The Physiology and Mythology of the "Domestic" and the "Alien": The Model of the Vampire in Serbian Traditional Culture and Popular Culture

IF 0.3 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY
B. Žikić
{"title":"The Physiology and Mythology of the \"Domestic\" and the \"Alien\": The Model of the Vampire in Serbian Traditional Culture and Popular Culture","authors":"B. Žikić","doi":"10.21301/EAP.V16I1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The vampire in Serbian traditional culture and the vampire in popular culture are two different beings. The former is virtually identical to people in his community, does not undergo a change of character after death, and getting rid of him is the task of the whole community. He is linked to his socio-cultural environment and his existence is not linked to physiological needs and possibilities, but is circumscribed by the ability of the living members of his community to oppose him. The latter is a distinct being with supernatural abilities, whose character changes after death in the sense that he becomes a predator, a physical and ontological threat to man, and can be opposed by those who know his characteristics and weaknesses. He is not territorially restricted in his actions, but from the author's point of view he is always depicted as an interloper. He is a simulation of man insofar as he has to sustain himself in the afterlife by feeding himself, and has the ability to reproduce, i.e. to produce new beings of his kind. They have the following in common: 1) they continue to exist after death in their own physical body; 2) they are representations of the revived dead body of a concrete person, whose behavior has in the case of both models been altered precisely to the extent that this alteration can be ascribed to the notion of physical existence after death. The given malevolence, as the fundamental characteristic of the vampire's relationship to people, in both cases stems more from the meaning of the existence of these models than from a concept of an afterlife, that is, from the need to resolve the internal problems of the traditional community conceived as the local environment, and the need for self-determination towards that which is different, alien and foreign in societies of the new type, based on transcending socio-cultural locality and establishing global cultural communication.","PeriodicalId":43531,"journal":{"name":"Etnoantropoloski Problemi-Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etnoantropoloski Problemi-Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21301/EAP.V16I1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The vampire in Serbian traditional culture and the vampire in popular culture are two different beings. The former is virtually identical to people in his community, does not undergo a change of character after death, and getting rid of him is the task of the whole community. He is linked to his socio-cultural environment and his existence is not linked to physiological needs and possibilities, but is circumscribed by the ability of the living members of his community to oppose him. The latter is a distinct being with supernatural abilities, whose character changes after death in the sense that he becomes a predator, a physical and ontological threat to man, and can be opposed by those who know his characteristics and weaknesses. He is not territorially restricted in his actions, but from the author's point of view he is always depicted as an interloper. He is a simulation of man insofar as he has to sustain himself in the afterlife by feeding himself, and has the ability to reproduce, i.e. to produce new beings of his kind. They have the following in common: 1) they continue to exist after death in their own physical body; 2) they are representations of the revived dead body of a concrete person, whose behavior has in the case of both models been altered precisely to the extent that this alteration can be ascribed to the notion of physical existence after death. The given malevolence, as the fundamental characteristic of the vampire's relationship to people, in both cases stems more from the meaning of the existence of these models than from a concept of an afterlife, that is, from the need to resolve the internal problems of the traditional community conceived as the local environment, and the need for self-determination towards that which is different, alien and foreign in societies of the new type, based on transcending socio-cultural locality and establishing global cultural communication.
“国内”与“外来”的生理与神话:塞尔维亚传统文化与大众文化中的吸血鬼模式
塞尔维亚传统文化中的吸血鬼与流行文化中的吸血鬼是两种不同的存在。前者与他所在社区的人几乎完全相同,死后不会发生性格变化,摆脱他是整个社区的任务。他与他的社会文化环境相联系,他的存在与生理需求和可能性无关,而是受到他的社区中活着的成员反对他的能力的限制。后者是一个具有超自然能力的独特存在,他的性格在死后发生了变化,他成为了一个捕食者,对人类的身体和本体论的威胁,并且可以被那些知道他的特点和弱点的人反对。他的行为不受地域限制,但从作者的角度来看,他总是被描绘成一个闯入者。他是人类的模拟,因为他必须通过喂养自己来维持自己的来世,并且有繁殖的能力,即产生新的同类。他们有以下共同点:1)他们死后在自己的肉体中继续存在;2)它们是一个具体的人的复活的尸体的表征,在这两种模型的情况下,他的行为已经精确地改变了,这种改变可以归因于死后肉体存在的概念。在这两种情况下,作为吸血鬼与人类关系的基本特征的给定的恶意,更多地源于这些模式存在的意义,而不是源于来世的概念,也就是说,源于解决作为当地环境的传统社区内部问题的需要,以及对新类型社会中不同的、陌生的和外来的东西的自决需要。基于超越社会文化地域性,建立全球文化交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信