Change readiness in individuals experiencing homelessness and multiple complex needs

IF 0.6 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
A. Lord, Anna Tickle, Anna Buckell
{"title":"Change readiness in individuals experiencing homelessness and multiple complex needs","authors":"A. Lord, Anna Tickle, Anna Buckell","doi":"10.1108/HCS-11-2020-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to understand how staff in homelessness services conceptualise readiness for change in the individuals they support and how this informs their decision-making in practice. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative design was used. Ten staff members participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were examined through inductive–deductive thematic analysis, using a social constructivist epistemological lens. Findings Five main themes were constructed: “multiple complex needs mean multiple complex changes”, “talk versus behaviour”, “change is not a linear trajectory”, “the role of consistent boundaried relationships” and “change is not solely within the individual’s control”. Practical implications This research challenges existing notions of “readiness for change” as located within individuals and a prerequisite for using support from services. It has implications for staff and services, particularly those which are time-limited and address only single problems; service users may not be ready for some changes, but it should not be assumed they are not ready for change in other areas of their life. The offer of supportive relationships may precede and contribute to readiness for positive changes. Support should be offered based not only an individual’s intra-psychic readiness for change but also how the system might actively work to promote hope that change can be achieved and maintained. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to explore staff members’ conceptualisations of readiness to change in relation to individuals with multiple complex needs and how this might influence practice.","PeriodicalId":43302,"journal":{"name":"Housing Care and Support","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Care and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HCS-11-2020-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to understand how staff in homelessness services conceptualise readiness for change in the individuals they support and how this informs their decision-making in practice. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative design was used. Ten staff members participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were examined through inductive–deductive thematic analysis, using a social constructivist epistemological lens. Findings Five main themes were constructed: “multiple complex needs mean multiple complex changes”, “talk versus behaviour”, “change is not a linear trajectory”, “the role of consistent boundaried relationships” and “change is not solely within the individual’s control”. Practical implications This research challenges existing notions of “readiness for change” as located within individuals and a prerequisite for using support from services. It has implications for staff and services, particularly those which are time-limited and address only single problems; service users may not be ready for some changes, but it should not be assumed they are not ready for change in other areas of their life. The offer of supportive relationships may precede and contribute to readiness for positive changes. Support should be offered based not only an individual’s intra-psychic readiness for change but also how the system might actively work to promote hope that change can be achieved and maintained. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to explore staff members’ conceptualisations of readiness to change in relation to individuals with multiple complex needs and how this might influence practice.
改变无家可归者和有多种复杂需求的个人的准备情况
目的本研究旨在了解无家可归者服务机构的工作人员如何将他们所支持的个人对变化的准备程度概念化,以及这如何影响他们在实践中的决策。设计/方法/方法采用定性设计。10名工作人员参加了半结构化访谈。数据是通过归纳演绎专题分析,使用社会建构主义认识论的镜头检查。研究结果构建了五个主题:“多重复杂的需求意味着多重复杂的变化”、“谈话与行为”、“变化不是线性轨迹”、“一致边界关系的作用”和“变化不仅仅在个人的控制范围内”。实际意义本研究挑战了现有的“变革准备”概念,该概念位于个人内部,是使用服务支持的先决条件。它对工作人员和服务有影响,特别是那些有时间限制和只处理单一问题的工作人员和服务;服务用户可能还没有准备好接受某些变化,但不应该认为他们还没有准备好接受生活中其他领域的变化。提供支持性关系可能先于并有助于为积极的变化做好准备。所提供的支持不仅应基于个人对变革的内心准备,而且应基于制度如何积极地促进实现和维持变革的希望。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一个探讨员工对具有多种复杂需求的个人的变化准备程度的概念,以及这可能如何影响实践的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Housing Care and Support
Housing Care and Support URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信