{"title":"The Rescue of Jerusalem: The Alliance between Hebrews and Africans in 701 BC","authors":"Abraham Rzepkowicz","doi":"10.5860/choice.40-2943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author: Henry T. Aubin Doubleday Canada: Toronto ISBN: 0-385-659-12-1 Price: $27.55 After a hiatus of nearly a millennium, Jerusalem has once again become a major focal point in the ongoing history of humanity. With the end of the Crusades, Europe and the Middle East, Christianity and Islam, turned their attention to other issues and other locales. As their respective empires and caliphates rose and fell through the centuries, Jerusalem was relegated to provincial insignificance, though it continued to serve as a beacon for the monotheistic religions whose roots, whether direct or indirect, were planted there. Mr. Aubin, as he develops his thesis in The Rescue of Jerusalem, challenges us to picture in our minds the potential scenario wherein all this emphasis on Jerusalem and the spiritual legacy engendered there would never have made any imprint beyond perhaps an archaeological footnote. It would be a piece of trivia in the annals of a civilized world totally unrecognizable and essentially inconceivable to modern man. Such was the possibility in 701 BCE, when the Assyrians under Sennacherib once again invaded the Near East to put down another local attempt at rebellion. This unstoppable Assyria, the most extensive empire to come out of Asia, came to put down insurrection and disloyalty with cruel devastation and inexorable exile. Only a few decades earlier, the rebellious Northern Kingdom of Israel had met such a fate, giving rise to the concept of the Ten Lost Tribes which lingers to this day. When King Hezekiah of Judah attempted to shake off the suzerainty of Assyria, he brought his kingdom to the brink of a similar fate. As Mr. Aubin points out, in 1998, The Quarterly Journal of Military History asked 37 historians to identify the military engagement of greatest historical import. Among the suggestions, was the Greek victory over the Persians and the English victory over the Spanish Armada. Just imagine the course of human history had the outcome of these events been different. What would history have been like had Sennacherib not withdrawn from the gates of Jerusalem? Going along with the argument of Professor William H. McNiell, author of The Rise of the West, the journal agreed with his view: \"Surely, there is no greater might have-been-in all recorded history.\" What had saved Judah? Mr. Aubin spends the bulk of the book investigating this intriguing question. As indicated by his citations from many scholarly sources and more than 100 pages of footnotes, he deals in depth, both historically and textually, with the Biblical, Assyrian, and Greek sources. The Assyrian sources, whether documentary or bas-relief sculpture, speak of a great victory in an obviously self-serving manner. As the author points out, the failure to indicate the capture of Jerusalem, an obviously key target as the capital of the rebellious province, speaks for itself. The Biblical accounts of an avenging angel slaughtering the invading army, in a literal understanding of the passages, or a plague decimating the forces in a metaphorical approach, both seem too overtly a theological interpretation seeking to discern Divine intervention in the events which were unfolding. The need for the Assyrians to withdraw and address unrest in Babylonia does not appear to fit in with the historical context of the events around Jerusalem campaign. The Greek historian, Herodotus, writing several centuries later, brings an Egyptian folk account of mice attacking and destroying the Assyrian equipment and triggering a hasty retreat with Egyptian forces in pursuit. None of the explanations are satisfactory as can be seen by the ongoing discussions. Several scholars have even given up any hope of clarifying the issue unless some new as yet undiscovered documentation would be forthcoming. Scouring the Middle East of the period for another explanation of the rescue of Jerusalem, the author suggests considering the only other force capable of challenging Assyria with any super-power credentials. …","PeriodicalId":85784,"journal":{"name":"The Western journal of black studies","volume":"121 1","pages":"141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Western journal of black studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.40-2943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Author: Henry T. Aubin Doubleday Canada: Toronto ISBN: 0-385-659-12-1 Price: $27.55 After a hiatus of nearly a millennium, Jerusalem has once again become a major focal point in the ongoing history of humanity. With the end of the Crusades, Europe and the Middle East, Christianity and Islam, turned their attention to other issues and other locales. As their respective empires and