E. D. Glass, G. H. Watrous, W. T. Butz, W. Johnstone, C. W. Pierce
{"title":"IV. MILK HANDLING PRACTICES IN STORES. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DATING AND NON-DATING MARKETS","authors":"E. D. Glass, G. H. Watrous, W. T. Butz, W. Johnstone, C. W. Pierce","doi":"10.4315/0022-2747-34.1.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New York City vs. Chicago Milk was found to be significantly less available in the dating market than in the non-dating market. A higher incidence of special deliveries was noted in the dating market than in the non-dating market. Milk inventories maintained in the dating market were significantly lower than milk inventories maintained in the non-dating market. Returns due to date or code expiration were identical for the dating and non-dating markets and so few as to be of no consequence. Birmingham vs. Montgomery Milk was found to be slightly less available in the dating market than in the non-dating market but the difference was not statistically significant at accepted confidence levels. A higher incidence of special deliveries was noted in the dating market than in the non-dating market. Milk inventories maintained in the dating market were slightly lower than milk inventories maintained in the non-dating market. Camden vs. Philadelphia Milk was found to be slightly less available in the dating marke...","PeriodicalId":16561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of milk and food technology","volume":"223 1","pages":"46-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1971-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of milk and food technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4315/0022-2747-34.1.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
New York City vs. Chicago Milk was found to be significantly less available in the dating market than in the non-dating market. A higher incidence of special deliveries was noted in the dating market than in the non-dating market. Milk inventories maintained in the dating market were significantly lower than milk inventories maintained in the non-dating market. Returns due to date or code expiration were identical for the dating and non-dating markets and so few as to be of no consequence. Birmingham vs. Montgomery Milk was found to be slightly less available in the dating market than in the non-dating market but the difference was not statistically significant at accepted confidence levels. A higher incidence of special deliveries was noted in the dating market than in the non-dating market. Milk inventories maintained in the dating market were slightly lower than milk inventories maintained in the non-dating market. Camden vs. Philadelphia Milk was found to be slightly less available in the dating marke...