Care as symbolic exile: The diversity work of Slovak gender studies scholars

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Veronika Valkovičová, Zuzana Maďarová
{"title":"Care as symbolic exile: The diversity work of Slovak gender studies scholars","authors":"Veronika Valkovičová, Zuzana Maďarová","doi":"10.17356/ieejsp.v8i4.1006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, science has become a battlefield where the lines of the gendered world order are being negotiated. This negotiation cannot be understood without examining the epistemic communities of gender studies – their members, practices, conditions, and the power relations within which they operate. This study aims to enrich the research on gender and feminist scholarship from the perspective of a country with a weak degree of institutionalisation of gender studies. It focuses on the experiences of PhD candidates and early career scholars of social sciences in Slovakia, as narrated in two focus group discussions. We argue that the combination of fragmentation in gender-oriented epistemic communities and the competitiveness of neoliberalised academia pushes junior gender studies scholars to experience isolation, a self-imposed or forced symbolic exile within their institutions and academic communities. However, while the symbolic exile is a space of exclusion, it also is a space of care – for oneself, for others, for one’s institution. The study conceptualises these practices of care as ‘diversity work’ and examines them as both initiatives of individual scholars and invisible everyday labour that maintains the presence of gender-oriented scholarship in an academic environment marked by limited institutionalisation of gender studies.","PeriodicalId":31153,"journal":{"name":"Intersections","volume":"465 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intersections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v8i4.1006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, science has become a battlefield where the lines of the gendered world order are being negotiated. This negotiation cannot be understood without examining the epistemic communities of gender studies – their members, practices, conditions, and the power relations within which they operate. This study aims to enrich the research on gender and feminist scholarship from the perspective of a country with a weak degree of institutionalisation of gender studies. It focuses on the experiences of PhD candidates and early career scholars of social sciences in Slovakia, as narrated in two focus group discussions. We argue that the combination of fragmentation in gender-oriented epistemic communities and the competitiveness of neoliberalised academia pushes junior gender studies scholars to experience isolation, a self-imposed or forced symbolic exile within their institutions and academic communities. However, while the symbolic exile is a space of exclusion, it also is a space of care – for oneself, for others, for one’s institution. The study conceptualises these practices of care as ‘diversity work’ and examines them as both initiatives of individual scholars and invisible everyday labour that maintains the presence of gender-oriented scholarship in an academic environment marked by limited institutionalisation of gender studies.
关怀作为象征性的流亡:斯洛伐克性别研究学者的多元化工作
近年来,科学已经变成了一个战场,人们正在就性别世界秩序的界限进行谈判。如果不考察性别研究的认知共同体——它们的成员、实践、条件和它们运作的权力关系——就无法理解这种协商。本研究旨在从一个性别研究制度化程度较弱的国家的视角,丰富性别与女权主义学术的研究。它侧重于斯洛伐克社会科学博士候选人和早期职业学者的经历,如两个焦点小组讨论所述。我们认为,以性别为导向的认知社区的碎片化与新自由主义学术界的竞争相结合,促使初级性别研究学者在其机构和学术界中经历孤立,自我强加或被迫的象征性流亡。然而,虽然象征性的流放是一个排斥的空间,但它也是一个关心自己、关心他人、关心自己所在机构的空间。该研究将这些护理实践概念化为“多样性工作”,并将其视为学者个人的倡议和无形的日常劳动,这些劳动在性别研究制度化有限的学术环境中维持了以性别为导向的学术的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intersections
Intersections Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Intersections is a peer-reviewed series on interdisciplinary topics in early modern studies. Contributions may come from any of the disciplines within the humanities, such as history, art history, literary history, book history, church history, social history, cultural history, and history of ideas. Each volume focuses on a single theme and consists of essays that explore new perspectives on the subject of study. The series aims to open up new areas of research on early modern culture and to address issues of interest to a wide range of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书