Simulation of Pressure- and Temperature-Dependent Fracturing Fluid Loss in Multi-Porosity Multi-Permeability Formations

Chao Liu, Dung T. Phan, Y. Abousleiman
{"title":"Simulation of Pressure- and Temperature-Dependent Fracturing Fluid Loss in Multi-Porosity Multi-Permeability Formations","authors":"Chao Liu, Dung T. Phan, Y. Abousleiman","doi":"10.2118/204581-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper, the multi-porosity multi-permeability porothermoelastic theory is used to derive the analytical solution to calculate the pressure- and temperature-dependent fracturing fluid loss. A triple-porosity triple-permeability source rock formation is selected as an example to illustrate the model. The effects of fracturing fluid temperature and natural fractures on the fluid loss rate are systematically illustrated. The model successfully accounts for the varying leak-off rates in the multi-permeability channels through the hydraulic fracture faces. Furthermore, thermal diffusion near the hydraulic fracture faces contributes to a variation of pore pressure whose gradient at hydraulic fracture faces directly controls the fracturing fluid leak-off rate. The model shows that thermal effects bring almost 27% variation in the leak-off rate. Comparison study indicates that the single porosity model without considering multi-permeability systems or thermal effects significantly underestimates the rate of fracturing fluid loss and predicts nearly 84% and 87% lower leak-off rate, compared to the dual-porosity dual-permeability and triple-porosity triple-permeability models, respectively. Two case studies using published laboratory measurements on naturally fractured Blue Ohio sandstone samples are conducted to show the performances of the model. It is shown that the model presented in this paper well captures the total leak-off volume during the pressure-dependent fluid loss measured from laboratory tests. Matching the analytical solution to the laboratory data also allows rocks’ double permeabilities to be estimated.","PeriodicalId":11320,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Tue, November 30, 2021","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Tue, November 30, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/204581-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the multi-porosity multi-permeability porothermoelastic theory is used to derive the analytical solution to calculate the pressure- and temperature-dependent fracturing fluid loss. A triple-porosity triple-permeability source rock formation is selected as an example to illustrate the model. The effects of fracturing fluid temperature and natural fractures on the fluid loss rate are systematically illustrated. The model successfully accounts for the varying leak-off rates in the multi-permeability channels through the hydraulic fracture faces. Furthermore, thermal diffusion near the hydraulic fracture faces contributes to a variation of pore pressure whose gradient at hydraulic fracture faces directly controls the fracturing fluid leak-off rate. The model shows that thermal effects bring almost 27% variation in the leak-off rate. Comparison study indicates that the single porosity model without considering multi-permeability systems or thermal effects significantly underestimates the rate of fracturing fluid loss and predicts nearly 84% and 87% lower leak-off rate, compared to the dual-porosity dual-permeability and triple-porosity triple-permeability models, respectively. Two case studies using published laboratory measurements on naturally fractured Blue Ohio sandstone samples are conducted to show the performances of the model. It is shown that the model presented in this paper well captures the total leak-off volume during the pressure-dependent fluid loss measured from laboratory tests. Matching the analytical solution to the laboratory data also allows rocks’ double permeabilities to be estimated.
多孔隙度、多渗透性地层中压力和温度相关压裂液损失模拟
本文采用多孔隙度、多渗透性的孔隙热弹性理论,推导出了随压力和温度变化的压裂液漏失的解析解。以某三孔三渗烃源岩为例,对该模型进行了说明。系统阐述了压裂液温度和天然裂缝对漏液速率的影响。该模型成功地解释了通过水力裂缝面的多渗透通道中不同的泄漏率。此外,水力裂缝附近的热扩散会导致孔隙压力的变化,而孔隙压力在水力裂缝处的梯度直接控制着压裂液的漏出率。该模型表明,热效应导致泄漏率变化近27%。对比研究表明,不考虑多渗透系统或热效应的单一孔隙度模型明显低估了压裂液的损失率,与双孔双渗和三孔三渗模型相比,其漏失率分别降低了近84%和87%。使用已发表的实验室测量结果对天然裂缝的Blue Ohio砂岩样品进行了两个案例研究,以展示该模型的性能。结果表明,本文提出的模型能很好地反映实验室测试中测得的压力相关失液过程中的总泄漏体积。将分析解与实验室数据相匹配,还可以估计岩石的双渗透率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信