Feasibility of floating solar photovoltaic systems (FSPVs) development in Nigeria: an economic cost appraisal case study

S. O. Effiom
{"title":"Feasibility of floating solar photovoltaic systems (FSPVs) development in Nigeria: an economic cost appraisal case study","authors":"S. O. Effiom","doi":"10.31763/aet.v2i2.1012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focused on evaluating the economic cost viability of developing a floating solar photovoltaic systems (FSPVs) project in Nigeria, using Ikang river, Bakassi as an incident study. The FSPVs was designed using the HOMER software to satisfy full load requirements of 2426.45 kWh/day, while appraising the viability of the FSPVs in incident study. Meteorological data of the incident study location which include geographical coordinates, ambient temperature, and global horizontal irradiance were used to select a suitable FSPVs design for the cost appraisal. Lifecycle cost model was further developed to evaluate the proposed FSPVs at different project development phases. These include: predevelopment and consenting (PC), procurement and acquisition (PA), installation and commissioning (IC), operation and maintenance (OM), and decommissioning and disposal (DD). The results obtained showed that the net present cost, Levelized cost of energy, and operating cost of the project were 10,350,933.25USD, 0.90USD/kWh, and 179,164.73USD, respectively. Also, the capital expenditure (CAPEX) amassed by 81.53% of the entire project cost, while operating expenditure (OPEX) was 18.47%. Furthermore, installation, support systems, predevelopment and project management, contingencies, indirect cost, and electrical equipment were the key drivers of the project. For the lifecycle stages; PC, PA, IC, OM and DD were obtained to be 12%, 57.9%, 11.6%, 9.96%, and 8% respectively of the project cost. Thus, the incident study location has the potential for FSPVs development and has proven to be economically viable. Nevertheless, established model was suitable in appraising preliminary variations in FSPVs.","PeriodicalId":21010,"journal":{"name":"Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31763/aet.v2i2.1012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study focused on evaluating the economic cost viability of developing a floating solar photovoltaic systems (FSPVs) project in Nigeria, using Ikang river, Bakassi as an incident study. The FSPVs was designed using the HOMER software to satisfy full load requirements of 2426.45 kWh/day, while appraising the viability of the FSPVs in incident study. Meteorological data of the incident study location which include geographical coordinates, ambient temperature, and global horizontal irradiance were used to select a suitable FSPVs design for the cost appraisal. Lifecycle cost model was further developed to evaluate the proposed FSPVs at different project development phases. These include: predevelopment and consenting (PC), procurement and acquisition (PA), installation and commissioning (IC), operation and maintenance (OM), and decommissioning and disposal (DD). The results obtained showed that the net present cost, Levelized cost of energy, and operating cost of the project were 10,350,933.25USD, 0.90USD/kWh, and 179,164.73USD, respectively. Also, the capital expenditure (CAPEX) amassed by 81.53% of the entire project cost, while operating expenditure (OPEX) was 18.47%. Furthermore, installation, support systems, predevelopment and project management, contingencies, indirect cost, and electrical equipment were the key drivers of the project. For the lifecycle stages; PC, PA, IC, OM and DD were obtained to be 12%, 57.9%, 11.6%, 9.96%, and 8% respectively of the project cost. Thus, the incident study location has the potential for FSPVs development and has proven to be economically viable. Nevertheless, established model was suitable in appraising preliminary variations in FSPVs.
浮动太阳能光伏系统(fspv)在尼日利亚发展的可行性:经济成本评估案例研究
本研究的重点是评估在尼日利亚开发浮动太阳能光伏系统(fspv)项目的经济成本可行性,使用Bakassi的Ikang河作为事件研究。采用HOMER软件设计fspv,以满足2426.45 kWh/day的满负荷需求,同时在事故研究中评估fspv的可行性。利用事故研究地点的气象数据,包括地理坐标、环境温度和全球水平辐照度,选择合适的fspv设计进行成本评估。进一步开发了生命周期成本模型,以评估不同项目开发阶段拟议的fspv。这些步骤包括:预开发和许可(PC)、采购和采购(PA)、安装和调试(IC)、操作和维护(OM)以及退役和处置(DD)。计算结果表明,该项目净现值成本为10350,933.25美元,能源平净成本为0.90美元/千瓦时,运行成本为179,164.73美元/千瓦时。此外,资本支出(CAPEX)占整个项目成本的81.53%,而运营支出(OPEX)占18.47%。此外,安装、支持系统、预开发和项目管理、突发事件、间接成本和电气设备是项目的关键驱动因素。对于生命周期阶段;PC、PA、IC、OM、DD分别占工程造价的12%、57.9%、11.6%、9.96%、8%。因此,事故研究地点具有开发fspv的潜力,并且已被证明具有经济可行性。然而,所建立的模型适合于评价fspv的初步变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信