified Mallampati Classification (MMC), mandibular protrusion (MP), tooth anomalies (missing tooth, decayed tooth, protruding upper incisor, and long upper incisor), thyromental distance (TMD), sternomental distance (SMD), and atlanto-occipital joint mobility (AOJM1 and AOJM2) were determined for each patient. These prediction tests were then compared with the Cormack–Lehane (CL) classification. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of TMD, SMD, and missing tooth. The MMC exhibited the highest sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) (100% and 47%, respectively), while the MP had the highest specificity (94.5%). It was predicted that reference values of ≤ 6 cm for TMD and ≤ 12 cm for SMD would yield very low sensitivity and PPV for Group 1. Conclusion: Reference values of ≤ 5 cm for TMD and ≤ 10 cm for SMD were found to provide useful predictive information for children aged 7–9 years.","PeriodicalId":43995,"journal":{"name":"Erciyes Medical Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erciyes Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/etd.2023.05046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Determining risk factors prior to intubation is crucial for patient safety. This study aimed to assess the usability of the predictive tests and anthropometric measurements in identifying potential difficult intubation in children. Materials and Methods: This prospective study involved 200 pediatric patients aged 7 to 15 years who were scheduled to receive general anesthesia and were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II with no pre-existing airway issues. Patients were categorized based on age into three groups: Group 1 (7–9 years, n=69), Group 2 (10–12 years, n=65), and Group 3 (13–15 years, n=66). Modified Mallampati Classification (MMC), mandibular protrusion (MP), tooth anomalies (missing tooth, decayed tooth, protruding upper incisor, and long upper incisor), thyromental distance (TMD), sternomental distance (SMD), and atlanto-occipital joint mobility (AOJM1 and AOJM2) were determined for each patient. These prediction tests were then compared with the Cormack–Lehane (CL) classification. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of TMD, SMD, and missing tooth. The MMC exhibited the highest sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) (100% and 47%, respectively), while the MP had the highest specificity (94.5%). It was predicted that reference values of ≤ 6 cm for TMD and ≤ 12 cm for SMD would yield very low sensitivity and PPV for Group 1. Conclusion: Reference values of ≤ 5 cm for TMD and ≤ 10 cm for SMD were found to provide useful predictive information for children aged 7–9 years.
预测试验和人体测量测定儿童插管困难的疗效评价
目的:确定插管前的危险因素对患者安全至关重要。本研究旨在评估预测试验和人体测量在识别儿童潜在插管困难方面的可用性。材料和方法:本前瞻性研究纳入200名7至15岁的儿童患者,他们计划接受全身麻醉,并被归类为美国麻醉医师协会(ASA) I-II级,没有预先存在的气道问题。患者按年龄分为3组:1组(7 ~ 9岁,n=69), 2组(10 ~ 12岁,n=65), 3组(13 ~ 15岁,n=66)。对每位患者进行改良Mallampati分类(MMC)、下颌突出(MP)、牙齿异常(缺牙、蛀牙、上门牙突出、上门牙长)、甲状腺距离(TMD)、胸骨距离(SMD)、寰枕关节活动度(AOJM1和AOJM2)的测定。然后将这些预测测试与Cormack-Lehane (CL)分类进行比较。结果:两组间TMD、SMD、缺牙差异均有统计学意义。MMC具有最高的敏感性和阳性预测值(PPV)(分别为100%和47%),MP具有最高的特异性(94.5%)。据预测,TMD的参考值≤6 cm, SMD的参考值≤12 cm将导致组1的灵敏度和PPV非常低。结论:TMD的参考值≤5 cm, SMD的参考值≤10 cm可为7-9岁儿童提供有用的预测信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Erciyes Medical Journal
Erciyes Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Erciyes Medical Journal (Erciyes Med J) is the international, peer-reviewed, open access publication of Erciyes University School of Medicine. The journal, which has been in continuous publication since 1978, is a publication published on March, June, September, and December. The publication language of the journal is English. The journal accepts clinical and experimental research articles in different fields of medicine, original case reports, letters to the editor and invited reviews for publication. Research articles and case reports on regionally frequent and specific medical topics are prioritized. Manuscripts on national and international scientific meetings and symposiums and manuscripts sharing scientific correspondence and scientific knowledge between authors and their readers are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信