Beggar Your Neighbour

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
V. Munoz-Dardé, M. G. Martín
{"title":"Beggar Your Neighbour","authors":"V. Munoz-Dardé, M. G. Martín","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199609222.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at moral justifications for funding welfare benefits through general taxation rather than seeking to support it through charitable giving. That is, the parties to the debate are assumed to accept the moral imperative to support the destitute, and the political question is whether there is any requirement to do so through taxation. The chapter explores parallels between begging and the raising of charitable donations, highlighting not only the costs of begging on supplicants, but those that fall as well on the would-be donors. In the light of this, the chapter offers a justification for using taxation as a preferred way of raising resources for the provision of welfare benefits which has echoes of, but contrasts with, a famous proposal by Thomas Nagel.","PeriodicalId":36556,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Australian Taxation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Australian Taxation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199609222.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter looks at moral justifications for funding welfare benefits through general taxation rather than seeking to support it through charitable giving. That is, the parties to the debate are assumed to accept the moral imperative to support the destitute, and the political question is whether there is any requirement to do so through taxation. The chapter explores parallels between begging and the raising of charitable donations, highlighting not only the costs of begging on supplicants, but those that fall as well on the would-be donors. In the light of this, the chapter offers a justification for using taxation as a preferred way of raising resources for the provision of welfare benefits which has echoes of, but contrasts with, a famous proposal by Thomas Nagel.
向邻居乞讨
本章着眼于通过一般税收而不是通过慈善捐赠为福利提供资金的道德理由。也就是说,辩论的各方都被假定接受支持穷人的道德责任,而政治问题是是否有必要通过税收来做到这一点。这一章探讨了乞讨和筹集慈善捐款之间的相似之处,不仅强调了乞讨者的成本,也强调了那些落在潜在捐赠者身上的成本。鉴于此,本章为使用税收作为筹集福利资源的首选方式提供了一个理由,这与托马斯·内格尔的一个著名提议相呼应,但又形成了对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Australian Taxation
Journal of Australian Taxation Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信