J. Dillon, M. Rickinson, Kelly Teamey, M. Morris, Mee-Young Choi, D. Sanders, P. Benefield
{"title":"The value of outdoor learning: evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere","authors":"J. Dillon, M. Rickinson, Kelly Teamey, M. Morris, Mee-Young Choi, D. Sanders, P. Benefield","doi":"10.4324/9781315730486-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article summarises the key findings of a review of the research into outdoor learning published between 1993 and 2003. It summarises what is known about the impacts of fieldwork and then discusses what is known about effective practice before concluding with a look at barriers to fieldwork. This article summarises the key findings of a review that critically examined 150 pieces of research on outdoor learning published between 1993 and 2003 (Rickinson et al. , 2004). The Field Studies Council and partner organisations commissioned the review in response to the growing concern that opportunities for outdoor learning by school students in England have decreased substantially in recent years (Harris, 1999; Barker, Slingsby and Tilling, 2002). We found substantial evidence to indicate that fieldwork, properly conceived, adequately planned, well taught and effectively followed up, offers learners opportunities to develop their knowledge and skills in ways that add value to their everyday experiences in the classroom. In this article we distil some of the review’s findings of particular relevance to secondary school teachers. We look first at the impacts of fieldwork and outdoor educational visits, and then discuss what is known about effective practice before concluding with a look at barriers to fieldwork. The impacts of fieldwork and outdoor educational visits","PeriodicalId":83260,"journal":{"name":"The School science review","volume":"60 1","pages":"107-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"465","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The School science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315730486-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 465
Abstract
This article summarises the key findings of a review of the research into outdoor learning published between 1993 and 2003. It summarises what is known about the impacts of fieldwork and then discusses what is known about effective practice before concluding with a look at barriers to fieldwork. This article summarises the key findings of a review that critically examined 150 pieces of research on outdoor learning published between 1993 and 2003 (Rickinson et al. , 2004). The Field Studies Council and partner organisations commissioned the review in response to the growing concern that opportunities for outdoor learning by school students in England have decreased substantially in recent years (Harris, 1999; Barker, Slingsby and Tilling, 2002). We found substantial evidence to indicate that fieldwork, properly conceived, adequately planned, well taught and effectively followed up, offers learners opportunities to develop their knowledge and skills in ways that add value to their everyday experiences in the classroom. In this article we distil some of the review’s findings of particular relevance to secondary school teachers. We look first at the impacts of fieldwork and outdoor educational visits, and then discuss what is known about effective practice before concluding with a look at barriers to fieldwork. The impacts of fieldwork and outdoor educational visits