{"title":"Defining and Assessing Quality in IoT Environments: A Survey","authors":"Aggeliki Sgora, P. Chatzimisios","doi":"10.3390/iot3040026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the proliferation of multimedia services, Quality of Experience (QoE) has gained a lot of attention. QoE ties together the users’ needs and expectations to multimedia application and network performance. However, in various Internet of Things (IoT) applications such as healthcare, surveillance systems, traffic monitoring, etc., human feedback can be limited or infeasible. Moreover, for immersive augmented and virtual reality, as well as other mulsemedia applications, the evaluation in terms of quality cannot only focus on the sight and hearing senses. Therefore, the traditional QoE definition and approaches for evaluating multimedia services might not be suitable for the IoT paradigm, and more quality metrics are required in order to evaluate the quality in IoT. In this paper, we review existing quality definitions, quality influence factors (IFs) and assessment approaches for IoT. This paper also introduces challenges in the area of quality assessment for the IoT paradigm.","PeriodicalId":6745,"journal":{"name":"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)","volume":"139 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/iot3040026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
With the proliferation of multimedia services, Quality of Experience (QoE) has gained a lot of attention. QoE ties together the users’ needs and expectations to multimedia application and network performance. However, in various Internet of Things (IoT) applications such as healthcare, surveillance systems, traffic monitoring, etc., human feedback can be limited or infeasible. Moreover, for immersive augmented and virtual reality, as well as other mulsemedia applications, the evaluation in terms of quality cannot only focus on the sight and hearing senses. Therefore, the traditional QoE definition and approaches for evaluating multimedia services might not be suitable for the IoT paradigm, and more quality metrics are required in order to evaluate the quality in IoT. In this paper, we review existing quality definitions, quality influence factors (IFs) and assessment approaches for IoT. This paper also introduces challenges in the area of quality assessment for the IoT paradigm.
随着多媒体业务的蓬勃发展,体验质量(Quality of Experience, QoE)受到了广泛的关注。QoE将用户的需求和期望与多媒体应用程序和网络性能联系在一起。然而,在各种物联网(IoT)应用中,如医疗保健、监控系统、交通监控等,人工反馈可能是有限的或不可行的。此外,对于沉浸式增强现实和虚拟现实以及其他多媒体应用,质量的评价不能只关注视觉和听觉。因此,传统的QoE定义和评估多媒体服务的方法可能不适合物联网范式,需要更多的质量指标来评估物联网中的质量。在本文中,我们回顾了现有的物联网质量定义、质量影响因素(if)和评估方法。本文还介绍了物联网范式质量评估领域的挑战。