Focus on corona phlebectatica: Diagnostic, significance and predictive value in chronic venous disorders

Jean-François Uhl , André Cornu-Thenard , Patrick H. Carpentier , Pier Luigi Antignani
{"title":"Focus on corona phlebectatica: Diagnostic, significance and predictive value in chronic venous disorders","authors":"Jean-François Uhl ,&nbsp;André Cornu-Thenard ,&nbsp;Patrick H. Carpentier ,&nbsp;Pier Luigi Antignani","doi":"10.1016/j.rvm.2013.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Corona phlebectatica (corona) is a clinical sign associated with chronic venous disorders (CVD). It is a good predictor for skin changes indicating a decompensation of the disease. However, it is not yet included in the clinical part of the CEAP classification, mainly due to the lack of operational criteria for its positive diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To focus on the diagnostic and predictive values of corona, and to answer some relevant questions: How to define relevant operational criteria for a simple and reliable diagnosis in daily practice? Is the diagnosis reproducible? What is the value of this sign for the prognosis of CVD and their treatment?</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In order to clinically define corona, the association of blue telangiectases and stasis spots has the best specificity, and the blue telangiectases is the most sensible item. Their associated presence can be considered as a good operational criterion for the positive diagnosis of corona.</p><p>Corona has also shown to be significantly correlated with the presence of incompetent leg perforator veins.</p><p>The presence of corona also has a high value to predict the occurrence of skin changes and venous ulceration in the next few years of evolution of the disease.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Corona should no longer be considered as simple telangiectases of the foot (C1). It is a simple and reliable clinical entity, extremely relevant for the severity of the disease.</p><p>This is the reason why a careful examination of the ankle should be done in any patient with CVD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101091,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Vascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rvm.2013.07.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212021113000192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Corona phlebectatica (corona) is a clinical sign associated with chronic venous disorders (CVD). It is a good predictor for skin changes indicating a decompensation of the disease. However, it is not yet included in the clinical part of the CEAP classification, mainly due to the lack of operational criteria for its positive diagnosis.

Aim

To focus on the diagnostic and predictive values of corona, and to answer some relevant questions: How to define relevant operational criteria for a simple and reliable diagnosis in daily practice? Is the diagnosis reproducible? What is the value of this sign for the prognosis of CVD and their treatment?

Results

In order to clinically define corona, the association of blue telangiectases and stasis spots has the best specificity, and the blue telangiectases is the most sensible item. Their associated presence can be considered as a good operational criterion for the positive diagnosis of corona.

Corona has also shown to be significantly correlated with the presence of incompetent leg perforator veins.

The presence of corona also has a high value to predict the occurrence of skin changes and venous ulceration in the next few years of evolution of the disease.

Conclusion

Corona should no longer be considered as simple telangiectases of the foot (C1). It is a simple and reliable clinical entity, extremely relevant for the severity of the disease.

This is the reason why a careful examination of the ankle should be done in any patient with CVD.

关注静脉冠状病:慢性静脉疾病的诊断、意义和预测价值
背景:静脉电晕(corona)是一种与慢性静脉疾病(CVD)相关的临床症状。这是一个很好的预测皮肤变化表明疾病的代偿失调。然而,它尚未被纳入CEAP分类的临床部分,主要是由于缺乏对其阳性诊断的操作标准。目的探讨冠状病毒的诊断和预测价值,并回答一些相关问题:如何确定相关的操作标准,以便在日常实践中进行简单可靠的诊断?诊断是否可重复?该征象对心血管疾病的预后及治疗有何价值?结果在临床上诊断冠状病毒时,蓝色毛细血管扩张酶与瘀斑的关联具有最好的特异性,蓝色毛细血管扩张酶是最敏感的指标。它们的相关存在可被视为冠状病毒阳性诊断的良好操作标准。冠状动脉也显示与腿部穿支静脉功能不全显著相关。电晕的存在对预测未来几年疾病演变中皮肤变化和静脉溃疡的发生也有很高的价值。结论冠状瘤不再是单纯的足部(C1)毛细血管扩张。它是一种简单可靠的临床指标,与疾病的严重程度密切相关。这就是为什么任何心血管疾病患者都应该仔细检查踝关节的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信