{"title":"Hans Döllgast, post-war reconstruction and modern architecture","authors":"M. Sternberg","doi":"10.1080/13602365.2022.2086152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The works of post-war reconstruction in Munich by the German architect Hans Döllgast (1891–1974) have become a reference point for interpretative modern architectural responses to damaged heritage. In the context of Berlin’s museum restorations of the past fifteen years, leading designers from David Chipperfield to Roger Diener have paid tribute to Döllgast’s inspirational restitution of the Alte Pinakothek art museum in Munich in the 1950s. This article revisits Döllgast’s contribution to reconstruction by drawing on a wider corpus of his writings. Döllgast’s critical attitude to Modernism is examined not as a quirk, but rather as a key to his distinct achievements in reconstruction. Unlike existing accounts that assess his work by case studies, the article focuses on cross-cutting themes in Döllgast’s approach. It challenges the tendency to over-privilege the iconography of ruination in Döllgast and draws attention to his underlying interest in continuity in modern architecture.","PeriodicalId":44236,"journal":{"name":"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture","volume":"222 1","pages":"260 - 295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2022.2086152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The works of post-war reconstruction in Munich by the German architect Hans Döllgast (1891–1974) have become a reference point for interpretative modern architectural responses to damaged heritage. In the context of Berlin’s museum restorations of the past fifteen years, leading designers from David Chipperfield to Roger Diener have paid tribute to Döllgast’s inspirational restitution of the Alte Pinakothek art museum in Munich in the 1950s. This article revisits Döllgast’s contribution to reconstruction by drawing on a wider corpus of his writings. Döllgast’s critical attitude to Modernism is examined not as a quirk, but rather as a key to his distinct achievements in reconstruction. Unlike existing accounts that assess his work by case studies, the article focuses on cross-cutting themes in Döllgast’s approach. It challenges the tendency to over-privilege the iconography of ruination in Döllgast and draws attention to his underlying interest in continuity in modern architecture.
期刊介绍:
METU JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE is a biannual refereed publication of the Middle East Technical University published every June and December, and offers a comprehensive range of articles contributing to the development of knowledge in man-environment relations, design and planning. METU JFA accepts submissions in English or Turkish, and assumes that the manuscripts received by the Journal have not been published previously or that are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Editorial Board claims no responsibility for the opinions expressed in the published manuscripts. METU JFA invites theory, research and history papers on the following fields and related interdisciplinary topics: architecture and urbanism, planning and design, restoration and preservation, buildings and building systems technologies and design, product design and technologies. Prospective manuscripts for publication in these fields may constitute; 1. Original theoretical papers; 2. Original research papers; 3. Documents and critical expositions; 4. Applied studies related to professional practice; 5. Educational works, commentaries and reviews; 6. Book reviews Manuscripts, in English or Turkish, have to be approved by the Editorial Board, which are then forwarded to Referees before acceptance for publication. The Board claims no responsibility for the opinions expressed in the published manuscripts. It is assumed that the manuscripts received by the Journal are not sent to other journals for publication purposes and have not been previously published elsewhere.