Comparative Analysis of SMEs Intensity in Ukraine and Indonesia Using FIS Approach

IF 2.4 Q2 ECONOMICS

Contemporary Economics Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.5709/ce.1897-9254.499

Evi Thelia Sari, Vitalli Gryga

{"title":"Comparative Analysis of SMEs Intensity in Ukraine and Indonesia Using FIS Approach","authors":"Evi Thelia Sari, Vitalli Gryga","doi":"10.5709/ce.1897-9254.499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to describe and examine the development of SMEs in Ukraine and Indonesia based on productivity factors of SMEs development measured SMEs contribution to the country’s GDP. The study is based on data from 2000 to 2014, on number of SMEs, contribution of SMEs to GDP, labor in SMEs sectors, exports and import contributions to GDP of each country. Under complex data with uncertainty, Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) was applied to modelling process in estimating the differences between SMEs development in Ukraine and Indonesia. FIS models show the needs to improve policies on SMEs in each country of this study. We found that SMEs intensity development in Ukraine needs more SMEs to increase contribution to GDP and stipulate economic growth. While in Indonesia, growth in quantities of either labors or numbers of SMEs can be problematic, so it should focus on labors quality. Trade openness e.g., ratio export and import to GDP, shows that while Ukraine’s SMEs contribution to GDP is lower, the ratio of Export and Import to GDP is increasing. Whereas Indonesia’s ratio of export and import to GDP increases along with the SMEs contribution to GDP. The policies to increase the intensity development of SMEs in both countries should focus on increasing the quality of labors hired in SMEs, increasing the numbers of SMEs, reviewing and selecting the commodities that are prioritized to export and import in enhancing the ratio of export and import to GDP.","PeriodicalId":44824,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe and examine the development of SMEs in Ukraine and Indonesia based on productivity factors of SMEs development measured SMEs contribution to the country’s GDP. The study is based on data from 2000 to 2014, on number of SMEs, contribution of SMEs to GDP, labor in SMEs sectors, exports and import contributions to GDP of each country. Under complex data with uncertainty, Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) was applied to modelling process in estimating the differences between SMEs development in Ukraine and Indonesia. FIS models show the needs to improve policies on SMEs in each country of this study. We found that SMEs intensity development in Ukraine needs more SMEs to increase contribution to GDP and stipulate economic growth. While in Indonesia, growth in quantities of either labors or numbers of SMEs can be problematic, so it should focus on labors quality. Trade openness e.g., ratio export and import to GDP, shows that while Ukraine’s SMEs contribution to GDP is lower, the ratio of Export and Import to GDP is increasing. Whereas Indonesia’s ratio of export and import to GDP increases along with the SMEs contribution to GDP. The policies to increase the intensity development of SMEs in both countries should focus on increasing the quality of labors hired in SMEs, increasing the numbers of SMEs, reviewing and selecting the commodities that are prioritized to export and import in enhancing the ratio of export and import to GDP.

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于FIS方法的乌克兰与印尼中小企业密集度比较分析

本研究的目的是描述和考察乌克兰和印度尼西亚中小企业的发展基于中小企业发展的生产力因素衡量中小企业对国家GDP的贡献。该研究基于2000年至2014年的数据，包括中小企业数量、中小企业对GDP的贡献、中小企业部门的劳动力、出口和进口对GDP的贡献。在具有不确定性的复杂数据下，运用模糊推理系统(FIS)对乌克兰和印度尼西亚中小企业发展差异进行建模。FIS模型表明，本研究涉及的每个国家都需要改进中小企业政策。研究发现，乌克兰中小企业强度的发展需要更多的中小企业来提高对GDP的贡献，从而促进经济增长。而在印度尼西亚，无论是劳动力数量还是中小企业数量的增长都可能存在问题，因此应注重劳动力质量。贸易开放度，如进出口占GDP的比例，表明乌克兰中小企业对GDP的贡献较低，但出口和进口占GDP的比例在上升。而印尼的进出口占GDP的比例随着中小企业对GDP的贡献而增加。两国提高中小企业发展强度的政策应侧重于提高中小企业的劳动力质量，增加中小企业的数量，审查和选择优先进出口的商品，以提高进出口占GDP的比例。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Contemporary Economics ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

3.70

自引率

9.50%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： The mission of the Contemporary Economics is to publish advanced theoretical and empirical research in economics, finance, accounting and management with the noticeable contribution and impact to the development of those disciplines and preferably with practice relevancies. All entirety of methods is desirable, including a falsification of conventional understanding, theory building through inductive or qualitative research, first empirical testing of a theory, meta-analysis with theoretical implications, constructive replication that clarifies the boundaries or range of a theory for theoretical research as well as qualitative, quantitative, field, laboratory, meta-analytic, and combination for an empirical research. This clear priority for comprehensive manuscripts containing a methodology-based theoretical and empirical research with implications and recommendations for policymaking does not exclude manuscripts entirely focused on theory or methodology. Manuscripts that raise significant, actual topics of international relevance will be highly appreciated. The interdisciplinary approach including – besides economic, financial, accounting or managerial –also other aspects, is welcomed.