{"title":"The ratio of the gift prohibition among spouses monopolization of the matrimonial law in the dotal regime","authors":"J. F. Stagl","doi":"10.1163/15718190-08512p06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ratio behind the prohibition for spouses to donate to each other. Monopolising matrimonial property law in the dotal system. The present inquiry is based on the premise that the riddle of the highly contested rationale of the prohibition of donations between spouses can only be solved by taking into account the legal basis of this prohibition. The classical jurists treated the prohibition within the ius dotium, shorthand for 'matrimonial property regime', a legal matter heavily transformed by the lex Iulia et Papia which followed the goal of inciting the upper class to get married which would guarantee the desired offspring and control over the Emperor's subjects. Considering the palingenetic context of the treatises on the prohibition, the lex Iulia et Papia is to be considered the legal basis of the prohibition which, therefore, has the purpose of channelling all economical transactions between the spouses into the ius dotium which in turn serves the goals of the lex Iulia et Papia. To sum it up: The prohibition was another legal ordinance in Augustus' arsenal serving his fight for moral renewal, that is to say limitation of civil liberties, and the consolidation of his power.","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08512p06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The ratio behind the prohibition for spouses to donate to each other. Monopolising matrimonial property law in the dotal system. The present inquiry is based on the premise that the riddle of the highly contested rationale of the prohibition of donations between spouses can only be solved by taking into account the legal basis of this prohibition. The classical jurists treated the prohibition within the ius dotium, shorthand for 'matrimonial property regime', a legal matter heavily transformed by the lex Iulia et Papia which followed the goal of inciting the upper class to get married which would guarantee the desired offspring and control over the Emperor's subjects. Considering the palingenetic context of the treatises on the prohibition, the lex Iulia et Papia is to be considered the legal basis of the prohibition which, therefore, has the purpose of channelling all economical transactions between the spouses into the ius dotium which in turn serves the goals of the lex Iulia et Papia. To sum it up: The prohibition was another legal ordinance in Augustus' arsenal serving his fight for moral renewal, that is to say limitation of civil liberties, and the consolidation of his power.
禁止配偶相互捐赠背后的比例。垄断式婚姻财产法律制度。目前的调查是基于这样一个前提,即只有考虑到这一禁令的法律基础,才能解决关于禁止配偶之间捐赠的理由的高度争议的谜题。古典法学家在ius dotium(婚姻财产制度)中处理禁令,这是婚姻财产制度的简写,这一法律问题被民法和帕皮亚法(lex Iulia et Papia)彻底改变了,它的目标是鼓励上层阶级结婚,以保证期望的后代和对皇帝臣民的控制。考虑到关于禁止的论述的旧遗传学背景,《民法和帕皮亚法》应被视为禁止的法律基础,因此,禁止的目的是将配偶之间的所有经济交易纳入《民法和帕皮亚法》,这反过来又有助于《民法和帕皮亚法》的目标。总而言之,禁酒令是奥古斯都武器库中的另一项法律法令,用于他为道德更新而战,也就是说,限制公民自由,巩固他的权力。
期刊介绍:
The Legal History Review, inspired by E.M. Meijers, is a peer-reviewed journal and was founded in 1918 by a number of Dutch jurists, who set out to stimulate scholarly interest in legal history in their own country and also to provide a centre for international cooperation in the subject. This has gradually through the years been achieved. The Review had already become one of the leading internationally known periodicals in the field before 1940. Since 1950 when it emerged under Belgo-Dutch editorship its position strengthened. Much attention is paid not only to the common foundations of the western legal tradition but also to the special, frequently divergent development of national law in the various countries belonging to, or influenced by it.