Assessing the Social Values of Built Heritage: Participatory Methods as Ways of Knowing

E. Robson
{"title":"Assessing the Social Values of Built Heritage: Participatory Methods as Ways of Knowing","authors":"E. Robson","doi":"10.3390/architecture3030023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the role participatory methods play in understanding the social values of built heritage, including people’s sense of identity, belonging, and place. It is based on research in Scotland where, as in many other countries, there is an increasing emphasis on contemporary significance and public participation within domestic heritage management frameworks. The paper draws on the experiences and findings of a social values assessment for Cables Wynd House, a Brutalist block of flats in Edinburgh that was listed in 2017. Through the case study assessment, conducted over six months in 2019, Cables Wynd House is manifested as a multiplicity of connected realities, diverse experiences, and micro-locations. The participatory methods reveal interactions and tensions between the architectural design and aesthetics of the building and participants’ lived experiences and connections. The article argues that the mix of participatory methods provide different opportunities and ways of knowing, surfacing diversity, dissonance, and complexity. It highlights that participatory research is a collaborative process, requiring a flexible and responsive approach to methods. The paper concludes that participatory methods and collaborative approaches can provide nuanced and contextualised understandings of the social value of built heritage, which can complement but also diverge significantly from professional assessments of value. Wider adoption of these methods and the resulting understandings into the management and conservation of built heritage would support more people-centred, inclusive, and socially relevant forms of practice.","PeriodicalId":79561,"journal":{"name":"Architecture (Washington, D.C.)","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture3030023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the role participatory methods play in understanding the social values of built heritage, including people’s sense of identity, belonging, and place. It is based on research in Scotland where, as in many other countries, there is an increasing emphasis on contemporary significance and public participation within domestic heritage management frameworks. The paper draws on the experiences and findings of a social values assessment for Cables Wynd House, a Brutalist block of flats in Edinburgh that was listed in 2017. Through the case study assessment, conducted over six months in 2019, Cables Wynd House is manifested as a multiplicity of connected realities, diverse experiences, and micro-locations. The participatory methods reveal interactions and tensions between the architectural design and aesthetics of the building and participants’ lived experiences and connections. The article argues that the mix of participatory methods provide different opportunities and ways of knowing, surfacing diversity, dissonance, and complexity. It highlights that participatory research is a collaborative process, requiring a flexible and responsive approach to methods. The paper concludes that participatory methods and collaborative approaches can provide nuanced and contextualised understandings of the social value of built heritage, which can complement but also diverge significantly from professional assessments of value. Wider adoption of these methods and the resulting understandings into the management and conservation of built heritage would support more people-centred, inclusive, and socially relevant forms of practice.
建筑遗产的社会价值评估:参与式方法作为认识的途径
本文探讨了参与式方法在理解建筑遗产的社会价值方面所起的作用,包括人们的认同感、归属感和地方感。它以苏格兰的研究为基础,与许多其他国家一样,在国内遗产管理框架中,越来越强调当代意义和公众参与。本文借鉴了对2017年上市的爱丁堡野兽派公寓楼cable Wynd House进行社会价值评估的经验和发现。通过在2019年进行的为期六个月的案例研究评估,cable Wynd House被表现为连接现实的多样性、不同的体验和微位置。参与式方法揭示了建筑设计和建筑美学与参与者的生活经验和联系之间的相互作用和紧张关系。本文认为,参与方法的混合提供了不同的机会和方式来了解、揭示多样性、不和谐和复杂性。它强调参与性研究是一个协作过程,需要对方法采取灵活和反应迅速的办法。本文的结论是,参与式方法和协作方法可以提供对建筑遗产社会价值的细致入微和情境化理解,这可以补充但也明显偏离专业价值评估。更广泛地采用这些方法,以及由此产生的对建筑遗产管理和保护的理解,将支持更多以人为本、包容和与社会相关的实践形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信