Cascades Across Networks Are Sufficient for the Formation of Echo Chambers: An Agent-Based Model

Jan-Philipp Fränken, Toby D. Pilditch
{"title":"Cascades Across Networks Are Sufficient for the Formation of Echo Chambers: An Agent-Based Model","authors":"Jan-Philipp Fränken, Toby D. Pilditch","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/8rgkc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investigating how echo chambers emerge in social networks is increasingly crucial, given their role in facilitating the retention of misinformation, inducing intolerance towards opposing views, and misleading public and political discourse (e.g., disbelief in climate change). Previously, the emergence of echo chambers has been attributed to psychological biases and inter-individual differences, requiring repeated interactions among network-users. In the present work we show that two core components of social networks—users self-select their networks, and information is shared laterally (i.e. peer-to-peer)—are causally sufficient to produce echo chambers. Crucially, we show that this requires neither special psychological explanation (e.g., bias or individual differences), nor repeated interactions—though these may be exacerbating factors. In fact, this effect is made increasingly worse the more generations of peer-to-peer transmissions it takes for information to permeate a network. This raises important questions for social network architects, if truly opposed to the increasing prevalence of deleterious societal trends that stem from echo chamber formation.","PeriodicalId":14675,"journal":{"name":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8rgkc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Investigating how echo chambers emerge in social networks is increasingly crucial, given their role in facilitating the retention of misinformation, inducing intolerance towards opposing views, and misleading public and political discourse (e.g., disbelief in climate change). Previously, the emergence of echo chambers has been attributed to psychological biases and inter-individual differences, requiring repeated interactions among network-users. In the present work we show that two core components of social networks—users self-select their networks, and information is shared laterally (i.e. peer-to-peer)—are causally sufficient to produce echo chambers. Crucially, we show that this requires neither special psychological explanation (e.g., bias or individual differences), nor repeated interactions—though these may be exacerbating factors. In fact, this effect is made increasingly worse the more generations of peer-to-peer transmissions it takes for information to permeate a network. This raises important questions for social network architects, if truly opposed to the increasing prevalence of deleterious societal trends that stem from echo chamber formation.
跨网络的级联足以形成回声室:一个基于代理的模型
考虑到回音室在促进错误信息的保留、诱导对对立观点的不容忍以及误导公众和政治话语(例如,不相信气候变化)方面的作用,调查回音室如何在社交网络中出现变得越来越重要。以前,回声室的出现被归因于心理偏见和个体间差异,这需要网络用户之间的反复互动。在目前的工作中,我们表明社会网络的两个核心组成部分——用户自我选择他们的网络,以及信息横向共享(即点对点)——是足以产生回音室的因果关系。至关重要的是,我们表明这既不需要特殊的心理学解释(例如,偏见或个体差异),也不需要重复的相互作用——尽管这些可能是加剧因素。事实上,信息在网络中传播所需要的点对点传输次数越多,这种影响就越严重。这对社会网络架构师提出了重要的问题,如果真的反对由回音室形成的有害社会趋势的日益流行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信