J. Yamamuro, P. Lade
{"title":"Experiments and modelling of silty sands susceptible to static liquefaction","authors":"J. Yamamuro, P. Lade","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199911)4:6<545::AID-CFM73>3.0.CO;2-O","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most historic cases of liquefaction have been found to occur in alluvial (water) deposited silty sands. Currently, the effect of non-plastic fines (particles smaller than No. 200 sieve) on the liquefaction behaviour of sands is viewed to be either negligible or its presence actually inhibits liquefaction. Undrained triaxial compression test results performed on silty sands clearly indicate a direct correlation between the quantity of finer, non-plastic constituents and the liquefaction potential of granular soils. Increasing the fines content increases the liquefaction potential, even though the density increases. Complete static liquefaction occurs at low confining pressures. As confining pressures increase, the liquefaction potential decreases resulting in increased stability. Thus, silty sands exhibit a ‘reverse’ pattern of soil behaviour with confining pressure. Drained tests indicate both a large contractive volume change and a suppressed friction angle at low confining pressures, and this explains the undrained behaviour. It is hypothesized that the mechanism underlying this behaviour is related to the formation of a particle structure between the large and small grains which creates a highly compressible soil fabric. This ‘reverse’ behaviour pattern makes predictions of static liquefaction of silty sands difficult. However, simple modifications to the Single Hardening Model yield surface formulation enables predictions of this behaviour pattern. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":100899,"journal":{"name":"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials","volume":"70 1","pages":"545-564"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199911)4:6<545::AID-CFM73>3.0.CO;2-O","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45
易受静态液化影响的粉质砂的实验和模型
历史上发现的大多数液化案例都发生在冲积(水)沉积的粉质砂中。目前,非塑性颗粒(小于200号筛的颗粒)对砂的液化行为的影响被认为是可以忽略不计的,或者它的存在实际上抑制了液化。在粉质砂土上进行的不排水三轴压缩试验结果清楚地表明,颗粒土的非塑性成分的数量与液化潜力之间存在直接关联。增加细粒含量增加液化潜力,即使密度增加。完全静态液化发生在低围压下。随着围压的增加,液化潜力降低,稳定性增加。因此,粉质砂在围压下表现出一种“相反”的土壤行为模式。排水试验表明,在低围压下,压缩体积变化很大,摩擦角受到抑制,这解释了不排水的行为。据推测,这种行为背后的机制与大颗粒和小颗粒之间形成的颗粒结构有关,这种结构产生了高度可压缩的土壤结构。这种“反向”的行为模式使得预测粉质砂的静态液化变得困难。然而,对单一硬化模型屈服面公式的简单修改可以预测这种行为模式。版权所有©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。