The Effect of Additional Finishing and Polishing Sequences on Hardness and Roughness of Two Different Dental Composites: An In Vitro Study

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kıvanç Dülger
{"title":"The Effect of Additional Finishing and Polishing Sequences on Hardness and Roughness of Two Different Dental Composites: An In Vitro Study","authors":"Kıvanç Dülger","doi":"10.1177/23202068221121518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of additional finishing and polishing sequences on a new structural colored (Omnichroma) and a conventional dental composite (Estelite Sigma Quick). Materials and Method: Forty disk-shaped dental composite specimens were prepared from each dental composite and assigned to four groups in terms of additional finishing polishing sequences. Group 1: Mylar strip (control). Group 2: Abrasive disks. Group 3: After abrasive disks, application of a felt brush with abrasive paste. Group 4: After abrasive disks, application of a felt brush with abrasive paste. Then, a single-bottle adhesive was applied as a surface sealer. Hardness and surface roughness were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. SEM images of one of each group were captured at 500x, 1500x, and 3500x magnifications. Two-way analysis of variance, Tukey HSD, and Shapiro–Wilk tests were used for the statistical analysis. Results: Mean hardness values differ in terms of finishing-polishing sequences (P < .001), dental composites (P < .001), and interaction of finishing-polishing sequences-dental composites (P < .001). Mean roughness values differ in terms of finishing-polishing (P = .002). The main effect of composites on roughness values was not found statistically significant (P = .990). Also, there is no difference between the mean roughness values in terms of the interactions of finishing-polishing and composites (P = .967). Conclusion: Finishing-polishing with abrasive disks and abrasive paste are important steps for these dental composites. However, the application of a single-bottle adhesive as a surface sealant on these composites decreases the hardness of the materials.","PeriodicalId":43017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"216 - 224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23202068221121518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of additional finishing and polishing sequences on a new structural colored (Omnichroma) and a conventional dental composite (Estelite Sigma Quick). Materials and Method: Forty disk-shaped dental composite specimens were prepared from each dental composite and assigned to four groups in terms of additional finishing polishing sequences. Group 1: Mylar strip (control). Group 2: Abrasive disks. Group 3: After abrasive disks, application of a felt brush with abrasive paste. Group 4: After abrasive disks, application of a felt brush with abrasive paste. Then, a single-bottle adhesive was applied as a surface sealer. Hardness and surface roughness were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. SEM images of one of each group were captured at 500x, 1500x, and 3500x magnifications. Two-way analysis of variance, Tukey HSD, and Shapiro–Wilk tests were used for the statistical analysis. Results: Mean hardness values differ in terms of finishing-polishing sequences (P < .001), dental composites (P < .001), and interaction of finishing-polishing sequences-dental composites (P < .001). Mean roughness values differ in terms of finishing-polishing (P = .002). The main effect of composites on roughness values was not found statistically significant (P = .990). Also, there is no difference between the mean roughness values in terms of the interactions of finishing-polishing and composites (P = .967). Conclusion: Finishing-polishing with abrasive disks and abrasive paste are important steps for these dental composites. However, the application of a single-bottle adhesive as a surface sealant on these composites decreases the hardness of the materials.
额外抛光和抛光顺序对两种牙体复合材料硬度和粗糙度影响的体外研究
目的:本研究的目的是评估额外的精加工和抛光序列对新型结构彩色(全彩色)和传统牙科复合材料(Estelite Sigma Quick)的影响。材料和方法:从每种牙复合材料中制备40个圆盘状牙复合材料样品,并根据额外的抛光顺序分为四组。第一组:密拉条(对照)。第二组:磨盘。第三组:研磨盘后,用毛毡刷涂上研磨膏。第4组:研磨盘后,用毛毡刷涂上研磨膏。然后,应用单瓶粘合剂作为表面密封剂。硬度和表面粗糙度分别用维氏硬度试验和轮廓仪测量。在500倍、1500倍和3500倍的放大倍率下,捕获每组各一组的SEM图像。采用双向方差分析、Tukey HSD和Shapiro-Wilk检验进行统计分析。结果:平均硬度值在抛光-抛光顺序(P < 0.001),牙科复合材料(P < 0.001)以及抛光-抛光顺序-牙科复合材料的相互作用(P < 0.001)方面存在差异。平均粗糙度值在精加工抛光方面有所不同(P = 0.002)。复合材料对粗糙度值的主要影响没有统计学意义(P = .990)。此外,就精加工-抛光和复合材料的相互作用而言,平均粗糙度值之间没有差异(P = .967)。结论:磨盘和磨料膏抛光是修复口腔复合材料的重要步骤。然而,在这些复合材料上应用单瓶粘合剂作为表面密封剂会降低材料的硬度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Oral Research
Journal of Advanced Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信