IV. MILK HANDLING PRACTICES IN STORES. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DATING AND NON-DATING MARKETS

E. D. Glass, G. H. Watrous, W. T. Butz, W. Johnstone, C. W. Pierce
{"title":"IV. MILK HANDLING PRACTICES IN STORES. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DATING AND NON-DATING MARKETS","authors":"E. D. Glass, G. H. Watrous, W. T. Butz, W. Johnstone, C. W. Pierce","doi":"10.4315/0022-2747-34.1.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New York City vs. Chicago Milk was found to be significantly less available in the dating market than in the non-dating market. A higher incidence of special deliveries was noted in the dating market than in the non-dating market. Milk inventories maintained in the dating market were significantly lower than milk inventories maintained in the non-dating market. Returns due to date or code expiration were identical for the dating and non-dating markets and so few as to be of no consequence. Birmingham vs. Montgomery Milk was found to be slightly less available in the dating market than in the non-dating market but the difference was not statistically significant at accepted confidence levels. A higher incidence of special deliveries was noted in the dating market than in the non-dating market. Milk inventories maintained in the dating market were slightly lower than milk inventories maintained in the non-dating market. Camden vs. Philadelphia Milk was found to be slightly less available in the dating marke...","PeriodicalId":16561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of milk and food technology","volume":"223 1","pages":"46-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1971-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of milk and food technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4315/0022-2747-34.1.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New York City vs. Chicago Milk was found to be significantly less available in the dating market than in the non-dating market. A higher incidence of special deliveries was noted in the dating market than in the non-dating market. Milk inventories maintained in the dating market were significantly lower than milk inventories maintained in the non-dating market. Returns due to date or code expiration were identical for the dating and non-dating markets and so few as to be of no consequence. Birmingham vs. Montgomery Milk was found to be slightly less available in the dating market than in the non-dating market but the difference was not statistically significant at accepted confidence levels. A higher incidence of special deliveries was noted in the dating market than in the non-dating market. Milk inventories maintained in the dating market were slightly lower than milk inventories maintained in the non-dating market. Camden vs. Philadelphia Milk was found to be slightly less available in the dating marke...
牛奶在商店中的处理方法。约会市场和非约会市场的区别
纽约和芝加哥的牛奶被发现在约会市场比在非约会市场要少得多。在约会市场中,特殊递送的发生率高于非约会市场。在测年市场维持的牛奶库存明显低于在非测年市场维持的牛奶库存。由于日期或代码到期而产生的回报对于日期和非日期市场是相同的,而且很少,因此没有什么影响。伯明翰和蒙哥马利牛奶在约会市场上的可用性比在非约会市场上的可用性略低,但在可接受的置信水平上,这种差异在统计上并不显著。在约会市场中,特殊递送的发生率高于非约会市场。定年市场维持的牛奶库存略低于非定年市场维持的牛奶库存。卡姆登诉费城牛奶案在约会市场上的可用性略低……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信