Reconceptualizing Dominant Discourses in Early Childhood Education: Exploring "Readiness" as an Active-Ethical-Relation.

K. Evans
{"title":"Reconceptualizing Dominant Discourses in Early Childhood Education: Exploring \"Readiness\" as an Active-Ethical-Relation.","authors":"K. Evans","doi":"10.29173/CMPLCT23144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers that the landscape of early childhood education in England is dominated by discourses of 'readiness-for-school' and 'readiness-for-learning’ that act to heavily stratify the educational spaces inhabited by young children.  The 'ready-child' is constructed as a normative identity towards which the ‘unready’ child is expected to progress.  The confinement of children within such predetermined subject positions is considered problematic, as inevitably not all children will achieve these normative ideals, resulting in their exclusion from positions of 'success', as defined by dominant educational narratives.  In response to these concerns, this article seeks to disrupt dominant conceptualizations of 'readiness' in the context of early childhood education, attempting to produce a rupture in the educational landscape, expanding space for alternative ideas, theories and practices.  In a deliberate move away from concepts that relate 'readiness' to predefined goals, outcomes and identities, this article explores the possibility of thinking with a complex logic in order to generate new ideas, understandings and practices.  Approaching complexity from the ‘outside-in’, this paper draws in particular on the concept of 'becoming' (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987), exploring 'readiness' as a complex process of emergence, always open to the unpredictable and the new.  It is argued that ‘readiness’ is part of an open-ended ‘becoming’, rather than a pre-defined ‘state’.  Drawing on the work of Deleuze (1983), Deleuze and Guattari (1987) and Dewey (1899/2010; 1916), this reconceptualized idea of 'readiness' does not hark back to romantic notions that might consider all forms of development equally valid or desirable.  This paper argues, instead, that it matters greatly what and how children ‘become’ and as such, ‘readiness’ for these emergent ‘becomings’ must be considered an ethical and political endeavor.","PeriodicalId":43228,"journal":{"name":"Complicity-An International Journal of Complexity and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complicity-An International Journal of Complexity and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/CMPLCT23144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This paper considers that the landscape of early childhood education in England is dominated by discourses of 'readiness-for-school' and 'readiness-for-learning’ that act to heavily stratify the educational spaces inhabited by young children.  The 'ready-child' is constructed as a normative identity towards which the ‘unready’ child is expected to progress.  The confinement of children within such predetermined subject positions is considered problematic, as inevitably not all children will achieve these normative ideals, resulting in their exclusion from positions of 'success', as defined by dominant educational narratives.  In response to these concerns, this article seeks to disrupt dominant conceptualizations of 'readiness' in the context of early childhood education, attempting to produce a rupture in the educational landscape, expanding space for alternative ideas, theories and practices.  In a deliberate move away from concepts that relate 'readiness' to predefined goals, outcomes and identities, this article explores the possibility of thinking with a complex logic in order to generate new ideas, understandings and practices.  Approaching complexity from the ‘outside-in’, this paper draws in particular on the concept of 'becoming' (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987), exploring 'readiness' as a complex process of emergence, always open to the unpredictable and the new.  It is argued that ‘readiness’ is part of an open-ended ‘becoming’, rather than a pre-defined ‘state’.  Drawing on the work of Deleuze (1983), Deleuze and Guattari (1987) and Dewey (1899/2010; 1916), this reconceptualized idea of 'readiness' does not hark back to romantic notions that might consider all forms of development equally valid or desirable.  This paper argues, instead, that it matters greatly what and how children ‘become’ and as such, ‘readiness’ for these emergent ‘becomings’ must be considered an ethical and political endeavor.
重新定义幼儿教育中的主导话语:探索“准备”作为一种积极的伦理关系。
本文认为,英国早期儿童教育的景观是由“准备上学”和“准备学习”的话语主导的,这些话语对幼儿居住的教育空间起到了严重的分层作用。“准备好的孩子”被构建为一种规范性的身份,“没有准备好的”孩子被期望朝着这个身份前进。将儿童限制在这种预先确定的主体位置被认为是有问题的,因为不可避免地不是所有的孩子都能达到这些规范的理想,导致他们被排除在主流教育叙事所定义的“成功”位置之外。针对这些问题,本文试图颠覆幼儿教育背景下“准备就绪”的主流概念,试图在教育景观中产生断裂,为替代思想、理论和实践拓展空间。在刻意远离“准备就绪”与预定义目标、结果和身份相关的概念的过程中,本文探索了用复杂逻辑思考的可能性,以产生新的想法、理解和实践。从“由外而内”接近复杂性,本文特别借鉴了“成为”的概念(德勒兹和瓜塔里,1987),探索“准备”作为一个复杂的出现过程,总是对不可预测的和新的开放。有人认为,“准备就绪”是开放式“成为”的一部分,而不是预先定义的“状态”。借鉴德勒兹(1983)、德勒兹和瓜塔里(1987)和杜威(1899/2010;1916年),这种“准备就绪”的重新概念化的想法并没有回到浪漫主义的观念,这种观念可能认为所有形式的发展都同样有效或可取。相反,本文认为,儿童“成为”什么以及如何“成为”非常重要,因此,为这些新兴的“成为”“准备”必须被视为一种道德和政治努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信