Numerous uncertainties in the multifaceted global trade in frogs’ legs with the EU as the major consumer

IF 1.2 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
M. Auliya, S. Altherr, Charlotte Nithart, Alice C. Hughes, David P Bickford
{"title":"Numerous uncertainties in the multifaceted global trade in frogs’ legs with the EU as the major consumer","authors":"M. Auliya, S. Altherr, Charlotte Nithart, Alice C. Hughes, David P Bickford","doi":"10.3897/natureconservation.51.93868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The commercial trade in frogs and their body parts is global, dynamic and occurs in extremely large volumes (in the thousands of tonnes/yr or billions of frogs/yr). The European Union (EU) remains the single largest importer of frogs’ legs, with most frogs still caught from the wild. Amongst the many drivers of species extinction or population decline (e.g. due to habitat loss, climate change, disease etc.), overexploitation is becoming increasingly more prominent. Due to global declines and extinctions, new attention is being focused on these markets, in part to try to ensure sustainability. While the trade is plagued by daunting realities of data deficiency and uncertainty and the conflicts of commercial interests associated with these data, it is clear is that EU countries are most responsible for the largest portion of the international trade in frogs’ legs of wild species. Over decades of exploitation, the EU imports have contributed to a decline in wild frog populations in an increasing number of supplying countries, such as India and Bangladesh, as well as Indonesia, Turkey and Albania more recently. However, there have been no concerted attempts by the EU and present export countries to ensure sustainability of this trade. Further work is needed to validate species identities, secure data on wild frog populations, establish reasonable monitored harvest/export quotas and disease surveillance and ensure data integrity, quality and security standards for frog farms. Herein, we call upon those countries and their representative governments to assume responsibility for the sustainability of the trade. The EU should take immediate action to channel all imports through a single centralised database and list sensitive species in the Annexes of the EU Wildlife Trade Regulation. Further, listing in CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) can enforce international trade restrictions. More joint efforts are needed to improve regional monitoring schemes before the commercial trade causes irreversible extinctions of populations and species of frogs.","PeriodicalId":54166,"journal":{"name":"Nature Conservation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Conservation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.51.93868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The commercial trade in frogs and their body parts is global, dynamic and occurs in extremely large volumes (in the thousands of tonnes/yr or billions of frogs/yr). The European Union (EU) remains the single largest importer of frogs’ legs, with most frogs still caught from the wild. Amongst the many drivers of species extinction or population decline (e.g. due to habitat loss, climate change, disease etc.), overexploitation is becoming increasingly more prominent. Due to global declines and extinctions, new attention is being focused on these markets, in part to try to ensure sustainability. While the trade is plagued by daunting realities of data deficiency and uncertainty and the conflicts of commercial interests associated with these data, it is clear is that EU countries are most responsible for the largest portion of the international trade in frogs’ legs of wild species. Over decades of exploitation, the EU imports have contributed to a decline in wild frog populations in an increasing number of supplying countries, such as India and Bangladesh, as well as Indonesia, Turkey and Albania more recently. However, there have been no concerted attempts by the EU and present export countries to ensure sustainability of this trade. Further work is needed to validate species identities, secure data on wild frog populations, establish reasonable monitored harvest/export quotas and disease surveillance and ensure data integrity, quality and security standards for frog farms. Herein, we call upon those countries and their representative governments to assume responsibility for the sustainability of the trade. The EU should take immediate action to channel all imports through a single centralised database and list sensitive species in the Annexes of the EU Wildlife Trade Regulation. Further, listing in CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) can enforce international trade restrictions. More joint efforts are needed to improve regional monitoring schemes before the commercial trade causes irreversible extinctions of populations and species of frogs.
Numerous以欧盟为主要消费者的青蛙腿多方面的全球贸易的不确定性
青蛙及其身体部位的商业贸易是全球性的、动态的,而且发生的数量非常大(每年数千吨或数十亿只青蛙)。欧洲联盟(EU)仍然是最大的青蛙腿进口国,大多数青蛙仍然是从野外捕获的。在物种灭绝或人口减少的许多驱动因素中(例如由于栖息地丧失、气候变化、疾病等),过度开发正变得越来越突出。由于全球物种数量下降和灭绝,这些市场正受到新的关注,部分原因是为了确保可持续性。虽然贸易受到数据缺乏和不确定性以及与这些数据相关的商业利益冲突的严峻现实的困扰,但很明显,欧盟国家对野生物种青蛙腿的最大部分国际贸易负有最大责任。经过几十年的开采,欧盟的进口导致越来越多的供应国的野生青蛙数量下降,如印度和孟加拉国,以及最近的印度尼西亚、土耳其和阿尔巴尼亚。然而,欧盟和目前的出口国并没有采取协调一致的措施来确保这种贸易的可持续性。需要进一步开展工作,以验证物种身份、确保野生青蛙种群数据、建立合理的监测收获/出口配额和疾病监测,并确保青蛙养殖场的数据完整性、质量和安全标准。在此,我们呼吁这些国家及其代表政府承担起贸易可持续性的责任。欧盟应立即采取行动,通过单一的中央数据库引导所有进口,并在《欧盟野生动物贸易条例》的附件中列出敏感物种。此外,列入《濒危野生动植物种国际贸易公约》(CITES)可以加强国际贸易限制。在商业贸易导致青蛙种群和物种不可逆转的灭绝之前,需要更多的共同努力来改善区域监测计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Conservation Research
Nature Conservation Research BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信