The “good” epidural: Women’s use of epidurals in relation to dominant discourses on “natural” birth

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sunna Símonardóttir, A. Rúdólfsdóttir
{"title":"The “good” epidural: Women’s use of epidurals in relation to dominant discourses on “natural” birth","authors":"Sunna Símonardóttir, A. Rúdólfsdóttir","doi":"10.1177/0959353520944808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Childbirth is widely recognized to be among the most painful of experiences, and the most common and effective pain relief for birthing women is known to be the use of epidural analgesia. The increase in the use of epidural analgesia for birthing women has been described by some critics as a by-product of the medicalized model of birth, although there remains a notable dearth of research regarding women’s experiences of epidurals. The present paper seeks to address this research gap by examining how first-time mothers in Iceland discuss their intentions concerning pain relief during birth, along with how they construct childbirth-related pain and the use of epidural analgesia in the context of a midwife-led model of care and an institutionalized preference for “natural” birth. The findings demonstrate that, despite initial intentions, most of the women end up having an epidural, and most describe their epidurals as both wonderful and immensely helpful. The dominant narrative about “natural” childbirth being preferable is not fully refuted by this. Instead, the women either align themselves with the ideology of the capable and knowing body or resist and contest this narrative by constructing their birthing bodies as open to, and in need of, assistance.","PeriodicalId":47643,"journal":{"name":"Feminism & Psychology","volume":"58 1","pages":"212 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminism & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353520944808","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Childbirth is widely recognized to be among the most painful of experiences, and the most common and effective pain relief for birthing women is known to be the use of epidural analgesia. The increase in the use of epidural analgesia for birthing women has been described by some critics as a by-product of the medicalized model of birth, although there remains a notable dearth of research regarding women’s experiences of epidurals. The present paper seeks to address this research gap by examining how first-time mothers in Iceland discuss their intentions concerning pain relief during birth, along with how they construct childbirth-related pain and the use of epidural analgesia in the context of a midwife-led model of care and an institutionalized preference for “natural” birth. The findings demonstrate that, despite initial intentions, most of the women end up having an epidural, and most describe their epidurals as both wonderful and immensely helpful. The dominant narrative about “natural” childbirth being preferable is not fully refuted by this. Instead, the women either align themselves with the ideology of the capable and knowing body or resist and contest this narrative by constructing their birthing bodies as open to, and in need of, assistance.
“好的”硬膜外:妇女使用硬膜外与“自然”分娩的主导话语有关
分娩被广泛认为是最痛苦的经历之一,对分娩妇女来说,最常见和最有效的止痛方法是使用硬膜外镇痛。一些批评人士将分娩妇女使用硬膜外镇痛的增加描述为医疗化分娩模式的副产品,尽管关于妇女硬膜外经历的研究仍然明显缺乏。本论文旨在通过研究冰岛的第一次母亲如何讨论他们在分娩期间缓解疼痛的意图,以及他们如何在助产士主导的护理模式和对“自然”分娩的制度化偏好的背景下构建与分娩相关的疼痛和硬膜外镇痛的使用,来解决这一研究差距。研究结果表明,尽管最初的意图是这样的,但大多数女性最终都进行了硬膜外麻醉,而且大多数人都将硬膜外麻醉描述为既美妙又非常有用。关于“自然”分娩更可取的主流说法并没有被完全驳斥。相反,女性要么与有能力、有知识的身体的意识形态保持一致,要么通过将她们的分娩身体构建为开放的、需要帮助的身体来抵制和挑战这种叙事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Feminism & Psychology provides a forum for debate at the interface between feminism and psychology. The journal"s principal aim is to foster the development of feminist theory and practice in – and beyond – psychology. It publishes high-quality original research, theoretical articles, and commentaries. We are interested in pieces that provide insights into the gendered reality of everyday lives, especially in relation to women and girls, as well as pieces that address broader theoretical issues. Feminism & Psychology seeks to publish work from scholars, researchers, activists and practitioners at all stages of their careers who share a feminist analysis of the overlapping domains of gender and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信