Universally optimal privacy mechanisms for minimax agents

Mangesh Gupte, Mukund Sundararajan
{"title":"Universally optimal privacy mechanisms for minimax agents","authors":"Mangesh Gupte, Mukund Sundararajan","doi":"10.1145/1807085.1807105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A scheme that publishes aggregate information about sensitive data must resolve the trade-off between utility to information consumers and privacy of the database participants. Differential privacy [5] is a well-established definition of privacy--this is a universal guarantee against all attackers, whatever their side-information or intent. Can we have a similar universal guarantee for utility?\n There are two standard models of utility considered in decision theory: Bayesian and minimax [13]. Ghosh et. al. [8] show that a certain \"geometric mechanism\" gives optimal utility to all Bayesian information consumers. In this paper, we prove a similar result for minimax information consumers. Our result also works for a wider class of information consumers which includes Bayesian information consumers and subsumes the result from [8].\n We model information consumers as minimax (risk-averse) agents, each endowed with a loss-function which models their tolerance to inaccuracies and each possessing some side-information about the query. Further, information consumers are rational in the sense that they actively combine information from the mechanism with their side-information in a way that minimizes their loss. Under this assumption of rational behavior, we show that for every fixed count query, the geometric mechanism is universally optimal for all minimax information consumers.\n Additionally, our solution makes it possible to release query results, when information consumers are at different levels of privacy, in a collusion-resistant manner.","PeriodicalId":92118,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems. ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems","volume":"237 1","pages":"135-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"78","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems. ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1807085.1807105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 78

Abstract

A scheme that publishes aggregate information about sensitive data must resolve the trade-off between utility to information consumers and privacy of the database participants. Differential privacy [5] is a well-established definition of privacy--this is a universal guarantee against all attackers, whatever their side-information or intent. Can we have a similar universal guarantee for utility? There are two standard models of utility considered in decision theory: Bayesian and minimax [13]. Ghosh et. al. [8] show that a certain "geometric mechanism" gives optimal utility to all Bayesian information consumers. In this paper, we prove a similar result for minimax information consumers. Our result also works for a wider class of information consumers which includes Bayesian information consumers and subsumes the result from [8]. We model information consumers as minimax (risk-averse) agents, each endowed with a loss-function which models their tolerance to inaccuracies and each possessing some side-information about the query. Further, information consumers are rational in the sense that they actively combine information from the mechanism with their side-information in a way that minimizes their loss. Under this assumption of rational behavior, we show that for every fixed count query, the geometric mechanism is universally optimal for all minimax information consumers. Additionally, our solution makes it possible to release query results, when information consumers are at different levels of privacy, in a collusion-resistant manner.
极大极小代理的普遍最优隐私机制
发布关于敏感数据的聚合信息的方案必须解决信息消费者的效用和数据库参与者的隐私之间的权衡。差异隐私[5]是一个完善的隐私定义——这是对所有攻击者的普遍保证,无论他们的侧面信息或意图如何。我们能否有类似的公用事业的普遍保证?决策理论中有两种标准的效用模型:贝叶斯模型和极大极小模型[13]。Ghosh等人[8]表明,某种“几何机制”使所有贝叶斯信息消费者的效用最优。在本文中,我们证明了对于极小极大信息消费者的一个类似结果。我们的结果也适用于更广泛的信息消费者类别,其中包括贝叶斯信息消费者,并包含[8]的结果。我们将信息消费者建模为极大极小(风险规避)代理,每个代理都被赋予一个损失函数,用来模拟它们对不准确的容忍度,并且每个代理都拥有一些关于查询的侧信息。此外,信息消费者是理性的,因为他们以最小化损失的方式积极地将来自机制的信息与自己的附带信息结合起来。在这种理性行为的假设下,我们证明了对于每一个固定计数查询,几何机制对于所有极小极大信息消费者是普遍最优的。此外,我们的解决方案还可以在信息消费者处于不同隐私级别时以防止共谋的方式发布查询结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信