QUALITY IMPROVEMENT OF CAMEL MEAT BURGER FORMULATED WITH FAT REPLACERS DURING FROZEN STORAGE

M. Shehata, N. Salama, S. Helmy, A. Mohamed
{"title":"QUALITY IMPROVEMENT OF CAMEL MEAT BURGER FORMULATED WITH FAT REPLACERS DURING FROZEN STORAGE","authors":"M. Shehata, N. Salama, S. Helmy, A. Mohamed","doi":"10.21608/ejnf.2022.236558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY he objective of this study was to improve the quality of camel meat burger by replacing camel meat fat with two levels (5 and 10%) of barley grains and wheat bran as fat replacers. The obtained results of fat-replaced treatments scored higher content of moisture, crude protein, total ash, crude fibres and lower content of fat, compared with those of control sample. Also, the total energy value was 254.49/100g kcal for fresh, while low-fat levels of treated samples were 175.10 (10% fat) and 207.43 kcal/100g (15 % fat) before cooking, respectively. The pH values of all treatments were significant higher (P≥0.05) than those of control one. Meanwhile, Thiobarbituric acid values (TBA) of the treated burger samples were significantly lower (P≥0.05) than those of control sample. Furthermore, the impact of storage on the quality attributes of the camel meat burger was as per the following: slight decrease in pH values was noticed in all treatments, an increase in TBA values in all treatments. Water holding capacity (WHC) of the treatments with fat-replacers which was significantly higher (P≥0.05) than the control counterpart decreased during frozen storage for all treatments. Cooking loss and shrinkage percentage of fat-replacer treatments were significantly lower than those of control and by progressive frozen-storage period, noticed an increase in both of cooking loss and shrinkage, meanwhile, the cooking yield was decreased. The total bacterial count as well as psychrophilic count was significantly higher in fat–replaced treatments than those of control one. The number of bacterial count increased with decreasing the fat level for 45 days of storage periods then number of bacterial count decreased until the end of frozen storage. Concerning the sensory evaluation, the overall acceptability was higher due to fat-replaced samples. It could be concluded that using wheat bran and barley grains for producing camel meat burger led to an improvement in quality characteristics and an improvement in the overall acceptability of the treatments. The best treatment was camel burger which prepared with 10% barley grain + 10% fat content.","PeriodicalId":11538,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejnf.2022.236558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SUMMARY he objective of this study was to improve the quality of camel meat burger by replacing camel meat fat with two levels (5 and 10%) of barley grains and wheat bran as fat replacers. The obtained results of fat-replaced treatments scored higher content of moisture, crude protein, total ash, crude fibres and lower content of fat, compared with those of control sample. Also, the total energy value was 254.49/100g kcal for fresh, while low-fat levels of treated samples were 175.10 (10% fat) and 207.43 kcal/100g (15 % fat) before cooking, respectively. The pH values of all treatments were significant higher (P≥0.05) than those of control one. Meanwhile, Thiobarbituric acid values (TBA) of the treated burger samples were significantly lower (P≥0.05) than those of control sample. Furthermore, the impact of storage on the quality attributes of the camel meat burger was as per the following: slight decrease in pH values was noticed in all treatments, an increase in TBA values in all treatments. Water holding capacity (WHC) of the treatments with fat-replacers which was significantly higher (P≥0.05) than the control counterpart decreased during frozen storage for all treatments. Cooking loss and shrinkage percentage of fat-replacer treatments were significantly lower than those of control and by progressive frozen-storage period, noticed an increase in both of cooking loss and shrinkage, meanwhile, the cooking yield was decreased. The total bacterial count as well as psychrophilic count was significantly higher in fat–replaced treatments than those of control one. The number of bacterial count increased with decreasing the fat level for 45 days of storage periods then number of bacterial count decreased until the end of frozen storage. Concerning the sensory evaluation, the overall acceptability was higher due to fat-replaced samples. It could be concluded that using wheat bran and barley grains for producing camel meat burger led to an improvement in quality characteristics and an improvement in the overall acceptability of the treatments. The best treatment was camel burger which prepared with 10% barley grain + 10% fat content.
添加脂肪替代物对驼肉汉堡冷冻贮藏质量的改善
本研究的目的是通过用两种水平(5%和10%)的大麦和麦麸代替骆驼肉脂肪来改善骆驼肉汉堡的质量。与对照样品相比,脂肪替代处理的水分、粗蛋白质、总灰分、粗纤维含量较高,脂肪含量较低。此外,新鲜样品的总能量值为254.49/100g kcal,而烹调前处理样品的低脂水平分别为175.10(10%脂肪)和207.43 kcal/100g(15%脂肪)。各处理的pH值均显著高于对照组(P≥0.05)。处理后的汉堡样品的硫代巴比妥酸值(TBA)显著低于对照组(P≥0.05)。此外,贮藏对驼肉汉堡品质属性的影响如下:各处理的pH值均略有下降,TBA值均有所增加。脂肪代用品处理的保水能力(WHC)显著高于对照组(P≥0.05),但各处理的保水能力在冷冻贮藏期间均呈下降趋势。脂肪替代品处理的蒸煮损失率和收缩率显著低于对照组,随着冷冻储藏时间的延长,蒸煮损失率和收缩率均有所增加,蒸煮产量有所下降。与对照组相比,脂肪替代治疗组的细菌总数和嗜冷细菌数量显著增加。45 d内细菌计数随脂肪含量的降低而升高,贮藏结束后细菌计数逐渐下降。在感官评价方面,由于脂肪替代样品,总体可接受性更高。综上所述,使用麦麸和大麦颗粒制作驼肉汉堡,改善了驼肉汉堡的品质特性,提高了处理的整体可接受性。以添加10%大麦颗粒+ 10%脂肪的骆驼汉堡处理效果最佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信