Risk and preventing perinatal HIV transmission: uncovering the social organisation of prenatal care for women living with HIV in Ontario, Canada

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
A. Ion, S. Greene, C. Sinding, D. Grace
{"title":"Risk and preventing perinatal HIV transmission: uncovering the social organisation of prenatal care for women living with HIV in Ontario, Canada","authors":"A. Ion, S. Greene, C. Sinding, D. Grace","doi":"10.1080/13698575.2020.1760217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an institutional ethnography that explored how risk discourse organised the experiences of pregnant women living with HIV and was reproduced in the work of healthcare providers operating in a ‘high risk’ prenatal clinic in Ontario, Canada. This inquiry began from the standpoint of pregnant women living with HIV, and made connections between women’s experiences, the work of healthcare providers delivering prenatal care, and the ruling relations that organised women’s experiences and healthcare providers’ activities. The study revealed how risk was an omnipresent discourse in women’s lives and became visible through the treatments women were prescribed, the prenatal clinic appointment schedule women were expected to follow, and the application of medical interventions. The discourse of risk coordinated the work of healthcare providers and was inextricably linked to practices that prioritised foetal health. Women’s daily realities and experiences were overshadowed by the healthcare providers’ focus on the foetus and mitigating perinatal risks. As a result, the work women did to organise their lives to participate in care, and the physical and emotional costs they experienced when attending their appointments, taking their medicines, and following clinical procedures were overshadowed within an institutional context where the primary goal was to reduce risks to their babies – even if women shared concerns and aspirations about preventing perinatal HIV transmission. Women’s experiences reveal some important consequences regarding the current organisation of prenatal care that emphasises risk and possible ways to enhance prenatal care policies and practices.","PeriodicalId":47341,"journal":{"name":"Health Risk & Society","volume":"478 1","pages":"136 - 155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Risk & Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2020.1760217","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper presents an institutional ethnography that explored how risk discourse organised the experiences of pregnant women living with HIV and was reproduced in the work of healthcare providers operating in a ‘high risk’ prenatal clinic in Ontario, Canada. This inquiry began from the standpoint of pregnant women living with HIV, and made connections between women’s experiences, the work of healthcare providers delivering prenatal care, and the ruling relations that organised women’s experiences and healthcare providers’ activities. The study revealed how risk was an omnipresent discourse in women’s lives and became visible through the treatments women were prescribed, the prenatal clinic appointment schedule women were expected to follow, and the application of medical interventions. The discourse of risk coordinated the work of healthcare providers and was inextricably linked to practices that prioritised foetal health. Women’s daily realities and experiences were overshadowed by the healthcare providers’ focus on the foetus and mitigating perinatal risks. As a result, the work women did to organise their lives to participate in care, and the physical and emotional costs they experienced when attending their appointments, taking their medicines, and following clinical procedures were overshadowed within an institutional context where the primary goal was to reduce risks to their babies – even if women shared concerns and aspirations about preventing perinatal HIV transmission. Women’s experiences reveal some important consequences regarding the current organisation of prenatal care that emphasises risk and possible ways to enhance prenatal care policies and practices.
风险和预防围产期艾滋病毒传播:揭示加拿大安大略省感染艾滋病毒妇女产前护理的社会组织
本文提出了一种制度人种学,探讨了风险话语如何组织感染艾滋病毒的孕妇的经历,并在加拿大安大略省一家“高风险”产前诊所的医疗服务提供者的工作中再现。这项调查从感染艾滋病毒的孕妇的角度出发,在妇女的经历、提供产前护理的保健提供者的工作以及组织妇女经历和保健提供者活动的主要关系之间建立了联系。这项研究揭示了风险是如何在妇女生活中无处不在的话语,并通过为妇女开出的治疗处方、妇女应遵守的产前诊所预约时间表以及医疗干预措施的应用而变得明显。风险论述协调了保健提供者的工作,并与优先考虑胎儿健康的做法密不可分。妇女的日常现实和经历被医疗保健提供者对胎儿和减轻围产期风险的关注所掩盖。因此,妇女为组织自己的生活参与护理所做的工作,以及她们在赴约、服药和遵循临床程序时所经历的身体和情感成本,在以减少婴儿风险为主要目标的体制背景下被掩盖了——即使妇女对预防围产期艾滋病毒传播有共同的担忧和愿望。妇女的经历揭示了当前产前护理组织的一些重要后果,这些组织强调风险和加强产前护理政策和做法的可能方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Health Risk & Society is an international scholarly journal devoted to a theoretical and empirical understanding of the social processes which influence the ways in which health risks are taken, communicated, assessed and managed. Public awareness of risk is associated with the development of high profile media debates about specific risks. Although risk issues arise in a variety of areas, such as technological usage and the environment, they are particularly evident in health. Not only is health a major issue of personal and collective concern, but failure to effectively assess and manage risk is likely to result in health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信