Dental patch test results and clinical relevance: 10 years of retrospective experience

IF 0.1 Q4 DERMATOLOGY
Oğuz Yılmaz, A. Bilgic, S. Uzun
{"title":"Dental patch test results and clinical relevance: 10 years of retrospective experience","authors":"Oğuz Yılmaz, A. Bilgic, S. Uzun","doi":"10.4103/tjd.tjd_76_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patch testing with dental screening series [dental patch test (DPT)] is used to detect triggers for mucositis and/or oral lichen planus as well as to detect contact sensitization due to substances and restorative materials used mostly in dentistry. Aim: We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the DPT results performed in our clinic in the last 10 years and to assess their clinical relevance. Methods: Data of 127 patients who had DPT in our allergy unit between January 2010 and July 2020 were included in our study. In our clinic, DPTs were applied to patients mostly when they have history of metal allergies, oral lichen planus especially close to dental materials, chronic mucositis, and history of allergy after dental procedures. The forms routinely used in our allergy unit were examined retrospectively. Results: The most common five allergens were nickel (II) sulfate hexahydrate (29.9%), palladium chloride (18.9%), sodium tetrachloropalladate (II) hydrate (18.9%), gold (I) sodium thiosulfate dihydrate (12.6%), and mercury (10.2%). Fifty-eight of 71 patients with positive PT had a current relevance according to the COADEX coding system (P < 0.05). Of the 38 individuals with nickel sensitization, 36 were females and 2 were males, and this result was statistically significant (P = 0.034). Conclusion: Nickel, palladium, sodium tetrachloropalladate, gold, and mercury, which are frequently found in dental prosthesis and materials, were the most common allergens in our study and this is in accordance with the literature.","PeriodicalId":42454,"journal":{"name":"Turk Dermatoloji Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Dermatology","volume":"178 1","pages":"90 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Dermatoloji Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjd.tjd_76_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patch testing with dental screening series [dental patch test (DPT)] is used to detect triggers for mucositis and/or oral lichen planus as well as to detect contact sensitization due to substances and restorative materials used mostly in dentistry. Aim: We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the DPT results performed in our clinic in the last 10 years and to assess their clinical relevance. Methods: Data of 127 patients who had DPT in our allergy unit between January 2010 and July 2020 were included in our study. In our clinic, DPTs were applied to patients mostly when they have history of metal allergies, oral lichen planus especially close to dental materials, chronic mucositis, and history of allergy after dental procedures. The forms routinely used in our allergy unit were examined retrospectively. Results: The most common five allergens were nickel (II) sulfate hexahydrate (29.9%), palladium chloride (18.9%), sodium tetrachloropalladate (II) hydrate (18.9%), gold (I) sodium thiosulfate dihydrate (12.6%), and mercury (10.2%). Fifty-eight of 71 patients with positive PT had a current relevance according to the COADEX coding system (P < 0.05). Of the 38 individuals with nickel sensitization, 36 were females and 2 were males, and this result was statistically significant (P = 0.034). Conclusion: Nickel, palladium, sodium tetrachloropalladate, gold, and mercury, which are frequently found in dental prosthesis and materials, were the most common allergens in our study and this is in accordance with the literature.
牙贴片试验结果与临床相关性:10年回顾性经验
背景:牙斑试验与牙科筛查系列[牙斑试验(DPT)]用于检测粘膜炎和/或口腔扁平苔藓的触发因素,以及检测牙科中主要使用的物质和修复材料引起的接触致敏。目的:我们的目的是回顾性评估过去10年在我们诊所进行的DPT结果,并评估其临床相关性。方法:我们的研究纳入了2010年1月至2020年7月在我们的过敏科接受DPT治疗的127例患者的数据。在我们的临床中,DPTs主要应用于有金属过敏史、口腔扁平苔藓特别靠近牙材料、慢性粘膜炎和牙科手术后过敏史的患者。我们对过敏科常规使用的表格进行回顾性检查。结果:五种过敏原中最常见的是六水硫酸镍(II)(29.9%)、氯化钯(18.9%)、水合四氯丙酸钠(II)(18.9%)、金(I)二水硫代硫酸钠(12.6%)和汞(10.2%)。根据COADEX编码系统,71例PT阳性患者中有58例具有当前相关性(P < 0.05)。38例镍致敏个体中,女性36例,男性2例,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.034)。结论:镍、钯、四氯氰酸钠、金、汞是我们研究中最常见的过敏原,这些过敏原常见于口腔修复体和材料中,这与文献一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信