caliphates rose and fell through the centuries, Jerusalem was relegated to provincial insignificance, though it continued to serve as a beacon for the monotheistic religions whose roots, whether direct or indirect, were planted there. Mr. Aubin, as he develops his thesis in The Rescue of Jerusalem, challenges us to picture in our minds the potential scenario wherein all this emphasis on Jerusalem and the spiritual legacy engendered there would never have made any imprint beyond perhaps an archaeological footnote. It would be a piece of trivia in the annals of a civilized world totally unrecognizable and essentially inconceivable to modern man. Such was the possibility in 701 BCE, when the Assyrians under Sennacherib once again invaded the Near East to put down another local attempt at rebellion. This unstoppable Assyria, the most extensive empire to come out of Asia, came to put down insurrection and disloyalty with cruel devastation and inexorable exile. Only a few decades earlier, the rebellious Northern Kingdom of Israel had met such a fate, giving rise to the concept of the Ten Lost Tribes which lingers to this day. When King Hezekiah of Judah attempted to shake off the suzerainty of Assyria, he brought his kingdom to the brink of a similar fate. As Mr. Aubin points out, in 1998, The Quarterly Journal of Military History asked 37 historians to identify the military engagement of greatest historical import. Among the suggestions, was the Greek victory over the Persians and the English victory over the Spanish Armada. Just imagine the course of human history had the outcome of these events been different. What would history have been like had Sennacherib not withdrawn from the gates of Jerusalem? Going along with the argument of Professor William H. McNiell, author of The Rise of the West, the journal agreed with his view: "Surely, there is no greater might have-been-in all recorded history." What had saved Judah? Mr. Aubin spends the bulk of the book investigating this intriguing question. As indicated by his citations from many scholarly sources and more than 100 pages of footnotes, he deals in depth, both historically and textually, with the Biblical, Assyrian, and Greek sources. The Assyrian sources, whether documentary or bas-relief sculpture, speak of a great victory in an obviously self-serving manner. As the author points out, the failure to indicate the capture of Jerusalem, an obviously key target as the capital of the rebellious province, speaks for itself. The Biblical accounts of an avenging angel slaughtering the invading army, in a literal understanding of the passages, or a plague decimating the forces in a metaphorical approach, both seem too overtly a theological interpretation seeking to discern Divine intervention in the events which were unfolding. The need for the Assyrians to withdraw and address unrest in Babylonia does not appear to fit in with the historical context of the events around Jerusalem campaign. The Greek historian, Herodotus, writing several centuries later, brings an Egyptian folk account of mice attacking and destroying the Assyrian equipment and triggering a hasty retreat with Egyptian forces in pursuit. None of the explanations are satisfactory as can be seen by the ongoing discussions. Several scholars have even given up any hope of clarifying the issue unless some new as yet undiscovered documentation would be forthcoming. Scouring the Middle East of the period for another explanation of the rescue of Jerusalem, the author suggests considering the only other force capable of challenging Assyria with any super-power credentials. …
作者:Henry T. Aubin Doubleday加拿大:多伦多ISBN: 0-385-659-12-1价格:27.55美元在中断了近一千年之后,耶路撒冷再次成为人类历史上的一个主要焦点。随着十字军东征的结束,欧洲和中东,基督教和伊斯兰教,将他们的注意力转向了其他问题和其他地区。几个世纪以来,随着他们各自的帝国和哈里发的兴衰,耶路撒冷被贬为无足轻重的地方,尽管它继续作为一神论宗教的灯塔,其根源无论是直接的还是间接的,都植根于那里。奥宾先生在《拯救耶路撒冷》一书中阐述了他的论点,让我们在脑海中想象出一种可能的情景,在这种情况下,所有对耶路撒冷的强调以及在那里产生的精神遗产,可能永远不会留下任何印记,除了考古学的脚注。这将是文明世界史册上的一件小事,对现代人来说,这是完全无法辨认的,基本上是不可想象的。公元前701年,当西拿基立领导的亚述人再次入侵近东,镇压当地的另一次叛乱时,这种可能性就出现了。这个不可阻挡的亚述帝国,是亚洲出现的最庞大的帝国,以残酷的破坏和无情的流放来镇压叛乱和不忠。就在几十年前,反叛的北国以色列也遭遇了这样的命运,由此产生了至今仍在流传的“失落的十个部落”的概念。当犹大王希西家试图摆脱亚述的宗主权时,他把自己的王国带到了类似命运的边缘。正如奥宾所指出的,1998年,《军事历史季刊》(Quarterly Journal of Military History)请37位历史学家找出历史上最重要的军事行动。其中包括希腊战胜波斯人和英国战胜西班牙无敌舰队。想象一下,如果这些事件的结果是不同的,人类历史的进程会是什么样子。如果西拿基立没有从耶路撒冷的城门撤退,历史会变成什么样子?《华尔街日报》赞同《西方的崛起》一书的作者威廉·h·麦克尼尔教授的观点,同意他的观点:“毫无疑问,在所有有记载的历史中,没有比这更伟大的了。”是什么拯救了犹大?奥宾用了书的大部分篇幅来研究这个有趣的问题。从他对许多学术资料的引用和100多页的脚注可以看出,他在历史和文本上都深入研究了圣经、亚述和希腊的资料。亚述人的资料,无论是文献还是浅浮雕,都以一种明显的自私自利的方式讲述了一场伟大的胜利。正如作者所指出的那样,未能表明占领耶路撒冷,作为反叛省份的首府,显然是一个关键目标,这本身就说明了问题。圣经中对复仇天使屠杀入侵军队的描述,从字面上理解,或者一场瘟疫以隐喻的方式摧毁了军队,两者似乎都过于明显地是一种神学解释,试图分辨出神对正在展开的事件的干预。亚述人需要撤退并解决巴比伦的动乱似乎与耶路撒冷战役周围事件的历史背景不相符。希腊历史学家希罗多德(Herodotus)在几个世纪后的著作中记载了一段埃及民间故事:老鼠攻击并摧毁了亚述人的装备,导致他们在埃及军队的追击下匆忙撤退。从正在进行的讨论中可以看出,这些解释都不令人满意。一些学者甚至放弃了澄清这一问题的任何希望,除非出现一些尚未被发现的新文献。作者仔细研究了这一时期的中东地区,以寻找拯救耶路撒冷的另一种解释,他建议考虑另一支有能力挑战亚述的超级大国资格的力量。…