Relationship between hedonic preference and audio quality in tests of music production quality

A. Wilson, B. Fazenda
{"title":"Relationship between hedonic preference and audio quality in tests of music production quality","authors":"A. Wilson, B. Fazenda","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many subjective listening tests, audio is evaluated on either “quality” or “preference”. These terms are often conflated. Little evidence has been gathered which explains the subtle differences between these terms in audio perception - we may not necessarily prefer high-quality audio samples. In the case of music, hedonic preference is strongly related to familiarity with the audio samples, which is informed by one's musical tastes, itself based on autobiographical memory. However, for unfamiliar music, the two concepts can overlap considerably. This paper will explore the relationship between these two concepts in three experiments - with familiar music, unfamiliar music and alternate mixes of an unfamiliar song. It was shown that quality ratings and like ratings become more correlated when familiarity is removed and also when inter-song variation is removed. For the case of music mixes, both concepts are strongly correlated (R2=0.82), although there are subtle differences in the ways these ratings were described by participants.","PeriodicalId":6645,"journal":{"name":"2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","volume":"144 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In many subjective listening tests, audio is evaluated on either “quality” or “preference”. These terms are often conflated. Little evidence has been gathered which explains the subtle differences between these terms in audio perception - we may not necessarily prefer high-quality audio samples. In the case of music, hedonic preference is strongly related to familiarity with the audio samples, which is informed by one's musical tastes, itself based on autobiographical memory. However, for unfamiliar music, the two concepts can overlap considerably. This paper will explore the relationship between these two concepts in three experiments - with familiar music, unfamiliar music and alternate mixes of an unfamiliar song. It was shown that quality ratings and like ratings become more correlated when familiarity is removed and also when inter-song variation is removed. For the case of music mixes, both concepts are strongly correlated (R2=0.82), although there are subtle differences in the ways these ratings were described by participants.
音乐制作质量测试中享乐偏好与音质的关系
在许多主观听力测试中,音频是根据“质量”或“偏好”来评估的。这些术语经常被混为一谈。几乎没有证据可以解释这些术语在音频感知方面的细微差异——我们可能不一定更喜欢高质量的音频样本。就音乐而言,享乐偏好与对音频样本的熟悉程度密切相关,这是由一个人的音乐品味决定的,而音乐品味本身是基于自传式记忆的。然而,对于不熟悉的音乐,这两个概念可能会有很大的重叠。本文将在三个实验中探讨这两个概念之间的关系-熟悉的音乐,不熟悉的音乐和不熟悉的歌曲的交替混音。研究表明,当去除熟悉度和歌曲间的变化时,质量评级和喜欢评级变得更加相关。对于音乐混合的情况,这两个概念是强烈相关的(R2=0.82),尽管参与者在描述这些评级的方式上有细微的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信