Responses of Exporters to Trade Protectionism: Inference from the U.S.-China Trade War

Lingduo Jiang, Yi Lu, Hong Song, Guofeng Zhang
{"title":"Responses of Exporters to Trade Protectionism: Inference from the U.S.-China Trade War","authors":"Lingduo Jiang, Yi Lu, Hong Song, Guofeng Zhang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3934109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates how exports respond to trade protection by studying the U.S.-China trade war in 2018. Using monthly customs data in China from January 2017 to May 2019, we find that the launch of the trade war against Chinese exports by the U.S., on average, reduces Chinese total exports to the U.S. by 8.91%. Further decomposition shows that the reduction in exports is mostly explained by a decrease in quantity, with prices relatively unchanged. Meanwhile, negative trade shocks cause export diversion to countries that are closer and have larger economies, and exports in R&D-intensive, high-skill-labor-intensive, high-labor-income-share, and upstream industries have been diverted even more. Heterogeneous analyses show that industries with comparative advantage, high export growth, large export value, and high elasticity of substitution are more responsive to trade protection.","PeriodicalId":14394,"journal":{"name":"International Political Economy: Trade Policy eJournal","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Political Economy: Trade Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3934109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This paper investigates how exports respond to trade protection by studying the U.S.-China trade war in 2018. Using monthly customs data in China from January 2017 to May 2019, we find that the launch of the trade war against Chinese exports by the U.S., on average, reduces Chinese total exports to the U.S. by 8.91%. Further decomposition shows that the reduction in exports is mostly explained by a decrease in quantity, with prices relatively unchanged. Meanwhile, negative trade shocks cause export diversion to countries that are closer and have larger economies, and exports in R&D-intensive, high-skill-labor-intensive, high-labor-income-share, and upstream industries have been diverted even more. Heterogeneous analyses show that industries with comparative advantage, high export growth, large export value, and high elasticity of substitution are more responsive to trade protection.
出口商对贸易保护主义的反应:来自中美贸易战的推论
本文以2018年中美贸易战为研究对象,探讨出口对贸易保护的反应。利用中国2017年1月至2019年5月的月度海关数据,我们发现,美国对中国出口产品发动贸易战,平均使中国对美出口总额减少8.91%。进一步分解可以看出,出口减少的主要原因是数量减少,价格相对不变。与此同时,负面贸易冲击导致出口向距离更近、经济规模更大的国家转移,研发密集型、高技能劳动密集型、高劳动收入份额和上游产业的出口转移更为严重。异质性分析表明,具有比较优势、出口增长率高、出口价值大、替代弹性高的产业对贸易保护的响应更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信