Quantifying the relationship between mechanical loading and the skeletal response in pre- and early-pubertal girls

L. Saxon, S. Iuliano‐Burns, G. Naughton, R. Daly, S. Bass
{"title":"Quantifying the relationship between mechanical loading and the skeletal response in pre- and early-pubertal girls","authors":"L. Saxon, S. Iuliano‐Burns, G. Naughton, R. Daly, S. Bass","doi":"10.1097/00005768-200305001-00064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE Before exercise prescription for bone health can be recommended, the relationship between mechanical loading characteristics and the skeletal response need to be quantified. We asked i) does moderate impact exercise result in a greater gain in BMC than low impact exercise, ii) what are the loading characteristics associated with a moderate and low impact exercise program and does this differ from non-structured play?, and iii) does loading history affect the osteogenic response to a moderate or low impact program? METHODS Sixty-eight pre- and early-pubertal girls (aged 8.9 +/- 0.2 yrs) were randomized to take part in a moderate or low impact exercise program 3 times/wk for 8.5 mnths. The number and type of loads associated with the exercise classes and non-structured play (recess) were assessed from video footage. The magnitude of load was assessed using a pedar in-sole mobile system. Hours of moderate and high impact organized sport were assessed from a physical activity questionnaire. RESULTS The moderate and low impact exercise programs consisted of -400 impacts per class, but the jumping, hopping and dynamic activities performed during the moderate impact program produced forces ranging from 2 to 4 times body weight (BW) compared to -1 BW for the low impact program. Moderate impact exercise resulted in a 2.7% greater gain in BMC at the tibia compared to the low impact exercise. The moderate impact exercise program consisted of fewer low impacts (1-2 BW) and a higher number of moderate impacts (2-4BW) compared to those typically performed during non-structured play. There were greater gains in BMC in subjects participating in the moderate versus the low impact exercise programs who participated in 2 to 3 hours of moderate impact sports outside school (2.5% to 4.5%, p CONCLUSION Approximately 400 impacts ranging 2-4 BW, 3 times/wk was enough stimuli to result in an osteogenic response in normally active girls; even in those actively involved in moderate impact sports outside school.","PeriodicalId":18528,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and science in sports","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and science in sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200305001-00064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE Before exercise prescription for bone health can be recommended, the relationship between mechanical loading characteristics and the skeletal response need to be quantified. We asked i) does moderate impact exercise result in a greater gain in BMC than low impact exercise, ii) what are the loading characteristics associated with a moderate and low impact exercise program and does this differ from non-structured play?, and iii) does loading history affect the osteogenic response to a moderate or low impact program? METHODS Sixty-eight pre- and early-pubertal girls (aged 8.9 +/- 0.2 yrs) were randomized to take part in a moderate or low impact exercise program 3 times/wk for 8.5 mnths. The number and type of loads associated with the exercise classes and non-structured play (recess) were assessed from video footage. The magnitude of load was assessed using a pedar in-sole mobile system. Hours of moderate and high impact organized sport were assessed from a physical activity questionnaire. RESULTS The moderate and low impact exercise programs consisted of -400 impacts per class, but the jumping, hopping and dynamic activities performed during the moderate impact program produced forces ranging from 2 to 4 times body weight (BW) compared to -1 BW for the low impact program. Moderate impact exercise resulted in a 2.7% greater gain in BMC at the tibia compared to the low impact exercise. The moderate impact exercise program consisted of fewer low impacts (1-2 BW) and a higher number of moderate impacts (2-4BW) compared to those typically performed during non-structured play. There were greater gains in BMC in subjects participating in the moderate versus the low impact exercise programs who participated in 2 to 3 hours of moderate impact sports outside school (2.5% to 4.5%, p CONCLUSION Approximately 400 impacts ranging 2-4 BW, 3 times/wk was enough stimuli to result in an osteogenic response in normally active girls; even in those actively involved in moderate impact sports outside school.
量化青春期前和青春期早期女孩的机械负荷和骨骼反应之间的关系
在推荐骨骼健康的运动处方之前,需要量化机械负荷特性与骨骼反应之间的关系。我们的问题是:i)中等强度运动是否比低强度运动更能增加BMC ? ii)中等强度和低强度运动项目的负荷特征是什么?这与非结构化运动有什么不同?iii)负重史是否会影响中等或低冲击项目的成骨反应?方法68名青春期前和青春期早期女孩(年龄8.9 +/- 0.2岁)随机参加中等或低强度运动计划,每周3次,持续8.5个月。与锻炼课程和非结构化游戏(休息)相关的负荷的数量和类型通过视频片段进行评估。负荷的大小是评估使用脚蹬在鞋底移动系统。通过身体活动问卷评估中度和高强度有组织运动的时间。结果中、低冲击训练项目每班的冲击次数为-400次,而中冲击训练项目中进行的跳跃、跳跃和动态运动产生的力量为体重(BW)的2 ~ 4倍,而低冲击训练项目的力量为-1 BW。与低冲击运动相比,中度冲击运动导致胫骨BMC增加2.7%。与非结构化训练相比,中度冲击训练项目包括较少的低冲击(1-2磅重)和较多的中度冲击(2-4磅重)。与参加2- 3小时校外中等强度运动的低强度运动项目的受试者相比,参加中等强度运动项目的受试者BMC的收益更大(2.5% - 4.5%,p)结论:大约400次2-4 BW的冲击,3次/周足以刺激正常运动的女孩产生成骨反应;即使是那些积极参加校外中等强度运动的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信