Illness perception and perceived benefits of illness among persons with type 1 diabetes.

PsycCritiques Pub Date : 2022-11-14 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5114/hpr/153999
Wiktoria Rymon Lipińska, Katarzyna Nowicka-Sauer
{"title":"Illness perception and perceived benefits of illness among persons with type 1 diabetes.","authors":"Wiktoria Rymon Lipińska, Katarzyna Nowicka-Sauer","doi":"10.5114/hpr/153999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Illness perception is assigned an increasing role in the control of chronic disease. This study examines illness perception and perceived benefits related to illness in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus. We used quantitative and qualitative methods for a more in-depth analysis.</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>The participants (<i>N</i> = 110; mean age: 31.52 years; 80.9% women) completed online questionnaires: the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ), the perceived benefits subscale of the Illness Cognition Questionnaire (ICQ) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was used to analyze patients' responses to an open-ended question regarding perceived benefits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perceived benefits score was positively correlated with personal (ρ = .20) and treatment control: life-style (ρ = .25) and coherence (ρ = .22). Negative correlations were noted between B-IPQ total score (ρ = -.30), concern (ρ = -.30), depression (ρ = -.35), anxiety (ρ = -.32) and irritability (ρ = -.19). 52.7% of participants reported at least one benefit of having type 1 diabetes. Patients who reported at least one benefit had statistically significantly higher scores in the perceived benefits subscale (<i>p</i> < .001), personal control (<i>p</i> = .005) and treatment control (<i>p</i> = .030) and lower scores in consequences (<i>p</i> = .023), identity (<i>p</i> = .045), concern (<i>p</i> < .001), emotional response (<i>p</i> < .001), and illness perception total score (<i>p</i> < .001) than those who did not report any benefit. IPA revealed four main themes: personal benefits, health-related benefits, social contacts and economic benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study revealed that in patients with type 1 diabetes perceived disease benefits are closely related to more positive illness perception and lower levels of depression, anxiety and irritability. The findings suggest that addressing potential benefits related to illness may influence the emotional state.</p>","PeriodicalId":90306,"journal":{"name":"PsycCritiques","volume":"45 1","pages":"200-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10670789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PsycCritiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr/153999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Illness perception is assigned an increasing role in the control of chronic disease. This study examines illness perception and perceived benefits related to illness in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus. We used quantitative and qualitative methods for a more in-depth analysis.

Participants and procedure: The participants (N = 110; mean age: 31.52 years; 80.9% women) completed online questionnaires: the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ), the perceived benefits subscale of the Illness Cognition Questionnaire (ICQ) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was used to analyze patients' responses to an open-ended question regarding perceived benefits.

Results: Perceived benefits score was positively correlated with personal (ρ = .20) and treatment control: life-style (ρ = .25) and coherence (ρ = .22). Negative correlations were noted between B-IPQ total score (ρ = -.30), concern (ρ = -.30), depression (ρ = -.35), anxiety (ρ = -.32) and irritability (ρ = -.19). 52.7% of participants reported at least one benefit of having type 1 diabetes. Patients who reported at least one benefit had statistically significantly higher scores in the perceived benefits subscale (p < .001), personal control (p = .005) and treatment control (p = .030) and lower scores in consequences (p = .023), identity (p = .045), concern (p < .001), emotional response (p < .001), and illness perception total score (p < .001) than those who did not report any benefit. IPA revealed four main themes: personal benefits, health-related benefits, social contacts and economic benefits.

Conclusions: The study revealed that in patients with type 1 diabetes perceived disease benefits are closely related to more positive illness perception and lower levels of depression, anxiety and irritability. The findings suggest that addressing potential benefits related to illness may influence the emotional state.

1 型糖尿病患者的疾病感知和对疾病好处的认知。
背景:疾病感知在慢性疾病的控制中发挥着越来越重要的作用。本研究探讨了 1 型糖尿病患者的疾病感知和与疾病相关的感知益处。我们采用定量和定性方法进行了更深入的分析:参与者(N = 110;平均年龄:31.52 岁;80.9% 为女性)填写了在线问卷:简明疾病感知问卷(B-IPQ)、疾病认知问卷(ICQ)的获益感知分量表以及医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)。解释性现象学分析法(IPA)用于分析患者对有关获益感知的开放式问题的回答:感知益处得分与个人(ρ = .20)和治疗控制呈正相关:生活方式(ρ = .25)和连贯性(ρ = .22)。B-IPQ 总分(ρ = -.30)、担忧(ρ = -.30)、抑郁(ρ = -.35)、焦虑(ρ = -.32)和易怒(ρ = -.19)之间呈负相关。52.7% 的参与者表示,患 1 型糖尿病至少有一个好处。与未报告任何益处的患者相比,报告了至少一项益处的患者在益处感知子量表(p < .001)、个人控制(p = .005)和治疗控制(p = .030)方面的得分明显较高,而在后果(p = .023)、身份认同(p = .045)、担忧(p < .001)、情绪反应(p < .001)和疾病感知总分(p < .001)方面的得分较低。IPA 揭示了四大主题:个人利益、健康相关利益、社会交往和经济利益:研究表明,1 型糖尿病患者感知到的疾病益处与更积极的疾病认知以及更低的抑郁、焦虑和烦躁水平密切相关。研究结果表明,处理与疾病相关的潜在益处可能会影响患者的情绪状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信