Anti-Anti-Culturalism: A Response to Edward Bever’s “Culture Warrior”

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Ostling
{"title":"Anti-Anti-Culturalism: A Response to Edward Bever’s “Culture Warrior”","authors":"M. Ostling","doi":"10.5325/PRETERNATURE.5.2.0237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract: In this note, I respond to Edward Bever’s response to my critical review of his Realities of Witchcraft (Preternature 4, no. 2 [2015]: 203–10). While Bever’s response portrays me as a “culture warrior” (Preternature 5, no. 1 [2016]: 112–20), I prefer to seek a cessation of hostilities between cultural and neurobiological approaches to magic and witchcraft. I suggest that, despite Bever’s response, my original worry that his approach is reductively “anti-culturalist” remains warranted, but also point toward the possibility for rapprochement between our respective positions.","PeriodicalId":41216,"journal":{"name":"Preternature-Critical and Historical Studies on the Preternatural","volume":"177 1","pages":"237 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preternature-Critical and Historical Studies on the Preternatural","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/PRETERNATURE.5.2.0237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

abstract: In this note, I respond to Edward Bever’s response to my critical review of his Realities of Witchcraft (Preternature 4, no. 2 [2015]: 203–10). While Bever’s response portrays me as a “culture warrior” (Preternature 5, no. 1 [2016]: 112–20), I prefer to seek a cessation of hostilities between cultural and neurobiological approaches to magic and witchcraft. I suggest that, despite Bever’s response, my original worry that his approach is reductively “anti-culturalist” remains warranted, but also point toward the possibility for rapprochement between our respective positions.
反-反-文化主义:对爱德华·比弗“文化战士”的回应
在这篇文章中,我对爱德华·贝弗(Edward Bever)对他的《巫术的现实》(《超自然》第4期)的批判性评论作出回应。[2015]: 203-10。贝弗的回答把我描绘成一个“文化战士”(《超自然》第5期,no。1[2016]: 112-20),我更倾向于寻求在文化和神经生物学方法之间停止敌对状态。我认为,尽管贝弗的回应,我最初担心他的方法是简化的“反文化主义”仍然是有道理的,但也指出了我们各自立场之间和解的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Preternature provides an interdisciplinary, inclusive forum for the study of topics that stand in the liminal space between the known world and the inexplicable. The journal embraces a broad and dynamic definition of the preternatural that encompasses the weird and uncanny—magic, witchcraft, spiritualism, occultism, esotericism, demonology, monstrophy, and more, recognizing that the areas of magic, religion, and science are fluid and that their intersections should continue to be explored, contextualized, and challenged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信