Intra/inter-rater and parallel-forms reliability of the three instruments for the assessment of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion and degree of asymmetry during the weight-bearing lunge test

Cánovas-Ambit Germán, Godinez-Leal Jorge, G. José A, Baño-Alcaraz Aitor, Medina-Mirapeix Francesc, Agustín Rodrigo Martín-San
{"title":"Intra/inter-rater and parallel-forms reliability of the three instruments for the assessment of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion and degree of asymmetry during the weight-bearing lunge test","authors":"Cánovas-Ambit Germán, Godinez-Leal Jorge, G. José A, Baño-Alcaraz Aitor, Medina-Mirapeix Francesc, Agustín Rodrigo Martín-San","doi":"10.29328/journal.jnpr.1001043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study sought to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the three instruments for the measurement of ankle dorsiflexion (ADF) range of motion (ROM) and degree of asymmetry during the Weight-Bearing Lunge Test (WBLT) and to examine the agreement between them in asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects. Methods: Thirty-two healthy subjects and thirty-three subjects with pathologies were measured on two occasions by two different examiners and using different methods while performing the WBLT. Results: Intra- and inter-rater reliability of Veloflex showed good to excellent values (ICC’s > 0.88) for both the measurement of ADF-ROM and degree of asymmetry in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. In addition, Veloflex and the tape measure showed acceptable agreement between their values in symptomatic subjects. Conclusion: Veloflex is reliable for the measurement of ADF-ROM and the degree of asymmetry in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. This system may be exchanged by the tape measure, however, exchanging Veloflex with the Dorsiflex app is not recommended.","PeriodicalId":90608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of novel physiotherapy and physical rehabilitation","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of novel physiotherapy and physical rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jnpr.1001043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study sought to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the three instruments for the measurement of ankle dorsiflexion (ADF) range of motion (ROM) and degree of asymmetry during the Weight-Bearing Lunge Test (WBLT) and to examine the agreement between them in asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects. Methods: Thirty-two healthy subjects and thirty-three subjects with pathologies were measured on two occasions by two different examiners and using different methods while performing the WBLT. Results: Intra- and inter-rater reliability of Veloflex showed good to excellent values (ICC’s > 0.88) for both the measurement of ADF-ROM and degree of asymmetry in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. In addition, Veloflex and the tape measure showed acceptable agreement between their values in symptomatic subjects. Conclusion: Veloflex is reliable for the measurement of ADF-ROM and the degree of asymmetry in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. This system may be exchanged by the tape measure, however, exchanging Veloflex with the Dorsiflex app is not recommended.
负重弓步试验中评估踝关节背屈运动范围和不对称程度的三种器械的内/间及平行形式的可靠性
背景:本研究旨在评估负重弓步试验(WBLT)中用于测量踝关节背屈(ADF)、运动范围(ROM)和不对称程度的三种仪器的内部和内部可靠性,并检查它们在无症状和有症状受试者中的一致性。方法:32名健康受试者和33名病理受试者在进行WBLT时,分别由两名不同的考官和不同的方法进行两次测量。结果:在有症状和无症状的受试者中,Veloflex测量ADF-ROM和不对称程度的信度均为良好至优异值(ICC > 0.88)。此外,Veloflex和卷尺在有症状的受试者中显示出可接受的一致性。结论:Veloflex用于有症状和无症状受试者的ADF-ROM和不对称程度的测量是可靠的。该系统可以通过卷尺进行交换,但是,不建议将Veloflex与Dorsiflex应用程序交换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信