METALS IN SOIL AND AMERICAN CHESTNUT TISSUE IN EXPERIMENTAL SOIL TREATMENTS PLOTS ON A COAL MINE RECLAIMED SITE

Jenise M. Bauman, R. Brisbin, K. Gilland, Erica T. Cline
{"title":"METALS IN SOIL AND AMERICAN CHESTNUT TISSUE IN EXPERIMENTAL SOIL TREATMENTS PLOTS ON A COAL MINE RECLAIMED SITE","authors":"Jenise M. Bauman, R. Brisbin, K. Gilland, Erica T. Cline","doi":"10.21000/JASMR16020001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The Appalachian Regional Reforestation Initiative outlines planting methods that include preparation of a deep-rooting zone for healthy tree establishment (> 1.3 m deep). Continued monitoring may show that soil-ripping has pronounced effects in later years. However, little is known about the interactions of reclamation methods, buried metals, and micronutrients in soils on reclaimed coal mined sites. This study examined soil samples and plant tissue in eight-year-old pure American (Castanea dentata) and hybrid chestnuts BC1F3, and BC2F3 (C. dentata × C. mollissima) on a reclaimed coal mine site located in Dresden, Ohio under various treatments: 1) untreated control plots, 2) plots plowed and disked to 30 cm depth, 3) plots deep-ripped to 1 m depth, and 4) a combination of ripped and plowed/disked. Soil samples were collected in triplicate from all four treatments (n=3). Leaves were collected from a randomly selected subset of 108 trees (n=9). Flowers were collected from this subset (22 individuals), representing all treatments. Soil, leaves, and floral tissue were analyzed for silver (Ag), aluminum (Al), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), lead (Pb), selenium (Se), and zinc (Zn) using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. No differences were detected when metal concentrations in soil, foliage, and floral tissue were compared among soil preparation treatments and chestnut tree types. Soil concentrations of Cu, Mn, and Se were detected at higher levels than county averages. Differences were noted when metal concentrations in soil were compared to chestnut leaves and chestnut floral tissue (P < 0.05). Elements including As and Cd were detected in soils but not found in tree tissue, indicating no potential transfer into the food chain. However, Se and Cu concentrations in chestnut floral tissue were significantly higher when compared to foliage (P = 0.004 and < 0.0001), which merits monitoring focused on metal concentrations in developing chestnut seeds.","PeriodicalId":17230,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation","volume":"413 1","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21000/JASMR16020001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The Appalachian Regional Reforestation Initiative outlines planting methods that include preparation of a deep-rooting zone for healthy tree establishment (> 1.3 m deep). Continued monitoring may show that soil-ripping has pronounced effects in later years. However, little is known about the interactions of reclamation methods, buried metals, and micronutrients in soils on reclaimed coal mined sites. This study examined soil samples and plant tissue in eight-year-old pure American (Castanea dentata) and hybrid chestnuts BC1F3, and BC2F3 (C. dentata × C. mollissima) on a reclaimed coal mine site located in Dresden, Ohio under various treatments: 1) untreated control plots, 2) plots plowed and disked to 30 cm depth, 3) plots deep-ripped to 1 m depth, and 4) a combination of ripped and plowed/disked. Soil samples were collected in triplicate from all four treatments (n=3). Leaves were collected from a randomly selected subset of 108 trees (n=9). Flowers were collected from this subset (22 individuals), representing all treatments. Soil, leaves, and floral tissue were analyzed for silver (Ag), aluminum (Al), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), lead (Pb), selenium (Se), and zinc (Zn) using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. No differences were detected when metal concentrations in soil, foliage, and floral tissue were compared among soil preparation treatments and chestnut tree types. Soil concentrations of Cu, Mn, and Se were detected at higher levels than county averages. Differences were noted when metal concentrations in soil were compared to chestnut leaves and chestnut floral tissue (P < 0.05). Elements including As and Cd were detected in soils but not found in tree tissue, indicating no potential transfer into the food chain. However, Se and Cu concentrations in chestnut floral tissue were significantly higher when compared to foliage (P = 0.004 and < 0.0001), which merits monitoring focused on metal concentrations in developing chestnut seeds.
某煤矿复垦试验田土壤处理土壤和板栗组织中的金属
摘要:阿巴拉契亚地区再造林倡议概述了种植方法,包括为健康树木建立一个深生根区(> 1.3 m深)。持续的监测可能表明,土壤撕裂在以后的几年里有明显的影响。然而,人们对复垦方法、地下金属和土壤微量元素之间的相互作用知之甚少。本研究在俄亥俄州德累斯顿的一个再生煤矿场地上,对8年生的纯美洲板栗(Castanea dentata)和杂交板栗BC1F3、BC2F3 (C. dentata × C. mollissima)进行了土壤样品和植物组织的检测,并进行了不同处理:1)未经处理的对照区,2)耕深和盘深至30 cm的区,3)深至1 m的区,以及4)耙深和耕深/盘的组合。四种处理的土壤样品每三份采集(n=3)。从随机选择的108棵树(n=9)中收集叶子。花从这个子集(22个个体)中收集,代表所有处理。采用电感耦合等离子体质谱分析土壤、叶片和花组织中银(Ag)、铝(Al)、砷(As)、镉(Cd)、铜(Cu)、锰(Mn)、铅(Pb)、硒(Se)和锌(Zn)的含量。土壤、叶片和花组织中金属含量在不同土壤处理和栗树类型间无显著差异。土壤铜、锰、硒含量均高于全县平均水平。土壤中金属含量与板栗叶和板栗花组织比较差异显著(P < 0.05)。在土壤中检测到砷和镉等元素,但在树木组织中未发现,表明没有可能转移到食物链中。板栗花组织中的硒和铜含量显著高于叶片(P = 0.004和< 0.0001),值得对板栗种子发育过程中的金属含量进行监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信