Prescription and efficacy of daclatasvir and sofosbuvir ± ribavirin for hepatitis C infection, including patient-reported outcomes, in routine practice in three European countries: The CMPASS-EU cohort study

S. Bourgeois, K. J. Erpecum, J. Delwaide, Ulrike Naumann, S. Christensen, Christophe Moreno, A. Pathil, E. Schippers, Nancy van Emmerik, Benoit Caritey, C. Fischer, F. Mercier, J. Petersen
{"title":"Prescription and efficacy of daclatasvir and sofosbuvir ± ribavirin for hepatitis C infection, including patient-reported outcomes, in routine practice in three European countries: The CMPASS-EU cohort study","authors":"S. Bourgeois, K. J. Erpecum, J. Delwaide, Ulrike Naumann, S. Christensen, Christophe Moreno, A. Pathil, E. Schippers, Nancy van Emmerik, Benoit Caritey, C. Fischer, F. Mercier, J. Petersen","doi":"10.1080/2331205X.2020.1727169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Prescription and efficacy of daclatasvir and sofosbuvir ± ribavirin, including patient-reported outcomes, in routine practice in three European countries: the CMPASS-EU cohort study. Objectives: To identify patient characteristics associated with routine prescription of daclatasvir (DCV) in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and evaluate effectiveness, safety and quality-of-life (QoL) changes for DCV-based regimens. Methods: A prospective, observational cohort study in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands collected baseline data from all patients initiating a new HCV regimen, with 12-month follow-up of DCV-based treatments. Baseline predictors of prescription, longitudinal efficacy, and patient-reported QoL outcomes (EQ-5D, EQ-VAS and SF-36 global physical/mental health) on DCV were assessed. Results: Of 914 patients analyzed, 470 were prescribed DCV (469 with sofosbuvir [SOF] ± ribavirin [RBV]) and 444 non-DCV regimens. A high proportion prescribed DCV were cirrhotic (36%) and/or illicit drug users (IDU; 24%). Multivariate predictors of DCV treatment included genotype 3 infection (odds ratio 85.9 [95% confidence interval 43.5–170]), age ≥65 years (2.0 [1.2–3.3]), and cirrhosis (3.3 [2.0–5.3]). Sustained virologic response on DCV+SOF±RBV (observed) was 96–100% across subgroups of IDU, HIV co-infection, HCV genotype and cirrhosis status. Statistically significant improvements in all QoL outcomes were observed over 12 months of DCV+SOF±RBV irrespective of RBV use or cirrhosis status, but IDU had no change in SF-36 global mental health although other outcomes improved. Conclusions: In this cohort, DCV+SOF±RBV was efficacious for HCV treatment across a range of subgroups and associated with QoL improvements.","PeriodicalId":10470,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Medicine","volume":"833 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2020.1727169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Prescription and efficacy of daclatasvir and sofosbuvir ± ribavirin, including patient-reported outcomes, in routine practice in three European countries: the CMPASS-EU cohort study. Objectives: To identify patient characteristics associated with routine prescription of daclatasvir (DCV) in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and evaluate effectiveness, safety and quality-of-life (QoL) changes for DCV-based regimens. Methods: A prospective, observational cohort study in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands collected baseline data from all patients initiating a new HCV regimen, with 12-month follow-up of DCV-based treatments. Baseline predictors of prescription, longitudinal efficacy, and patient-reported QoL outcomes (EQ-5D, EQ-VAS and SF-36 global physical/mental health) on DCV were assessed. Results: Of 914 patients analyzed, 470 were prescribed DCV (469 with sofosbuvir [SOF] ± ribavirin [RBV]) and 444 non-DCV regimens. A high proportion prescribed DCV were cirrhotic (36%) and/or illicit drug users (IDU; 24%). Multivariate predictors of DCV treatment included genotype 3 infection (odds ratio 85.9 [95% confidence interval 43.5–170]), age ≥65 years (2.0 [1.2–3.3]), and cirrhosis (3.3 [2.0–5.3]). Sustained virologic response on DCV+SOF±RBV (observed) was 96–100% across subgroups of IDU, HIV co-infection, HCV genotype and cirrhosis status. Statistically significant improvements in all QoL outcomes were observed over 12 months of DCV+SOF±RBV irrespective of RBV use or cirrhosis status, but IDU had no change in SF-36 global mental health although other outcomes improved. Conclusions: In this cohort, DCV+SOF±RBV was efficacious for HCV treatment across a range of subgroups and associated with QoL improvements.
在三个欧洲国家的常规实践中,daclatasvir和索非布韦±利巴韦林治疗丙型肝炎感染的处方和疗效,包括患者报告的结果:cmpas - eu队列研究
在三个欧洲国家的常规实践中,daclatasvir和索非布韦±利巴韦林的处方和疗效,包括患者报告的结果:CMPASS-EU队列研究。目的:确定慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染患者常规处方daclatasvir (DCV)相关的患者特征,并评估基于DCV的方案的有效性、安全性和生活质量(QoL)变化。方法:在德国、比利时和荷兰进行了一项前瞻性、观察性队列研究,收集了所有开始新的HCV方案的患者的基线数据,并对基于dcv的治疗进行了12个月的随访。对处方、纵向疗效和患者报告的生活质量结果(EQ-5D、EQ-VAS和SF-36整体身心健康)的基线预测因子进行DCV评估。结果:在分析的914例患者中,470例使用DCV(469例使用索非布韦[SOF]±利巴韦林[RBV]), 444例使用非DCV方案。很大比例的处方DCV是肝硬化(36%)和/或非法药物使用者(IDU;24%)。DCV治疗的多因素预测因子包括基因3型感染(优势比85.9[95%可信区间43.5-170])、年龄≥65岁(比值比2.0[1.2-3.3])和肝硬化(比值比3.3[2.0 - 5.3])。在IDU、HIV合并感染、HCV基因型和肝硬化状态亚组中,DCV+SOF±RBV的持续病毒学应答(观察)为96-100%。在12个月的时间里,无论使用RBV或肝硬化情况如何,DCV+SOF±RBV组的所有生活质量结果均有统计学上的显著改善,但IDU对SF-36整体心理健康没有影响,尽管其他结果有所改善。结论:在该队列中,DCV+SOF±RBV在一系列亚组中对HCV治疗有效,并与生活质量改善相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信